Imágenes de páginas

Chemical mace should be used only if physical strength and skill are
ineffective or impractical.

In instances where physical strength and skill or mace are ineffective or their use might constitute a danger to the officer or a third party, the officer is justified in using the baton or sap to overcome resistance and to end the conflict.

The application of the baton is considered the most drastic form of
nondeadly force. It must be used judiciously and only if lesser methods
have failed or their use would be impractical.34 As a basic rule,
firearms should be utilized only (original emphasis) in self-defense or in
defense of another against death or grievous bodily harm.35

[ocr errors]


1. National Advisory Commission on Criminal Justice Standards and Goals, Police (Washington, D.C.: Government Printing Office, 1973), p. 18. 2. U.S. Commission on Civil Rights, Who Is Guarding the Guardians? (October

1981), p. 37.

3. Paul Takagi, "A Garrison State in a 'Democratic Society,' " Crime and

Social Justice, (Summer 1974), p. 30, note 1. The issue of police shootings

is surveyed in John S. Goldkamp, "Minorities as Victims of Police Shootings:

Interpretations of Racial Disproportionatlity and Police Use of Deadly Force," The Justice System Journal, Vol. II, Issue 2 (Winter 1976), pp. 169-83. 4. Model Penal Code, sec. 1307(2)(b)(i)(IV)(Proposed Official Draft, 1962).

5. Neb. Rev. Stat. sec. 28-834, 1972.

6. Omaha World-Herald, Jan. 29, 1974.

7. Omaha World-Herald, June 14, 1974.

8. Omaha World-Herald, June 12, 1974.

9. Omaha World-Herald, June 10, 1974.

10. Landrum v. Moats, No. 77-1656, (8th Cir. May 30, 1978).

11. Landrum v. Moats, No. 75-0-440, (D. Neb. Feb. 8, 1979).

12. Omaha World-Herald, June 1, 1976.

13. Omaha World-Herald, June 8, 1976.

14. Omaha World-Herald, Jan. 25, 1977 and Sept. 24, 1979.

15. Data supplied by Omaha Police Division, on file at CSRO. 16. Omaha World-Herald, Sept. 21, 1979; Sept. 24, 1979.

17. Data provided by the Omaha Police Division, on file at CSRO.

18. Omaha World-Herald, Oct. 18, 1981.

19. Omaha World-Herald, Feb. 24, 1982.

20. Omaha Police Manual, Vol. I, Pers. 2-3, p. 2, March 1981.

21. Omaha Police Manual, Vol. I, Pers. 2-2, p. 2 (Rev.) Sept. 1975.

22. Neb. Rev. Stat. sec. 28-839, 1972.

23. Jack Swanson, interview in Omaha, Dec. 9, 1981.

24. George Ernce, interview in Omaha, Dec. 10, 1981.

25. A.B. Hogan, interview in Omaha, May 27, 1981.

26. Clyde Christian, telephone interview, Nov. 12, 1981.

27. Wilda Stephenson, telephone interview, Nov. 17, 1981.

28. Wayne Tyndall, telephone interview, Nov. 5, 1981.

29. Omaha World-Herald, Aug. 22, 1977; Oct. 26, 1977.

30. Omaha World-Herald, Oct. 23, 1980; Oct. 25, 1980; Oct. 27, 1980.

31. Omaha World-Herald, July 15, 1981.

32. Tappan v. Coufal, No. 81-0-0367 (D. Neb. July 14, 1981).

33. Model Rules for Law Enforcement Officers, A Manual on Police Discretion

(IACP, 1974), pp. 138-39.

34. Ibid., pp. 140-42.

35. Ibid., p. 143.



The information collected by the Advisory Committee and others indicates a

profound disparity in perception of police activity.

Past Community Attitudes

Minority complaints about police behavior and hostility to the police have

a long history. The earliest reports of it in the files of the Omaha Public

Library date back to 1965.

In October 1965 Homer C. Floyd, executive director of the city human

relations board, reported that "tremendous hostility" against the police was developing among the black residents of northside Omaha.1 A list of

grievances was developed by the Northside Police-Community Relations Council

whose members included Ernest Chambers, William Mitchell, Mrs. Robert Gibson,

Rev. Wilkinson Harper and George Crenshaw. These focused on lack of police

courtesy toward blacks--referring to them as "nigger", "boy", "gal"'; arrests without apparent justification; use of force as a result of verbal abuse or to

obtain information or to punish a suspected offender; random searches without

apparent cause; harassment by the vice squad; harassment and intimidation of

children on the streets; placement of radar in places that interfere with

private businesses; failure to process complaints; failure to respond to calls

for assistance from the black community; and, failure to respond to citizen requests for information about arrests.2 The police division either stated these accusations were not justified or offered a legal explanation for the practice. 3


ly 1966, the views of the black community again became of interest to

the media in the aftermath of a weekend of civil unrest. Many concerns were

cited as causing the riots. Demands presented to the city by blacks after the riot included "a change in police attitudes.114

In March 1968 black leaders again complained that an officer who fatally

shot a black youth inside a looted pawnshop was not suspended during the

investigation and that police used their clubs and mace indiscriminantly against black demonstrators at a George Wallace rally.5 Later in that month

a black youth was charged with criminal libel when he distributed a handbill accusing two officers of being racists and using excessive force. 6 A report

by the city's human relations board, published in June 1968, stated that "it

is a simple fact that most Negro citizens do not believe that we have equal law enforcement.....7

Also in 1969 a black organization called "The Matched Sets" conducted an

extensive survey of black opinion in which it interviewed 641 black residents

of the northside and 51 white residents of the area.

The results were

reported separately for older people (361 persons) and younger people, under

the age of 19 (331 persons). Three-quarters of the younger people thought the police were not courteous. Over 60 percent had heard of incidents of police

brutality and more than three-quarters believed the police used excessive and

un justified force. A little less than half thought the 1968 riots were

justified. A little more than half did not think police-community relations

had improved in the past few years. Over 60 percent of the older people interviewed thought the police were not courteous. Over 80 percent had heard of incidents of police brutality and 60 percent believed the police used

excessive and sometimes un justified force.

About 70 percent of those

[ocr errors]

interviewed thought the 1968 riots were justified. About half thought that


police-community relations had not improved in the past few years.


Police Chief Richard Andersen asserted that out of 140,000 cases involving

police contact with citizens in a one year period, only 10 resulted in complaints of police mistreatment.9

In early 1970 two incidents of alleged police abuse were reported to the city's human relations board. 10 In August 1970 the bombing death of a white

« AnteriorContinuar »