Imágenes de páginas
PDF
EPUB
[ocr errors]

The Committee on Insurance made the following report:

MR. SPEAKER:

Your Committee on Insurance, to whom was referred Senate Bill No. 221, introduced by Senator Morgan, have had the same under consideration, and beg leave to report the same back to the House with the recommendation that said bill do pass.

W. A. WILSON,

Chairman.

Engrossed Senate Bill No. 221 was read a second time and ordered printed.

Engrossed Senate Bill No. 108 was read a third time.

Mr. Swope moved to refer to a committee of one for amend

ments.

Which motion prevailed.

Mr. Swope was appointed as a committee.

Engrossed House Bill No. 384 was read a third time and put upon its passage.

The question being, Shall the bill pass?

The roll was called and resulted as follows:

Those voting in the affirmative were:

Messrs. Askren, Atkinson, Bain, Baugher, Beane, Behymer, Blue, Brown, Cooley, Cravens, Creigmile, Cullop, Cunningham, Dailey, Davis, Deery, Duncan, Erwin, Farlow, Fippen, Foster, Gill, Gregg, Haggard, Hamrick, Hay, Heagy, Hesler, Higbee, Hunter, Jordan, Kamp, Kauffman, Kester, Lowe, Lyons, Megenity, Meredith, Moutoux, McCallister, McCaskey, McCorkle, McMullen, Newlin, Passage, Richter, Rodabaugh, Schaff, Smith, Stakebake, Stark, Stephenson, Stover, Suchanek, Sulzer, Swope, Teal, Terhune, Thornton, Van Buskirk, Vermillion, Williams, Wilson of Dubois and Martin, Wilson of Marion, Wright, Mr. Speaker. Total, 66.

Those voting in the negative were:

Mr. Blair. Total, 1.

So the bill passed.

The question, being, Shall the title of the bill as read stand as the title of the act?

It was so ordered.

The Clerk was instructed to inform the Senate of the passage of the bill.

Mr. Haggard offered the following House Resolution No. 75, and moved its adoption.

WHEREAS, It has been reported that members of this House have lost personal property left in the cloak-room during the session; and,

WHEREAS, It seems that the cloak-room is not as thoroughly protected as it should be, owing to the fact that the Doorkeeper has hitherto acted upon the strained assumption that other people are as honest as the members of this House; be it,

Resolved, That the Doorkeeper of this House be instructed to hereafter so distribute his force that it will be efficient in the preservation of the personal property rights of members. HAGGARD.

Which was adopted.

House Bill No. 220 was read a second time and ordered engrossed.

Engrossed House Bill No. 366 was read a third time and put upon its passage.

The question being, Shall the bill pass?

The roll was called and resulted as follows:

Those voting in the affirmative were:

Messrs. Askren, Atkinson, Bain, Baugher, Beane, Behymer, Brown, Creigmile, Dailey, Davis, Deery, Dinwiddie, Duncan, Erwin, Fippen, Foster, Gill, Gregg, Grossart, Haggard, Hamrick, Hay, Heagy, Hesler, Higbee, Hunter, Johnson of Marion, Jordan, Kamp, Kauffman, Kester, Lowe, Lyons, Manwaring, Meredith, Merritt, Moutoux, McCallister, McCaskey, McCorkle, McMullen, Newlin, Passage, Richter, Schaff, Sexton, Stark, Stephenson, Stover, Suchanek, Sulzer, Swope, Teal, Terhune, Van Buskirk, White, Wilson of Marion. Total, 57.

Those voting in the negative were:

Messrs. Blair, Blue, Cooley, Cunningham, Farlow, Megenity, Rodabaugh, Smith, Stakebake, Thornton, Williams, Wilson of Dubois and Martin, Wright, Mr. Speaker. Total, 14.

So the bill passed.

The question being, Shall the title of the bill as read stand as the title of the act.

It was so ordered.

The Clerk was instructed to inform the Senate of the sage of the bill.

The Committee on Roads made the following report:

MR. SPEAKER:

pas

Your Committee on Roads, to which was referred House Bill No. 262, introduced by Mr. Cunningham, have had the same under consideration, and beg leave to report the same back to the House with the recommendation that said bill be indefinitely postponed.

D. W. HEAGY,
Chairman.

The bill was read a second time, the report of the committee was concurred in and the further consideration of said bill indefinitely postponed.

The Committee on Roads made the following report:

MR. SPEAKER:

Your Committee on Roads, to which was referred House Bill No. 272, introduced by Mr. Dailey, have had the same under consideration, and beg leave to report the same back to the House with the recommendation that said bill be indefinitely postponed.

D. W. HEAGY,
Chairman.

The report of the committee was not concurred in and the bill re-referred to the Committee on Roads.

The Committee on Fees and Salaries made the following report:

MR. SPEAKER:

Your Committee on Fees and Salaries, to which was referred House Bill No. 45, introduced by Mr. Johnson, of Marion, have had the same under consideration, and beg leave to report the same back to the House with the recommendation. that said bill be indefinitely postponed.

FIPPEN,
Chairman.

The bill was read a second time.

Mr. Johnson, of Marion, moved to lay the report on the table.

Mr. Dailey demanded the previous question.

The question being, Shall the demand for the previous ques. tion be seconded?

The demand was seconded.

The question being, Shall the report of the committee be laid on the table.

The report was not laid on the table.

The report of the committee was concurred in and the further consideration of said bill indefinitely postponed.

The Committee on Fees and Salaries made the following report:

MR. SPEAKER:

Your Committee on Fees and Salaries, to which was referred House Bill No. 149, introduced by Mr. McMullen, have had the same under consideration, and beg leave to report the same back to the House with the recommendation that said bill be indefinitely postponed.

FIPPEN,

Chairman.

The bill was read a second time, the report of the committee. concurred in and the further consideration of said bill indefinitely postponed.

40-HOUSE JOUR.

The Committee on Fees and Salaries made the following report:

MR. SPEAKER:

Your Committee on Fees and Salaries, to whom was referred Engrossed Senate Bill No. 76, introduced by Mr. Morgan, have had the same under consideration, and beg leave to report the same back to the House with the recommendation that said. bill be amended as follows, to wit:

A bill for an act fixing the salaries of County Commissioners, prescribing penalties, and declaring an emergency.

SECTION 1. Be it enacted by the General Assembly of the State of Indiana, That in all counties having a population, as shown by the last census prior to the taking effect of this act, of not less than sixty-five thousand (65,000), and also having not less than twenty civil townships, the County Commissioners shall each receive for his services as such Commissioner the sum of one thousand ($1.000) dollars per annum, to be paid quarterly out of the County Treasury, and no more; such salary of one thousand ($1,000) dollars shall be in lieu of all per diem allowance, and in full payment for all services rendered and expenses incurred in the discharge of their duties as such Commissioners.

SEC. 2. It shall be unlawful for any such County Commissioners to receive any sum in addition to the above, or join in making any allowance, either in favor of himself or other person, for such services and expenses in excess of said sum of one thousand dollars.

SEC. 3. Such Commissioners shall meet at the Court House or Auditor's office in such county on the first Mondays in the months of January, February, March, April, May, June, July, August, September, October, November and December in each year, and shall sit for not less than ten (10) days in each month and may sit twenty-four (24) days in each month if the business of the term requires it.

SEC. 4. Any County Commissioner violating any of the provisions of this act shall, upon conviction thereof, be fined in any sum not less than fifty nor more than one thousand dollars, to which may be added immprisonment in the penitentiary for any period not less than one nor more than three years.

« AnteriorContinuar »