« AnteriorContinuar »
fifty thousand, and three thousand, and six hundred. And he set threescore and ten thousand of them to be bearers of burdens, and fourscore thousand to be hewers in the mountains, and three thousand and six hundred overseers, to set the people to work.”
The overseers I suppose to bave been Israelites, the rest strangers or proselytes; as they are called in the Greek version of the Seventy, and in St. Jerom's Latin version. Many of these strangers may have been remains of the Gibeonites; but I presume there were others besides.
Nethinims are mentioned, 1 Chr. ix. 2, “ Now the first inhabitants that dwelt in their possessions, in their cities, were the Israelites, the Priests, the Levites, and the Nethinims." They, and Solomon's servants, are often mentioned in the books of Ezra and Nehemiah. In the catalogue of the people that returned from Babylon it is said, Ezr. ii. 58, " All the Nethinims, and the children of Solomon's servants, were three hundred ninety and two.” So also Neh. vii. 60, and Ezr, viii. 20, “ Also the Nethinims, whom David and the princes had appointed for the service of the Levites, two hundred and twenty."
These Netbinims had been given the Levites, to serve them. Afterwards Solomon appointed more for the like service. These must have been strangers or proselytes. It is not to be thought that David, or Solomon, or any king of Israel, with the elders, bad power to give Israelites to the service of the Levites. · As some Jews said to our Lord : “ We be Abraham's seed, and never were in bondage to any man,” John viii. 33. No, they were free-born, and high born, in comparison of other men ; though they were little concerned for the freedom of which our Lord was speaking. Says Patrick upon 2 Chr. ix. 2, Ezra gives a good account • of the Nethinims, ch. viii. 20, where he informs us, they • were given by David to the Levites, (which is the original
of their name,) as the Levites were given by God to help • the priests; and therefore in all places they are mentioned with holy persons.'
I do not know whether these men may be called inferior clergy. They seem rather to have been servants to them. But however mean their original, or low and laborious their employment may have been; the people of Israel were indebted to them for their zeal for the house of God. Many of them readily returned from Babylon to Judea, and performed their part for upholding the worship of God at his temple.
As all the land of Canaan was given to the twelve tribes, the children of Israel, and many of the regulations in the law of Moses were in their favour; it was foreseen, that strangers, who joined themselves to them, and came to sojourn among them, would lie under some disadvantages. God therefore, who wisely made those appointments of the law of Moses regarding the descendants of Jacob, in his great goodness, made provisions likewise for strangers, that they might not be abused.
The people of Israel, to whom the laws of Moses were delivered, are charged in this manner. Ex.xxii. 20,“ Thou sbalt neither vex a stranger, nor oppress him; for ye were strangers in the land of Egypt.”. Comp. Lev. xix. 33, 34. and Ex. xxiji. 12, “ Six days shalt thou do thy work, and on the seventh day thou shalt rest; that thy ox and thy ass may rest, and the son of thy handmaid, and the stranger may be refreshed :" see there ver. 9. Lev. xix, 9, 10, “ And when ye reap the harvest of your landthou shalt not gather the gleaning of thy harvest. And thou shalt not glean thy vineyard. Thou shalt leave them for the poor, and the stranger. I am the Lord your God.” See also Lev. xxv, 5, 6, and 38; and Deut. xvi. 13, 14, “ Thou shalt observe the feast of tabernacles seven days, after that thou hast gathered in thy corn and thy wine. And thou shalt rejoice in thy feast, thou, and thy son, and thy daughter, and thy man servant, and thy maid servant, and the Levite, the stranger, and the fatherless, and the widow that are in thy gates." And again, very particularly, Deut. xxvi. 11–13, “ And thou shalt rejoice in every good thing, wbich the Lord thy God hath given unto thee, and unto thy house, thou, and the Levite, and the stranger that is among you. When thou hast made an end of tithing all the tithes of thy increase and bast given it unto the Levite, and the stranger, the fatherless and the widow, that they may eat within thy gates, and be filled. Then thou shalt say before the Lord thy God; I have brought away the hallowed things out of my house, and also have given them unto the Levite, and unto the stranger, and the fatherless, and the widow, according to thy commandment.” These instances of kindness are strongly enforced, Deut. x. 17-19.
I shall add a text or two, somewhat different, though still to the like purpose. Deut. xii. 12, “ And ye shall rejoice before the Lord your God, ye and your sons, and your daughters, and your men-servants,
and your maid-servants, and the Levite that is within your gates. Forasmuch as he bas no part, nor inheritance with you." And ver. 18, “ Thou must eat them before the Lord thy God, in the place which the Lord thy God shall choose, thou, and thy son, and thy daughter, and thy man-servant, and thy maid-servant, and the Levite that is within thy gates." See also Deut. x. 9.
By “ stranger,” and “ stranger within thy gates, and the stranger that sojourneth with thee, [or] in thy land,” I always understand proselytes, men circumcised according to the law of Moses ; or, as they are now often called,
proselytes of the covenant, [or] of righteousness.' If the Levites are said “ to have no inheritance,” and are styled “ Levites within thy gates," as they are in some texts just cited, though there were allotted to them cities, with their suburbs, out of the inheritance of the other tribes, as is manifest from Nụmb. xxxv. 1-8, and Josh. xiv. 1-5, all strangers, though circumcised, and admitted to full communion in all religious ordinances, may well be called “ sojourners, and the strangers within thy gates."
