...of mere courtesy and good will on the other . . . comity is the recognition which one nation allows within its territory to the legislative, executive, or judicial acts of another nation."" "Recognition" is essentially a passive affair, signaling deference to another nation's action. Positive...

...coequal sovereign nations and plays a role in determining "the recognition which one nation allows within its territory to the legislative, executive or judicial acts of another nation."7 Thus, in determining whether to assert jurisdiction to investigate or bring an action, or...

...nor of mere courtesy and good will, upon the other. But it is the recognition which one nation allows within its territory to the legislative, executive,...other persons who are under the protection of its laws."*42- 34: Gestützt auf dieses Prinzip der comity formulierte der Supreme Court im Fall HILTON...

...different result.69 The US Supreme Court has defined comity as "the recognition which one nation allows within its territory to the legislative, executive,...convenience, and to the rights of its own citizens, or other persons who are under the protection of its laws."70 "[T]he concept of international comity requires...

...which one nation allows within its territory to the legislative, executive or judicial acts ofanother nation, having due regard both to international duty and convenience, and to the rights ofits own citizens or of other persons who are under the protection ofits laws. "555 Inzwischen hat...

...obligation . . . nor of mere courtesy and good will — But it is the recognition which one nation allows within its territory to the legislative, executive...persons who are under the protection of its laws. 0'" See Colorado River Water Conservation Dist. v. United States, 424 US 800 (1976). This argument...

...nor of mere courtesy and good will, upon the other. But it is the recognition which one nation allows within its territory to the legislative, executive...other persons who are under the protection of its laws.6 In the seminal US Supreme Court case of Hilton v. Guyot, the Court held that a US court should...

...nor of mere courtesy and good will upon the other. But it is the recognition which one nation allows within its territory to the legislative, executive...citizens or of other persons who are under the protection ofthe laws. ". Comity als Grundlage des Kollisionsrechts8 wird sie ferner etwa als Grenze der internationalen...

...agreements.41 Comity was defined as early as 1895 as being the principle under which a state has regard 'within its territory to the legislative, executive,...another nation, having due regard both to international law and convenience, and to the rights of its own 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003...

...obligation . . . nor of mere courtesy and good will. . . . But it is the recognition which one nation allows within its territory to the legislative, executive...judicial acts of another nation, having due regard hoth to international duty and convenience, and to the rights of its own citizens or of other persons...