Imágenes de páginas
PDF
EPUB

in using Hillard's books, follow the orthogra- will be readily seen by sending for a copy of the phy of Worcester's Dictionary, and that the "Critic Citicised," or Key to Hillard's Readers firm" of Brewer & Tileston are the pub- as they originally appeared. "Our pamphlet," lishers, also, of this late revision of Walker? also, "is worth sending for, if for no other Do they publish, in vindication of "Truth," reason than to show the merits," &c. Who the fact of my never having called on a does not know that there are many passages in teacher, member of the School Board, or Shakespeare not exactly suitable for a school parent of a pupil attending the Boston reader? Why do the publishers of Hillard's schools, or that my agents, or the authors of Readers avail themselves of the many correcany book I publish, have never done so, to tions pointed out in the "Critic Criticised,” ask that the Progressive Speaker might be and yet possess the brazen impudence of callretained? Do Messrs. Brewer & Tileston ing me to an account for so kindly suggesting give notice that the books of the Progressive them? Series follow Webster's orthography, the acknowledged standard throughout this country, and would be in this city were it not for local influences constantly at work? But enough of this.

The general plan of Messrs. Brewer & Tileston is and so, too, it has been the custom of the preceding "firm"- to obtain the privilege of having their publications entered upon the list of books permitted to be used by teachers in a town, and then to announce this as an adoption, " either in part or whole, of Hillard's Series." I refer more particularly to the schools of the city of New York, in which Hillard's books can not be found, probably, in more than one school out of a hundred. Any books may thus be added to the "list" by publishers making application. Hillard's books were partially adopted by the schools of Philadelphia, and displaced almost immediately.

While stating that Hillard's and Worcester's Series are "increasing rapidly," Messrs. B. & T. are careful not to announce that they are decreasing still more so. They refer, in various circulars, to Cleveland, New Bedford, Manchester, Biddeford, Fryeburg, Bangor, and many other towns, as using Hillard's or Worcester's Series, while scarcely a book of either kind can be found in their schools.

On the twenty-first page of Messrs. Brewer & Tileston's pamphlet, David Worcester, Esq., Superintendent of schools, Bangor, Maine, a relative of the author of Worcester's Dictionary and "nominal" author of Worcester's Spellers, gives his approval of Hillard's Series; and, from his recommendation, some persons would naturally suppose those books are now in use in the schools of that city. Hillard's "First Class Reader," the only book of the series ever authorized by the school committee of Bangor, has been lately displaced by the adoption of the "Progressive Speaker;" while Worcester's Speller has been discarded altogether, and the Progressive Speller, in connection with the Progressive Series of Readers, is now in general use in the schools of Bangor.

"Our pamphlet," says the "Teacher," "is worth sending for, if for no other reason than to show the merits of the individual who sets himself up as the critic of Shakespeare, Longfellow, Tennyson, Brown

ng, and Hillard."

That Mr. Hillard is not beyond criticism,

In regard to the "vote of the New Hampshire Board of Education," I need only say, that it adopted all the books of the Progressive Series necessary for the use of the common schools of the State. Few books, comparatively, higher than the Progressive Fourth Reader, ever find their way into the common schools of New England.

In reply to B. & T.'s statement in reference to "Vermont," I will simply remark, that the Board of Education, in adopting the Progressive Series of Readers, could not adopt the Speller, as only a few pages had been electrotyped at the time the decision was made; and therefore the " Vermont Speller" was adopted. The Progressive Speller, however, has since found its way into many of the towns of the State. Worcester's large Speller was also adopted for High schools, but has since been found to be too impractical in its arrangement, and much too expensive, for use.

Maine has now the Progressive Series in use in nearly every town. Massachusetts is divided between the Progressive Series, Sargent's, Town's old, Lovell's, Tower's, Russell's, and a few of Hillard's. Connecticut and Rhode Island are divided in nearly the same proportion as Massachusetts, with Hillard's little in use.

The schools of Providence, Rhode Island, announced as having adopted Hillard's Series, have always used more books of the Progressive Series than they have of Hillard's. Portions of both Series were adopted; but many teachers have discarded Hillard's, even preferring Shakespeare to the compilation of his distinguished Boston compeer. Messrs. B. & T. also claim that Hillard's and Worcester's books are in general use in several other towns, viz: Portland, Augusta, Richmond, Thomaston, Wiscasset, Waldoboro', &c., in some of which only one book of the series is used, while in others but a partial introduction of the series has been made.

