...past, and it is likely to be so in the future. COMPULSORY PHYSICAL EXAMINATION AND MEDICAL TREATMENT individual to the possession and control of his own person, free from all restramt or interference of others, unless by clear and unquestionable authority of law. Horace Gray...

..."[n]o right is held more sacred . . . than the right of every individual to [be] . . . free from [the] restraint or interference of others, unless by clear and unquestionable authority of law."4 The framers of the United States Constitution specifically drafted the Fourth Amendment "to...

...without legal justification was a battery. Before the turn of the century, this Court observed that "[n]o right is held more sacred, or is more carefully...unless by clear and unquestionable authority of law." [Citation omitted.] This notion of bodily integrity has been embodied in the requirement that informed...

...personal liberty, and private property.48 In an oft-quoted statement, the US Supreme Court said that: [n]o right is held more sacred, or is more carefully...unless by clear and unquestionable authority of law. As well said by Judge Cooley, "The right to one's person may be said to be a right of complete immunity:...

...without legal justification was a batten,'. Before the turn of the century, this Court observed that "no right is held more sacred, or is more carefully...unless by clear and unquestionable authority of law." This notion of bodily integrity has been embodied in the requirement that informed consent is generally...

...reaffirms the long recognized rights of privacy and bodily integrity. As early as 1891, the Court held, "[n]o right is held more sacred, or is more carefully guarded by the commonlaw, than the right of every individual to the possession and control of his own person, free...

...law readily withstand repetition. The first is from Union Pacific Railway Co. v. Botsford (1891):71 "No right is held more sacred, or is more carefully...unless by clear and unquestionable authority of law . . ." The second is from Justice Cardozo in Schloendorff v. Society of New York Hospital Schloendorff,...

...century. A synopsis of case law begins with Union Pacific Railway Co. v. Botsford, 141 US 250(1891): No right is held more sacred, or is more carefully...unless by clear and unquestionable authority of law. In Schloendorff v. Society of New York Hospitals, 102 NE 92 (NY, 1914), Justice Benjamin Cardozo wrote:...

...the issues discussed below involve challenges to the legal principle of individual bodily integrity: No right is held more sacred, or is more carefully...others, unless by clear and unquestionable authority of the law (Cruzan v. Director, Missouri Department of Health, 1990). 440 LEGAL AND ETHICAL ISSUES Concomitantly,...

...issues in the case. Justice Gray's opinion expressed this judgement as follows (Botsford, p.251): (25) No right is held more sacred, or is more carefully...every individual to the possession and control of his [or her] own person, free from all restraint or interference of others, unless by clear and unquestionable...