 The interpretation of the laws is the proper and peculiar province of the courts. A constitution is, in fact, and must be regarded by the judges, as a fundamental law.  The Life of John Marshall - Página 120por Albert Jeremiah Beveridge - 2005 - 700 páginasVista previa limitada - Acerca de este libro
 | United States. Supreme Court - 1909
...within the limits assigned to their authority. The interpretation of the laws is the proper and the peculiar province of the courts. A constitution is, in fact, and must be regarded by judges, as a fundamental law. It must, therefore, belong to them to ascertain its meaning, as well... | |
 | Andrew Johnson - 1868
...things, to keep the latter within the limits assigned to their authority. The interpretation of the laws is the proper and peculiar province of the courts....Constitution is in fact, and must be regarded by the jndges as a fundamental law. It therefore belongs to them to ascertain its meaning, as well as the... | |
 | 1920
...In an early Virginia case it was said : "The interpretation of the law is the proper and particular province of the Courts. A constitution is in fact,...any particular act proceeding from the legislative body."4 Speaking of the power of the legislature, Gibson, CJ, of the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania,... | |
 | James Breckinridge Waller - 1880 - 83 páginas
...expounded in the following extract from No. 78 of that great work: " The interpretation of the laws is the proper and peculiar province of the courts....and must be regarded by the judges as a fundamental lawIt must, therefore, belong to them to ascertain its meaning, as well as the meaning of any particular... | |
 | Sir Fortunatus Dwarris - 1885 - 693 páginas
...peculiar province of the courts. The constitution is, in fact, and must be, regarded by judges, as fundamental law. It therefore belongs to them, to ascertain its meaning, as well as of any particular act proceeding from a legislative body. If there should happen to be an irreconcilable... | |
 | 1912
...legislative act, therefore, contrary to the constitution can be valid. . . . The interpretation of the laws is the proper and peculiar province of the courts....particular act proceeding from the legislative body." It has been insisted by some that the court has no power to declare laws unconstitutional and that... | |
 | 1886
...v. Van Kleeck, 5 Am. Dec. 291]; 3 Cook, 7; 6 Bac. Stat. 11. The constitution is one of them, and " is, in fact, and must be regarded by the judges as a fundamental law :" Federalist No. 78. It was created by the people who, in our republics, are "the supreme power:"... | |
 | Simon Sterne - 1888 - 361 páginas
...to keep the latter within the limits assigned to their authority. « The interpretation of the laws is the proper and peculiar province of the courts....be regarded by the judges as a fundamental law. It must, therefore, belong to them to ascertain its meaning as well as the meaning of any particular act... | |
 | Frederick Pollock - 1888
...recollected from any particular provisions in the Constitution. . . . The interpretation of the laws is the proper and peculiar province of the courts....be regarded by the judges, as a fundamental law. It must therefore belong to them to ascertain its meaning, as well as the meaning of any particular act... | |
 | Judson Stuart Landon - 1889 - 389 páginas
...only what their powers do not authorize, but what they forbid. . . . The interpretation of the laws is the proper and peculiar province of the courts....be regarded by the judges as, a fundamental law. It must, therefore, belong to them to ascertain its meaning, as well as the meauiug of any particular... | |
| |
