 | Eri Baker Hulbert - 1907 - 516 páginas
...mind and the mind of his successors when he said : As for the absolute prerogative of the crown, that is no subject for the tongue of a lawyer, nor is it lawful to be disputed. It is atheism and blasphemy to dispute what God can do; good Christians content themselves with his... | |
 | Samuel Rawson Gardiner - 1910 - 1208 páginas
...was the language which followed. "As for the absolute prerogative of the Crown," he declared, " that is no subject for the tongue of a lawyer, nor is it lawful to be disputed. It is atheism and blasphemy to dispute what God can do : good Christians content themselves with His... | |
 | James Phinney Baxter - 1915 - 790 páginas
...renunciation of one of his deepest rooted religious tenets. Said James I, "The absolute prerogative of the Crown is no subject for the tongue of a lawyer. It is presumption and high contempt in a subject to dispute what a King can do, or say that a King... | |
 | Richard Helgerson - 1992 - 390 páginas
...See, for example, James's 1616 speech in Star Chamber where he insisted that "the absolute prerogative of the crown ... is no subject for the tongue of a lawyer." Elsewhere in the same speech, James denied the countervailing secrecy of the law. "Though the laws... | |
 | T. Hochstrasser, Peter Schro der, P. Schröder - 2003 - 364 páginas
...James VI and I had been able to assert confidently that "the absolute Prerogative of the Crowne, that is no subject for the Tongue of a Lawyer, nor is it lawfull to be disputed", (James VI and I, "A Speach in the Starre-Chamber, the XX of June, Anno 1619",... | |
 | Clare Jackson - 2003 - 284 páginas
...James VI & I had been confidently able to enjoin that 'the absolute Prerogatiue of the Crowne, that is no subject for the Tongue of a Lawyer, nor is it lawfull to be disputed'.41 By contrast, it was one Restoration Lord Advocate, Mackenzie, who produced... | |
 | James Harvey Robinson - 1925 - 986 páginas
...As for the absolute prerogative of the crown," he declares, expression of . . . . his claims. " that is no subject for the tongue of a lawyer, nor is it lawful to be disputed. It is atheism and blasphemy to dispute what God can do : ... so it is presumption and high contempt... | |
 | Clarence Perkins - 1927 - 528 páginas
...lecturing Parliament on that subject.1 Once he said, "As for the absolute prerogative of the crown that is no subject for the tongue of a lawyer, nor is it lawful to be disputed. It is atheism and blasphemy to dispute what God can do. So it is presumption and high contempt in a... | |
| |
His word ; so it is presumption and high contempt in a subject to dispute what a king can do, or say that a king cannot do this or that... 