Once more. As God in his laws, delivered to the chil. dren of Israel, was not unmindful of the stranger; so likewise does David remember them in bis devotions. Ps. cxv. 9—13, “ O Israel trust thou in the Lord. O house of Israel trust thou in the Lord. Ye that fear the Lord, trust in the Lord. The Lord will bless the house of Israel : he will bless the house of Aaron. He will bless them that fear the Lord, both small and great,” cxviii. 2—4,“ Let Israel now say, that his mercy endureth for ever. Let the house of Aaron now say, that his mercy endureth for ever. Let them that fear the Lord say, that his mercy endureth for ever." Ps. cxxxv. 19, 20, “ Bless the Lord, O house of Israel. Bless the Lord, O house of Aaron. Bless the Lord, 0 house of Levi. Ye that fear the Lord, bless the Lord.”.
These men, who fear the Lord, mentioned after all the divisions of the people of Israel, I suppose to have been strangers, or proselytes. Hereby we are led to understand St. Paul's address in the synagogue at Antioch in Pisidia. Acts xiii. 16, “ Men of Israel, and ye that fear God, give audience.” And ver. 26, “ Men and brethren, children of the stock of Abraham, and whoever among you feareth God, to you is the word of this salvation sent." Here, by them that feared God, must be meant proselytes. For that none were present, but such as were Jews, either by birth or religion, appears from ver. 42, and what there follows.
Proselytes are mentioned among the hearers of St. Peter's first sermon, preached at Jerusalem, after our Lord's ascension. Acts il. 10. I suppose proselytes to be meant by Grecians here, cb. vi. 1, and ix. 29.
Who they were, we cannot say exactly. But there might be many such men in Judea, and in other countries all over the world, where the Jewish people resided. Some of them may have been descendants of such as had joined themselves to the people of Israel in former times; and others may have been new converts to the Jewish religion.
I have imagined, that proselytes now living in Judea, who were poor, may bave been chiefly, or for the most part, servants of the Roman governors, or of their officers; who having come into Judea with their masters, were converted to the Jewish religion; and, when their masters returned home, got leave to stay behind. Having renounced gentilism, they could not expect very agreeable treatment from their friends and relatives at home. And though they had not the prospect of any considerable advantage in Judea, yet they might hope for civilities among those, whose religion they had embraced. Besides, new converts have a great deal of zeal. Some of them might conceive a particular affection for the land of Israel, and the city of Jerusalem, where was the temple.
Beside the servants of Roman officers, who had resided in Judea, probably, there were others, who had served Jews out of Judea ; who, having for some reasons left their masters, chose to come, and seek subsistence in Judea, not being willing to serve beathens.
There might be also divers other persons of different stations, who being converted to Judaism, preferred Jerusalem to all other places.
Nicolas, chosen to be one of the seven, a proselyte of Antioch, now at Jerusalem, was, very probably, a man of good substance. And it is observable, that Helena, queen of the Adiabenes, not long after her conversion went to? Jerusalem. And she must have often visited that city, or resided there very much. For she was there, when her son Izates m died. And several of the brothers and sons of Izates" were sbut in at the last siege of Jerusalem.
That therefore is my third and last argument, that these Grecians were proselytes; forasmuch as upon their complaints a proselyte was chosen to be one of the seven, to preside in the daily ministration, even Nicolas of Antioch. The rest, I presume, were Hebrews, that is, Jews by birth, descendants of the patriarchs. Some of whom may have been born in Judea, others of them out of it, but were now at Jerusalem,
It is no sufficient reason to believe that any of the rest I Jos. Ant. l. 20. ii. 6. m Ib. iii. 3. n De B. J. I, 6. vi. 4.
were proselytes, or that all the rest were Jews, who were born in other countries, because their names are Greek. For several of our Saviour's disciples had Greek names, though they were all men of Galilee; as Philip, and Andrew, and Thomas called Didymus, and Simon, called also Cephas, and Peter, by which last name he was generally called, and best known.
That Stephen was a Jew by birth, is highly probable from the whole of his speech before the council, and particularly from the beginning of it. Acts vii. 2, “ Men, brethren, and fathers, hearken. The God of glory appeared to our father Abraham, when he was in Mesopotamia.
Philip, the second of the seven, was a person of great eminence, who first preached the gospel in Samaria, and wrought there many miracles. Acts viii. 1-5. Who also converted the chamberlain, and treasurer of Candace queen of the Ethiopians. There cannot be any reason to make a doubt, whether Philip, so eminent an evangelist, of an order next in authority and dignity to Christ's apostles, was of the seed of Israel. It would be altogether absurd to suppose, that one so early employed in such signal services for promoting the gospel, was only a proselyte.
When the eunuch had been baptized," the spirit of the Lord caught away Philip, that the eunuch saw him no
But Philip was found at Azotus ; and passing through, he preached in all the cities, till he came to Cæsarea, ver, 39, 40. There he seems to have settled. For there he was, when St. Paul came to Jerusalem in the year fifty-eight, as we learn from Acts xxi, 8-10, “ And the next day we came to Cesarea. And we entered into the house of Philip the evangelist, which was one of the seven, and abode there."
Stephen suffered martyrdom soon after he was chosen. Philip likewise, as we perceive, not long after removed from Jerusalem. Indeed, the seven seem to have been appointed upon occasion of a particular emergency. However, the other five, or some of them, may have stayed at Jerusalem, and may have continued to officiate in the service, to which they had been appointed. And moreover, others may have been chosen in the room of Stephen, who died, and of Philip, who removed.
Dr. Whitby upon Acts vi. 1, objects against our opinion from ch. ix. 29; where it is said, “ That Paul disputed against the Grecians; but they went about to slay him.”
Which, as he argues, shows they must be Jews by birth, • and not only strangers of other nations come bither. For