...principle of "judicial review," which was to become a mainstay of the rule of law in America. He continued: "A constitution is, in fact, and must be regarded...particular act proceeding from the legislative body." In normal circumstances the presumption was in favor of the congruence or concordance between foundation...

...Constitution. In The Federalist, Ho. LXXVIII, Alexander Hamilton observed that: The interpretation of the lavs is the proper and peculiar province of the courts....therefore belongs to them to ascertain its meaning, as veil as the meaning of any particular act proceeding from the legislative body. The legislative branch...

...they both apply. 5 US (1 Cranch) at 177-78. Hamilton had said this too: The interpretation of the laws is the proper and peculiar province of the courts....must be regarded by the Judges as a fundamental law .... If there should happen to be an irreconcilable variance between [it and a legislative act,] that...

...regarded by the judges. To them, therefore, it belongs to ascertain the meaning of the constitution as well as the meaning of any particular act proceeding from the legislative body. The fundamental law is the highest law. The obligation and validity of the constitution is, of course,...

...orthodox jews. ALEXANDER HAMILTON, ONE OF OUR FOUNDING FATHERS, IN THE • FEDERALIST PAPERS SAID, " A CONSTITUTION IS, IN FACT, AND MUST BE REGARDED BY THE JUDGES, A FUNDAMENTAL LAW.' PARENTAL ALIENATION Ohel, the agency to whom the boys were given with two new social...

...predilection. He rejected the concern that such judicial review made the judiciary superior to the legislature: "A constitution, is, in fact, and must be regarded...particular act proceeding from the legislative body * * *. It can be of no weight to say that the courts, on the pretense of a repugnancy [between a legislative...

...things, to keep the latter within the limits assigned to their authority. The interpretation of the laws is the proper and peculiar province of the courts....therefore belongs to them to ascertain its meaning . . . ."); Marburv v. Madison. 5 US (1 Cranch) 137, 177 (1803) . 21 ££. United States v. Verduao-Urouidez...

...things, to keep the latter within the limits assigned to their authority. The interpretation of the laws is the proper and peculiar province of the courts....by the judges as, a fundamental law. It therefore belong* to them to ascertain its meaning ....*); Marbury v. Madison. 5 US (1 Cranch) 137, 177 (1803)....

...things, to keep the latter within the limits assigned to their authority. The interpretation of the laws is the proper and peculiar province of the courts....and must be regarded by the judges as, a fundamental lav. It therefore belongs to them to ascertain its meaning ...."); Marburv v. Madison. 5 US (1 Cranch)...

...authority of the judicial pronouncement in the particular case only: "The interpretation of the laws is the proper and peculiar province of the courts....is, in fact, and must be regarded by the judges, as 77 a fundamental law" (Federalist No. 78). Conclusion: it is the proper and peculiar province of the...