Such is the state of book-matters in New England. And since Messrs. B. & T. have referred to the "increased use of Hillard's Series," as being the motive for my issuing the "Even Exchange" circular, or, as termed by Mr. Tileston, the Ellsworth circular, and in the same breath declare that their books are not so "unpopular and declining" as to induce them to make any "wholesale offers of even exchange (see Massachusetts Teacher,

November number, 1862), it will not be unbe- & T. to publish the names of over three towns, coming in me, I trust, again to present proof of in which the Progressive books have been questionable veracity on their part, as they displaced within the past six months by the appear to forget entirely to-day what has taken place but yesterday. The following is a specimen of many letters recently received:

MR. ELLSWORTH.

Dear Sir: * * *

:

WILTON, MAINE, Nov. 3, 1862.

We can have Hillard's Readers and Worcester's Speller put into all our schools at "even exchange." I prefer your Readers and Speller (meaning Town and Holbrook's) although I am obliged to pay for them. Respectfully yours, J. R. EATON.

In the following named towns, the "increased use of Hillard's and Worcester's Series appear to have been seen through a reflector:

WATERBORO', ME., Nov. 6, 1862.

The Committee of this town voted unanimously to

adopt the Progressive Series in place of Hillard's, now in use. (Signed) S. K. HAMILTON, Chairman.

MAYSVILLE, ME., Aug. 25, 1862. We have authorized the use of the Progressive books in the schools of this town, in place of Hil

lard's Series.

[blocks in formation]

STONINGTON, CT., Jan. 20, 1860.

At a meeting of the Board of School Visitors of the town of Stonington, holden at the house of Elder S. S. Griswold. Jan. 20, 1860, for the purpose of examining school books with reference to their introduction into our district schools, it was voted,

1. That there are serious objections to the further

use of Mr. Hillard's Readers in our schools.

2. That we approve of Town and Holbrook's Progressive Series of Readers and their Speller, and recommend their introduction into our schools as soon as practicable.

3.

That those of Hillard's now in the schools be exchanged for Town and Holbrook's. S. S. GRISWOLD,

Chairman of the Board of Visitors.

The names of forty-one other towns, all in New England, where school committees have come to similar conclusions, during the past three months, can be given, if desired, to show the increased popularity of Hillard's and Worcester's Series;" while I challenge B.

adoption and introduction of Hillard's and Worcester's Series, even though gross misrepresentations have been resorted to, and their "Free Circulating Library," in the form of a Worcester's Quarto Dictionary, covers not only the track of every agent in their employ, but the foot-prints of those who have displayed in this respect a generosity worthy of a better

cause.

What reply do Messrs. Brewer & Tileston make, after calling me a "liar," a " publisher of falsehood," one who "garbles," "guilty of that Hillard's Series is on the "decline"? travestying," &c., when it is here so fully proved And what think these high-minded publishers of the "impure mind" of the author of the "Even Exchange," as they meditate on the preceding votes?

The publishers of Hillard's and Worcester's Series must adopt some other mode than "guerrilla warfare," if they would be successful in their present vocation. Until then, the author of "Even Exchange" "will be happy to correspond with committees and teachers" who are desirous of getting rid of poor books foisted upon towns by importuning agents," among whom the following is a fair specimen:

PORTLAND, ME., June 9, 1862. Friend I understand the "firm" of Bazin & Ellsworth have smashed, and that they will not be likely to come up to the letter of their agreement in exchange of Readers. If they do not, you are under no obligations to them. I think you had better let the Progressive slide. I will furnish you Hillard's and Worcester's on EVEN EXCHANGE, if you desire it. * * * I think you would find it to your advantage to take our Readers, or at least not to take the Progres(Signed) GEO. N. JACKSON.

sive.

In my estimate of the total number of pages in Hillard's Readers, an error was inadvertently made in not including the introductory or "other matter" in two books of the series. The number of pages was taken from the last page of each book of both the Progressive Series and Hillard's. The author of the latter, however, it seems did not, for some reason, consider the introductory or "other matter". which, he admits, was prepared by another person-worthy of enumeration with the reading-matter, and hence my mistake. But even with this "other matter," and the blank leaves included, the corresponding numbers of the Progressive Series contain more pages than Hillard's, and, when used, are a saving of eightyeight cents on each entire set of the books.

