...attack is made, nor attempt to prove any irregularity in the proceedings. As a general rale, Courts will take notice of whatever ought to be generally known within the limits of their jurisdiction. They take notice who fill the various county offices within their jurisdiction. (Wetherbee v. Dunn,...

...ordinary course of business and the common methods by which it is transacted." 7 Ency. Ev. 935. They note "whatever ought to be generally known within the limits of their jurisdiction." Simpson v. Pittsburg, etc., Glass Co. (1902), 28 Ind. App. 343. See, also, 1 Hogate, Pl. and Pr. §353....

...and 6, the author enumerates many of these. Further, he adds as a general proposition : " In fine, courts will generally take notice of whatever ought...generally known within the limits of their jurisdiction." (Brown v. Piper, 91 US 37.) While this will undoubtedly be accepted as an accurate statement of the...

...not in conflict with federal or State legislation, have the force of positive law,"1 and "Courts will take notice of whatever ought to be generally known within the limits of their jurisdiction,"2 there ought to be no question as to the unqualified right to use gas compressors. However,...

...lines of the counties." Subdivision 30 of the same section provides that the courts shall take judicial notice "of whatever ought to be generally known within the limits of the courts jurisdiction." Subdivision 49 of the same section provides for like judicial notice "of...

...is the duty of courts judicially to know the general course of the transactions of human life, and whatever ought to be gene-rally known within the limits of their jurisdiction, eg the peculiar nature of lotteries and the mode in which they are carried on. Salmon v. State, 28...

...knowledge of the court. The more modern idea is expressed in the language of Mr. Greenleaf when he says: "Courts will generally take notice of whatever ought...known within the limits of their jurisdiction." (1 Greenleaf on Evidence, sec. 6.) Again, that author says : "Courts will also judicially recognize the...

...such fact. Neville v. Kenney, 125 Ala. 149; City of Chicago v. Williams, 254 111. 364, 365. "A court will generally take notice of whatever ought to be generally known within the limits of its jurisdiction." See, also, 1 Phillips on Evidence, p. 625; 12 Am. & Eng. Ency. of Law, 151; an exhaustive...

...to the plaintiff, but courts take judicial notice of the general customs and usages of merchants and of whatever ought to be generally known within the limits of their jurisdiction; and the court concludes: "We think that the system by which nearly all the banks in this country transact...

...provide adequate, or indeed any, compensation for such results. This is a matter of common knowledge, and "courts will generally take notice of whatever ought...generally known within the limits of their jurisdiction." Greenl. Ev. § 6. It furnished the ground upon which the plaintiff in this case asks the court, through...