92. 1178 trial judge.-Continental Gin Co. v. Gardner, | "Conspiracy."-Slaven v. Commonwealth (Ky.) V. Creasey Corporation (B) Cross-Examination and Re-examina tion. is 267 (Tex.Civ.App.) Cross-examination largely in trial judge's discretion.-Cresson v. Wortham-Carter Pub. Co., 1077. 268(1) (Tex.Cr.App.) Cross-examination of defendant's wife as to whether she used money extorted from defendant to buy automobile held proper.-Simmons v. State, 392. 268 (8) (Tex. Civ. App.) Cross-examination held proper, in view of testimony on direct.Cresson v. Wortham-Carter Pub. Co., 1077. 268(13) (Tex.Civ.App.) Cross-examination properly limited.-St. Louis, B. & M. Ry. Co. v. Lane, 59. 269(1) (Tex. Civ. App.) Cross-examination not confined to questions on direct.-Cresson v. Wortham-Carter Pub. Co., 1077. 270(2) (Ky.) Cross-examination as to disposition made by witness of whisky transported by accused is immaterial.-Delong v. Commonwealth, 839. 271(4) (Tex.Civ.App.) Permitting reading of excerpts from report before its introduction on cross-examination of plaintiff not improper.-Cresson v. Wortham-Carter Pub. Co., 1077. 2822 (Ark.) It is in court's discretion to prevent repetition in taking testimony.-National Union Fire Ins. Co. of Pittsburgh, Pa., v. Whitted, 560. 287(4) (Tex.Cr.App.) Redirect examination as to statement in conversation partly developed on cross-examination not error.-Simmons v. State, 392. IV. CREDIBILITY, CON IMPEACHMENT, TRADICTION, AND CORROBORATION. (D) Inconsistent Statements by Witness. C383 (Tex.Cr.App.) Cannot be impeached by proof of contradiction upon immaterial matter. Smith v. State, 685. (E) Contradiction and Corroboration of Witness. 4051) (Tex.Civ.App.) Exclusion of testimony as to injury to spine in action for injury to hip and ankle, not error.-El Paso Electric Ry. Co. v. Cowan, 442. WORDS AND PHRASES. "Accessory after the fact."-Wood v. State (Ark.) 568. "Accomplice."-Dennison V. Commonwealth (Ky.) 880. "Addled."-Windham v. State (Tex. Cr. App.) 51. "Barn."-Williams v. Carr (Mo. App.) 625. "Bill of lading."-Hines v. Scott (Tex. Com. "Bona fide purchaser."-Shear Co. v. Stuth V. Stucker (Mo. App.) 1003. "Connecting carrier."-St. Louis. B. & M. Ry. Voudouris (Tex. Civ. App.) 810. Bank V. "Consideration deemed valuable."-Adams Williams (Tex. Com. App.) 673. 214. "Contract."-Lewis (Ky.) 1046. "Contract for sale of real estate."-Oliver v. "Course of employment."-Western Indemnity 892. "Engaged in military service in time of war. "General damages."-Moss Jellico Coal Co. v. "Heirs after her."-Shugart v. Shugart (Tex. "Heirs of their body."-Shugart v. Shugart 177. 336. "Incompetent."-Farmers' Mill & Elevator Co. Com "Judgment."-Fort Worth Acid Works v. City "Mash tub."-State v. Hyde (Mo.) 920. County V. Crooker "Person."-Anderson v. Grand Lodge, United Brothers of Friendship of Texas (Tex. Civ. App.) 461. "Produced."-Enfield v. Woods (Ky.) 842. v. "Proximate cause."-Dunn v. Central State Hospital (Ky.) 216. For cases in Dec.Dig. & Am.Dig. Key-No.Series & Indexes see same topic and KEY-NUMBER "Public building."-Haag v. State (Tex. Cr. "Term."-Foreman Automobile Co. v. Morris App.) 1075. "Transport."-West v. State (Tex. Cr. App.) (Ky.) 486. 371. "Purport."-State v. Collins (Mo.) 599. "Quasi."-Baker v. Stucker (Mo. App.) 1003. "Real property."Harp v. Brookshire (Ky.) "Transporting."-West v. State (Tex. Cr. App.) 177. "Reconversion."-Turner v. Hine (Mo.) 933. "Remainder."-Weller v. Dinwiddie (Ky.) 874. "Remote cause."-Dunn v. Central State Hospital (Ky.) 216. "Robbery."-Howard v. Commonwealth (Ky.) 1059. "Rule in Shelley's Case."-McHatton's Estate v. Peale's Estate (Tex. Cr. App.) 103. "Sale."-Liberto v. Sanders (Tex. Civ. App.) 120. "Securities."-Lewis v. Creasey Corporation (Ky.) 1046. "Special damages."-Moss Jellico Coal Co. v. American Ry. Express Co. (Ky.) 508. "Surface water."-Brown v. St. Louis & E. F. Ry. Co. (Mo. App.) 12. "Swindling."-Cochrain App.) 43. 371. "Unconditional commutation of the policy for nonforfeitable paid-up insurance."-Dempsey v. John Hancock Mut. Life Ins. Co. (Mo. App.) 17. "Valued as other property is valued for assessment."-City of Waco v. Texas Life Ins. Co. (Tex. Com. App.) 315. WORKMEN'S COMPENSATION ACTS. See Master and Servant, ~375–417. WRIT OF ERROR. See Appeal and Error. WRITS. V. State (Tex. Cr. See Attachment: Certiorari; Execution; Gar "Tenor."-State v. Collins (Mo.) 599. nishment: Habeas Corpus: Injunction; Process; Prohibition: Quo Warranto. L 829.2 |