...had upon the testimony of an accomplice, unless corroborated by other evidence, tending to connect defendant with the commission of the offense ; and the corroboration is not sufficient if it merely show that the offense was committed, and the circumstances thereof. " Defendant was connected with...

...testimony tending to connect tho defendant with the transaction alleged to have been had with Whitton, and the corroboration is not sufficient if it merely shows the commission of the offense charged.'' This paragraph suggests, at least, that a correct applicable statement of the law be given....

...testimony in the case corroborative of the accomplice's testimony tending to prove the defendant guilty; and the corroboration is not sufficient if it merely shows the commission of the offense, but it must tend to connect the defendant with its commission, and then from all the evidence you must...

...tending to connect the defendant with the commission of the offense; and such corroborative evidence, If It merely shows the commission of the offense, or the circumstances thereof, is not sufficient." It Is to be noted that this statute In terms operates only to prevent convictions...

...on the testimony of an accomplice, unless corroborated by other evidence to connect defendant with the offense, and the corroboration is not sufficient if it merely shows the commisnon of the offense, which was followed by a definition of "accomplice," hut nowhere applying...

...the case corroborative of her testimony, tending to connect defendant with the offense charged ; that corroboration is not sufficient if it merely shows the commission of the offense, but it must tend to connect defendant with its commission, and then, from all the evidence, the jury...

...that she was not technically an " accomplice" within the meaning of the statute which provides that " a conviction cannot be had upon the testimony of an accomplice, unless he be corroborated by such other evidence as tends to connect the defendant with the commission of...

...not as sole evidence of guilt, but as corroboration of the testimony of Elzy, the accomplice. Does it tend to connect the defendant with the commission of the offense, and does it во corroborate the testimony of Elzy, that the jury is thereby convinced, beyond a reasonable...

...sufficiently corroborated under section 399 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, which provides that "A conviction cannot be had upon the testimony of an accomplice, unless he be corroborated by such other evidence as tends to connect the defendant with the commission of...

...corroborate the testimony of the accomplice. Our statute on the subject requires that the corroboration must tend to connect the defendant with the commission of the offense, and is not sufficient "if it merely shows that the offense was committed, and the circumstances thereof."...