 | John P. Kaminski, Richard Leffler - 1998 - 244 páginas
...regarded by the judges as a fundamental law. It therefore belongs to them to ascertain its meaning as well as the meaning of any particular act proceeding from the legislative body. If there should happen to be an irreconcileable variance between the two, that which has the superior obligation... | |
 | Alexander Hamilton, James Madison, John Jay - 1998 - 220 páginas
...regarded by the judges as a fundamental law. It therefore belongs to them to ascertain its meaning, as well as the meaning of any particular act proceeding from the legislative body. If there should happen to be an irreconcilable variance between the two, that which has the superior obligation... | |
 | Andy Williams - 1998 - 230 páginas
...regarded by the judges as a fundamental law. It must therefore belong to them to ascertain its meaning, as well as the meaning of any particular act proceeding from the legislative body.' Neither the power to interpret the Constitution nor judicial review were made explicit in the Constitution... | |
 | Antonio Negri - 1999 - 504 páginas
...regarded by the judges as, a fundamental law. It therefore belongs to them to ascertain its meaning as well as the meaning of any particular act proceeding from the legislative body. If there should have to be an irreconcilable variance between the two, that which has the superior obligation... | |
 | Andr s Saj¢ - 1999 - 312 páginas
...regarded by the judges as, a fundamental law. It therefore belongs to them to ascertain its meaning as well as the meaning of any particular act proceeding from the legislative body. If there should happen to be an irreconcilable variance between the two. ..the Constitution ought to be preferred... | |
 | Kermit L. Hall - 2000 - 506 páginas
...regarded by the judges as a fundamental law. It therefore belongs to them to ascertain its meaning as well as the meaning of any particular act proceeding from the legislative body .... [Therefore, i]t can be of no weight to say, that the courts on the pretence of a repugnancy, may... | |
 | Alexander Hamilton, James Madison, John Jay - 2001 - 70 páginas
...HAMILTON, On the Judiciary Department: "It Belongs to the judges to Ascertain the Constitution's Meaning As Well As the Meaning of Any Particular Act Proceeding from the Legislative Body" (May 28, 1788) 172 80 HAMILTON, On the Powers of the Judiciary: "It Will Be Necessary to Consider What... | |
 | Mark Robert Killenbeck - 2002 - 214 páginas
...regarded by the judges as a fundamental law. It therefore belongs to them to ascertain its meaning as well as the meaning of any particular act proceeding from the legislative body.""0 Further, to allow Congress to be the final judge of the constitutionality of its enactments... | |
 | Sotirios A. Barber, Robert P. George - 2001 - 354 páginas
...by the judges as, a fundamental law. It therefore belongs to them [judges] to ascertain its meaning as well as the meaning of any particular act proceeding from the legislative body."21 And again in No. 78, "The interpretation of the laws is the proper and peculiar province of... | |
 | Alexander Hamilton, James Madison, John Jay - 2003 - 692 páginas
...regarded by the judges as. a fundamental law. It therefore belongs to them to ascertain its meaning as well as the meaning of any particular act proceeding from the legislative body. If there should happen to be an irreconcilable variance between the two, that which has the superior obligation... | |
| |
The interpretation of the laws is the proper and peculiar province of the Courts. A Constitution is, in fact, and must be regarded by the Judges, as a fundamental law. It therefore belongs to them to ascertain its meaning, as well as the meaning of any... 
