 | Drucilla Cornell, Michel Rosenfeld, David Gray Carlson - 1992 - 428 páginas
...regarded by the judges, as a fundamental law. It therefore belongs to them to ascertain its meaning, as well as the meaning of any particular act proceeding from the legislative body." In normal circumstances the presumption was in favor of the congruence or concordance between foundation... | |
 | United States. Congress. Senate. Committee on the Judiciary - 1992 - 1148 páginas
...by the judges, as a fundamental law. It therefore belongs to them to ascertain its meaning, as veil as the meaning of any particular act proceeding from the legislative body. The legislative branch remains the principle source of lav and regulation outside the Constitution... | |
 | Christopher L. Tomlins - 1993 - 432 páginas
...regarded by the Judges as a fundamental law. It therefore belongs to them to ascertain its meaning, as well as the meaning of any particular Act proceeding from the Legislative body. If there should happen to be an irreconcilable variance between the two, that which has the superior obligation... | |
 | United States. Congress. Senate. Committee on the Judiciary - 1994 - 800 páginas
...regarded by the judges as, a fundamental law. It therefore belongs to them to ascertain its meaning as well as the meaning of any particular act proceeding from the legislative body * * *. It can be of no weight to say that the courts, on the pretense of a repugnancy [between a legislative... | |
 | Elvind Smith - 1995 - 424 páginas
...regarded by the judges as a fundamental law. It therefore belongs to them to ascertain its meaning as well as the meaning of any particular act proceeding from the legislative body. If there should happen to be an irreconcilable variance between the two, that which has the superior obligation... | |
 | Bernard Schwartz - 1993 - 480 páginas
...regarded by the judges as a fundamental law. It must therefore belong to them to ascertain its meaning, as well as the meaning of any particular act proceeding from the legislative body. If there should happen to be an irreconcilable variance between the two, that which has the superior obligation... | |
 | George Wescott Carey - 1994 - 220 páginas
..."is, in fact, and must be regarded by the judges as, a fundamental law," ascertaining its meaning, "as well as the meaning of any particular act proceeding from the legislative body," falls within the province of the judiciary. Consequently, if there is an "irreconcilable variance between... | |
 | Dennis C. Mueller - 1996 - 395 páginas
...regarded by the judges, as a fundamental law. It therefore belongs to them to ascertain its meaning, as well as the meaning of any particular act proceeding from the legislative body. If there should happen to be an irreconcilable variance between the two, that which has the superior obligation... | |
 | Tim Hames, Nicol C. Rae - 1996 - 354 páginas
...regarded by the judges as, a fundamental law. It therefore belongs to them to ascertain its meaning as well as the meaning of any particular act proceeding from the legislative body. If there should happen to be an irreconcilable variance between the two, that which has the superior obligation... | |
 | St. George Tucker, William Blackstone - 2000 - 3301 páginas
...regarded by the judges as a fundamental law. It therefore belongs to them, to ascertain its meaning as well as the meaning of any particular act proceeding from the legislative body. If there should hap-- pen to be an irreconcilcable variance between the two, -that which has the superior obligation... | |
| |
The interpretation of the laws is the proper and peculiar province of the Courts. A Constitution is, in fact, and must be regarded by the Judges, as a fundamental law. It therefore belongs to them to ascertain its meaning, as well as the meaning of any... 
