| 2001 - 1104 páginas
..."Representations to Court", every pleading, written motion or other paper "(1) is not being presented for any improper purpose such as to harass or to cause...or needless increase in the cost of litigation: (2) the claims and defenses and other legal contentions therein are warranted by existing law or by a nonfrivolous... | |
| Sebastian Neufang - 2002 - 276 páginas
...that to the best of the signer's knowledge, information, and belief formed after reasonable inquiry it is well grounded in fact and is warranted by existing...delay or needless increase in the cost of litigation. If a pleading, motion, or other paper is signed, it shall be stricken unless it is signed promtly after... | |
| 2003 - 312 páginas
...existing law or a good faith argument for the extension, modification, or reversal of existing law; (B) not interposed for any improper purpose, such as to...delay or needless increase in the cost of litigation; and (C) not unreasonable or unduly burdensome or expensive, given the needs of the case, the discovery... | |
| United States. Trademark Trial and Appeal Board - 2003 - 718 páginas
...existing law or a good faith argument for the extension, modification, or reversal of existing Iaw: (B) not interposed for any improper purpose, such as to...delay or needless increase in the cost of litigation: and (C) not unreasonable or unduly burdensome or expensive, given the needs of the case, the discovery... | |
| Jacob Ziegel - 2003 - 213 páginas
...and determined that the petition, pleading, or written motion: (I) is well grounded in fact; and (II) is warranted by existing law or a good faith argument...extension, modification, or reversal of existing law and does not constitute an abuse under paragraph (1). elects to convert to chapter 13 or if he by-passes... | |
| David F. Herr, Roger S. Haydock, Jeffrey W. Stempel - 2004 - 1270 páginas
...Stephen A. Melcher, Rule 11: Scalpel or Cudgel?, Bench & Bar of Minn., Oct. 1988, at 19. also certified that "it is not interposed for any improper purpose,...delay or needless increase in the cost of litigation." If a violation of the 1983 version occurred, Rule 11 provided that the court "shall impose . . . an... | |
| Sven Timmerbeil - 2004 - 256 páginas
...existing law or a good faith argument for the extension, modification, or reversal of existing law; (B) not interposed for any improper purpose, such as to...delay or needless increase in the cost of litigation; and (C) not unreasonable or unduly burdensome or expensive, given the needs of the case, the discovery... | |
| Stuart M. Israel - 2004 - 364 páginas
...existing law or a good faith argument for the extension, modification, or reversal of existing law; (B) not interposed for any improper purpose, such as to...delay or needless increase in the cost of litigation; and (C) not unreasonable or unduly burdensome or expensive, given the needs of the case, the discovery... | |
| Shannon P. Pratt - 2004 - 387 páginas
...existing law or a good faith argument for the extension, modification, or reversal of existing law; (B) not interposed for any improper purpose, such as to...delay or needless increase in the cost of litigation; and (C) not unreasonable or unduly burdensome or expensive, given the needs of the case, the discovery... | |
| Karen Ann Rolcik, Mark Warda - 2004 - 330 páginas
...argument for the extension, modification, or reversal of existing law, or (iii) was interposed for an improper purpose, such as to harass or to cause unnecessary...or needless increase in the cost of litigation. (2) For purposes of this section, "expenses" mean reasonable expenses incurred in the defense of a derivative... | |
| |