...is established by law. (Code Civ. Proc., sec. 1875, subds. 5, 2.) Courts will usually take judicial notice of whatever ought to be generally known within the limits of their jurisdiction. (Brown v. Piper, 91 US 37; 1 Greenl. Ev., 14th ed., sec. 6; Chicago etc. RR Co. v. Warner, 108 I1l....

...example. See post. » Page 48. dilating medium.* ' "In fine," adds Greenleaf," "courts will generally 195 take notice of whatever ought to be generally known within the limits of their jurisdiction." All matters of this description, therefore, do not need to be alleged, or enlarged upon, as facts,...

...commonlv known. Amos v. Moseley, LHA1918C, 482, — Fla. —, 77 So. 619. f. Courts will, in general, take notice of whatever ought to be generally known within the limits of their jurisdiction. Grimes v. Eddy, 20 LRA 038, 126 Mo. 168, 28 8. W. 75è; Ex parte Butts. 44 LRA(NS-) 629, 69 Tex. Crim....

...abandonment of its easement in the land occupied by such elevator or warehouse. Courts will, as a rule, take notice of whatever ought to be generally known within the limits of their jurisdiction, and we may well take judicial notice of the fact that the handling and transportation of grain constitute...

...not, therefore, be proved. "In fine," says Chief Judge Hunt in Swinnerton v. Insurance Go., 37 NY 174, ''courts will generally take notice of whatever ought to be generally known within (he limits of their jurisdiction; and where the memory of the judge is at fault he may resort to such...

...business and the common methods by which it Is transacted." 7 Ericyc. of Evidence, p. 934. They note "whatever ought to be generally known within the limits of their jurisdiction." Simpson v. Pittsburg Glass Co., 28 Ind. App. 352, 62 NB 753; 1 Hogate's Pleading and Practice, f 353....