 | United States. Congress. Senate. Committee on the Judiciary - 1989 - 1414 páginas
...MUST BE REGARDED BY THE JUDGES AS A FUNDAMENTAL LAW. IT THEREFORE BELONGS TO THEM TO ASCERTAIN US" MEANING. AS WELL AS THE MEANING OF ANY PARTICULAR ACT PROCEEDING FROM THE LEGISLATIVE BODY." I GLADLY ACCEPT THIS FROM ONE OF THE FOUNDING FATHERS OF THIS GREAT REPUBLIC. DOES ROBERT BORK ACCEPT... | |
 | Stephen L. Schechter - 1990 - 478 páginas
...constitution is in fact, and must be, regarded by the judges as a fundamental law. It therefore belongs to them to ascertain its meaning as well as the meaning...legislative body. If there should happen to be an irreconcileable variance between the two, that which has the superior obligation and validity ought... | |
 | Drucilla Cornell, Michel Rosenfeld, David Gray Carlson - 1992 - 428 páginas
...constitution is, in fact, and must be regarded by the judges, as a fundamental law. It therefore belongs to them to ascertain its meaning, as well as the meaning...particular act proceeding from the legislative body." In normal circumstances the presumption was in favor of the congruence or concordance between foundation... | |
 | Harvey Flaumenhaft - 1992 - 340 páginas
...regarded by the judges. To them, therefore, it belongs to ascertain the meaning of the constitution as well as the meaning of any particular act proceeding from the legislative body. The fundamental law is the highest law. The obligation and validity of the constitution is, of course,... | |
 | United States. Congress. Senate. Committee on the Judiciary - 1992 - 1148 páginas
...by the judges, as a fundamental law. It therefore belongs to them to ascertain its meaning, as veil as the meaning of any particular act proceeding from the legislative body. The legislative branch remains the principle source of lav and regulation outside the Constitution... | |
 | United States. Congress. Senate. Committee on the Judiciary - 1994 - 706 páginas
...constitution, is, in fact, and must be regarded by the judges as, a fundamental law. It therefore belongs to them to ascertain its meaning as well as the meaning...particular act proceeding from the legislative body * * *. It can be of no weight to say that the courts, on the pretense of a repugnancy [between a legislative... | |
 | George Wescott Carey - 1994 - 220 páginas
...Constitution "is, in fact, and must be regarded by the judges as, a fundamental law," ascertaining its meaning, "as well as the meaning of any particular act proceeding from the legislative body," falls within the province of the judiciary. Consequently, if there is an "irreconcilable variance between... | |
 | St. George Tucker, William Blackstone - 2000 - 3301 páginas
...constitution is in fact, and must be regarded by the judges as a fundamental law. It therefore belongs to them, to ascertain its meaning as well as the meaning...proceeding from the legislative body. If there should hap-- pen to be an irreconcilcable variance between the two, -that which has the superior obligation... | |
 | John P. Kaminski, Richard Leffler - 1998 - 244 páginas
...constitution is in fact, and must be, regarded by the judges as a fundamental law. It therefore belongs to them to ascertain its meaning as well as the meaning...legislative body. If there should happen to be an irreconcileable variance between the two, that which has the superior obligation and validity ought... | |
| |
The interpretation of the laws is the proper and peculiar province of the courts. A constitution is, in fact, and must be regarded by the judges, as a fundamental law. It therefore belongs to them to ascertain its meaning, as well as the meaning of any... 
