 | United States. Congress. Senate. Committee on the Judiciary - 1993 - 636 páginas
...broader principle beyond equal protection. Let me read to you from Eisenstadt the majority opinion. "The marital couple is not an independent entity with a mind and a heart of its own, but an association of two individuals, each with a separate intellectual and emotional... | |
 | Neal Devins, Wendy L. Watson - 1995 - 474 páginas
...ignored the Court's oft-repeated statement regarding the privacy rights of individuals: It is true that in Griswold the right of privacy in question inhered in the marital relationship. Yet the married couple is not an independent entity with a mind and heart of its own, but an association of... | |
 | Michael J. Sandel - 1998 - 436 páginas
...institution of marriage to persons qua individuals, independent of their roles or attachments. "It is true that in Griswold the right of privacy in question...individuals each with a separate intellectual and emotional makeup."29 The subtler though no less fateful change was in the shift from the old privacy to the new.... | |
 | Marshall L. DeRosa - 226 páginas
...married to unmarried persons. He does so by atomizing the marital relationship. He wrote that "it is true that in Griswold the right of privacy in question...individuals each with a separate intellectual and emotional makeup."18 This view of the marital relationship is indistinguishable from that of unmarried persons.... | |
 | Sue Heinemann - 1996 - 404 páginas
...states cannot restrict an unmarried person's access to contraceptives. The majority opinion states: "If the right of privacy means anything, it is the right of the individual ... to be free from unwarranted government intrusion into matters so fundamentally affecting a person... | |
 | Edward Tivnan - 1996 - 344 páginas
...that made it more difficult for unmarried people to get contraceptives. According to Justice Brennan, if "the right of privacy means anything, it is the right of an individual, married or single, to be free from unwarranted governmental intrusion into matters so... | |
 | Mary Ann Glendon - 1989 - 336 páginas
...theme in recent decisions of the United States Supreme Court. In Eisenstadt v. Baird, the Court said: "[T]he marital couple is not an independent entity...individuals each with a separate intellectual and emotional makeup."62 A few decisions still employ the rhetoric of family solidarity.63 But if one attends to... | |
 | Andrea Tone - 1997 - 278 páginas
...be prohibited, a ban on distribution to unmarried persons would be equally impermissible. It is true that in Griswold the right of privacy in question...couple is not an independent entity with a mind and From Eisenstadt v. Baird 405 US 438 (1972). heart of its own, but an association of two individuals... | |
 | Frank Hearn - 224 páginas
...separated from and, perhaps, in need of protection against, associational and institutional attachments. The marital couple is not an independent entity with...two individuals each with a separate intellectual 134 Social Capital and emotional make-up. If the right of privacy means anything, it is the right of... | |
 | John Witte - 1997 - 332 páginas
...choose whether to have or to forgo children. n In a 1972 case, the Court stated its rationale clearly: "The marital couple is not an independent entity with...association of two individuals, each with a separate emotional and intellectual makeup. If the right of privacy means anything, it is the right of the indivkfuoi,... | |
| |
Yet the marital couple is not an independent entity with a mind and heart of its own, but an association of two individuals each with a separate intellectual and emotional makeup. // the right of privacy means anything, it is the right of the individual,... 