[ocr errors]
[ocr errors]

"No member of the 'firm' of Swan, Brewer & Tileston," says Truth Vindicated,' "had the least connection with this measure, "(the late enactment by the Legislature of "Maine in regard to school-books), either in "favor of or against it. We knew not that "such an enactment was proposed until it had "been adopted." If Messrs. S., B. & T. intend to say, that they had no interest in the passage of this law; that Mr. Brewer did not visit Au

gusta on that business; that their agent did not cording to the system of morals in which these
use what little influence he could exert to carry gentlemen were schooled? If so, I certainly
the same through the Legislature; that Mr. think that they need the kind sympathy of
Brewer, in his late visit to Lincoln and Knox friends; and I most sincerely commend them
counties, did not assume to be the expounder of to the tender commiseration of those who will
the new law, and attempt, though without suc- teach them a different kind of ethics.
cess, to convince certain school officers that it It will at once occur to the school committees
required an absolute change of books in every and teachers of New England, that Messrs. B.
town not using Hillard's and Worcester's Series, & T.'s pamphlet, and their advertisement in the
and that therefore the Progressive Series, in "Massachusetts Teacher," made their appear-
general use, and giving entire satisfaction, ance at a moment when the authors supposed
throughout the State, could not be established in it impossible for any refutation of their false-
accordance with the true intent and design of hoods and misrepresentations to be prepared,
its provisions, an exposition that could not or any vindication of "Progressive assertions'
have been dreamed of by the Legislature, but made, in time for distribution previous to the
one unwittingly bringing to light a deep-laid opening of the winter schools. However this
scheme to revolutionize the school-books of the may be, I am thankful that the question at issue
State, the main-spring of which is this new does not depend upon the statements and de-
law, and one, too, pointing unmistakably to a nials of Mr. Hillard, Mr. Swan, or Messrs. B.
familiarity with its origin, then, I say, they ut- & T., but upon the comparative merits of the two
ter another deliberate falsehood.
series, which have been rivals for public favor
from infancy to manhood. The Progressive
Series, in keeping with its title, has been con-
stantly growing in favor with the people, and,
within the last twelve months, has so rapidly
"increased in popularity," that it has nearly
or quite doubled its previous yearly sales.

[ocr errors]

Stung with disappointment by the practical workings of this law in Maine, it being directly the reverse of what he anticipated, Mr. Brewer next made a visit to the residence of a member of the New Hampshire Legislature, in order to obtain a similar school-book law to the one recently enacted by the Legislature of Maine, with the necessary emendations to suit his purpose; and he would doubtless have been successful, had not timely warning been given to the true friends of education, and his selfish and interested motives exposed. This is disappointment number two.

It is doubtless because of these signal failures of Messrs. B. and T. to suppress, by law, the use of Town and Holbrook's Progressive Series in the States of Maine and New Hampshire, and to establish the use of Hillard's and Worcester's Series in the same, that they, with all the apparent innocence of "angels of light," so pitifully claim the public sympathy in the very first line of their pamphlet, by stating that "a gratuitous and unprovoked attack" has been made upon them and certain of their publications by the author of "Even Exchange."

I regret the necessity of again appearing before the public in self-defence. But having been personally attacked, and accused of making statements "unqualifiedly untrue," in Messi's. B. & T.'s "mendacious circular," just issued, "I could not rest silent." And I regret still more, that a full and complete vindication of "truth," on my part, seemed to demand a somewhat personal reply.

With all the preceding facts before the public, sustained as they are, on my part, by the most unquestionable testimony, I am quite willing to let every unprejudiced reader decide for himself whether "a gratuitous and unprovoked attack" has been made upon Messrs. B. and T., in the "Even Exchange" circular (or any other ever issued by me), or whether it contains a single "fabrication," or a single " accusation" in which "there is no truth whatever, not even the smallest shadow of truth;" and here I leave the question for the present. OLIVER ELLSWORTH.

Does a deliberate and studied attempt of this nature to do me so great a pecuniary injury, and the schools of these two States a still greater injury, simply because it was unsuccessful, lose its moral turpitude or criminality, ac- BOSTON, Nov., 1862.

172377

1

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, EDUCATION, AND WELFARE

JUN 1 71957

LIBRAN

« AnteriorContinuar »