Reports of Cases at Law and in Chancery Argued and Determined in the Supreme Court of Illinois, Volumen241 |
Otras ediciones - Ver todas
Términos y frases comunes
affirmed agreement alleged amended amount appellant's Appellate Court appellee assessment averments Belleville bill Brickey canal commissioners Chicago river circuit court city of Chicago claim complainant construction conveyance conveyed Cook county corporation court of Cook court of equity death declaration decree deed defendant in error delivered the opinion demurrer Desplaines river dismissed dominant estate easement east evidence executed fact fee simple feeder filed October 26 Fisk street granted grantor heirs Huey Illinois injury instruction John joint tenancy judgment jury Kankakee river land lease liability Lumber marriage ment navigable negligence October 26 Opinion filed October owner parties person plaintiff in error plat plea possession premises purchase purpose question Railroad Co Railroad Company Railway real estate record remainder rule scire facias South Branch statute stream suit switch track tenants thereof tion transactions trust water power
Pasajes populares
Página 35 - ... and the act, neglect or default is such as would (if death had not ensued) have entitled the party injured to maintain an action and recover damages in respect thereof, then and in every such case the person who would have been liable if death had not ensued shall be liable to an action for damages notwithstanding the death of the person injured . . . Section 2.
Página 255 - The question always is, was there an unbroken connection between the wrongful act and the injury, — a continuous operation? Did the facts constitute a continuous succession of events, so linked together as to make a natural whole, or was there some new and independent cause intervening between the wrong and the injury?
Página 42 - Richardson as indorser, and at the same time and as a part of the same transaction, the mortgage in question was executed as security therefor.
Página 249 - The question raised by the brief and argument of counsel is whether the trial court erred in refusing to direct a verdict for the defendant.
Página 538 - This case is an apt illustration of the wisdom of the rule requiring such anticipations to be proven by evidence so cogent as to leave no reasonable doubt in the mind of the court, that the transaction occurred substantially as stated.
Página 46 - ... hereby covenant and agree to and with the party of the first part...
Página 278 - He owes to his client the duty of fidelity, but he also owes the duty of good faith and honorable dealing to the judicial tribunals before whom he practices his profession. He is an officer of the court, — a minister in the temple of justice. His high vocation is to correctly inform the court upon the law and the facts of the case, and to aid it in doing justice and arriving at correct conclusions.
Página 206 - It is next contended that the court erred in refusing to set aside the verdict, because...
Página 163 - ... degree of care for his own safety that an ordinarily prudent person would have exercised, under the same circumstances...
Página 110 - If the jury believe from the evidence that any witness who has testified in this case has knowingly and willfully testified falsely to any material fact in...