...Wheat.). 3M; and note to Williams v. Norris, » U. 8. (12 Wheat.), 117. their validity; or that some ,Ԫ + rbKEͷ a w c y & 6˛6 a ; + x E s: T,)... : ~q r S ɋ v $ & 3H \ G <E Y O I? w x ۜ x " so claimed. It certainly does not appear that in this case the court below decided against the validity...

...not within the second subdivision of § 25 of the Judiciary Act. Neither can it be claimed that any right, privilege or immunity is claimed under the...or authority exercised under the United States, and that the decision of the Supreme Court of Michigan was against any such title, right, privilege or...

...United States. We are, by § 709, Rev. Stat. given jurisdiction over the final judgments of state courts "where any title, right, privilege, or immunity is...title, right, privilege, or immunity specially set up or claimed." The contention of the railroad company is that payment of duties exacted under the statutes...

...validity, or "where any title, right, privilege or immunity fa claimed under the Constitution, ttl US or any treaty, or statute of, or commission held or...or immunity specially set up and claimed, by either parly, under such Constitution, treaty, statute, commission or authority." Because the suit might have...

...the 3d clause of Rev. Stat. § 709. of a "title, right, privilege, or immunity claimed under . . . an authority exercised under the United States, and the...title, right, privilege, or immunity specially set up or claimed." The special right claimed was a right as purchaser under the marshal's sale upon execution...

...because no title, right, privilege, or immunity claimed under the Constitution of the United States, or any treaty or statute of, or commission held, or authority exercised under, the United States, was specifically set up or claimed in the trial court or in the supreme court of the state of Wisconsin...

...review was desired it should have been sought under that clause of the certiorari provision which reads, "or where any title, right, privilege, or immunity is claimed under the Constitution," etc. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA EX REL. WILLIAM F. ARANT v. FRANKLIN K.. LANE, Secretary of the Interior....

...construction of any clause of the Constitution, or of a treaty or statute, or commission held under the United States, and the decision is against the title, right, privilege or exemption specially set up or claimed, etc." It is not enough to give jurisdiction to this court, under...

...title, right, privilege, or immunity specially set up or claimed by the defendant for himself under any statute of, or commission held, or authority exercised under the United States. What he undertook to set up was a claim to the funds made by the United Stales; and in respect to that...

...Or a right must have been claimed nndei the Constitution, or a treaty, or law of, or by virtue of a commission held or authority exercised under, the United States; and the decision must have been against the right so claimed. R. 8., [417] 1*1« 1880. SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES....