*P. 5. 4. The manner and order of levying of a fine. also is either single, which is such a fine by which The manner and order of suing out or levying of Experientis, levandi Fines 18 E. 1. West. H. 7. 9 Bro. Sym. ut supra. Fine 116. Stat. de modo (19) And this fine, sur done, grant et render, operates as a feoffment and re-enfeoffment, and is the only fine which gives a new estate. See Essay on Fines, 49. The cases there, and post, 18. (20) See further, as to the different kinds of fines, West. Symb. part 2. § 19. Vin. Abr. Fine, (N. b.) For the nature and use of a fine sur concessit, which is a fine executory, and commonly used to grant estates for lives or years, see Chet. 5. 2 Bl. Com. 353. (21) The curious reader will find the ancient manner of levying a fine in Glan. 1. 8. c. 2, 3. (22) See the form of it in Wils. 4. If there is no original writ sued out the fine is not void, but voidable only by writ of error, as is the case also where there is an original writ, and the fine is levied not only of that which is contained in the writ, but also of some other things not contained in the writ. 2 Inst. 513. Vin. Abr. Fine, (F. 2.) 3 Co. 5. Plow. 394. If the sheriff happens to be one of the deforceants, the writ must be directed to the coroner, otherwise it is not good. Cro. Eliz. 300. (23) Accordingly Cro. Eliz. 740. Goburn v. Wright. But it seems, if the writ of covenant and De. po. both bear date on the same day, it is not error. Arundel v. Arundel, ibid. 677. S. P. Herbert v. Binnon, Roll. Rep. 223. Essay on Fines, 61. But it is said the writ of De. po. shall be good, although it bear test before the writ of covenant, and though After the original writ sued forth, there is a præcipe, it recites the writ of covenant to be depending. See 1 Roll 223. Cro. Eliz. 677. 3 Com. Dig. 350. Contra, Cro. Eliz. 740.—Note. In the several editions of Cro. Eliz. the number of the pages from 457 to 472 is repeated. (24) That the conusors are of full age, sound mind, and out of prison. 2 Bl. Com. 351. (25) In what cases a feme covert shall be examined, see Vin. Abr. Fine, (F. M.) and Co. Lit. 353. a. How she shall be examined, and when she shall be barred, though not examined, Chet. 52. When a year and a day have elapsed from the acknowledgment of a fine, an affidavit must be made that all those who depart with any interest by the fine are still living, otherwise the king's silver will not be received. Barnes, 215. *P. 6. 5. The nature, a fine. inrolled by the custos brevium; and upon this roll A fine is a record as of great antiquity (29), so use, and fruit of of a high nature, great force, and much credit and esteem; and it is now become and serves for a formal conveyance of land, and one of the common assurances of the kingdom; for by this means a man may convey his land to another in fee simple, fee tail, for life or years, with reservation of rent also. It is therefore called a feoffment of record; [or the acknowledgment by record of a feoffment;] for it doth countervail [that is, is equivalent to] a feoffment with livery of seisin in (26) Which must be inrolled in the proper office, according to the statute of 5 H. 4. c. 14. (27) By the couusee against the tenant to compel him to attorn; but by the stat. of 4 & 5 Ann, c. 16. § 9. fines are good, without attornment; and there is no occasion for suing out those writs. Wils. 44. (28) Though it is usual to complete the indentures of the fine immediately on its being levied, yet there may be many years between the levying and ingrossing a fine. Plow. 366. Chetw. 13. (29) Fines at the common law were frequent before the accession of Will. the 1st. 2 Inst511. Vin. Abr. Fine, (A. 1, 2.) And are supposed to have been coeval with our courts of record. See Chet. 2. As to the origin and antiquity of fines, see Essay on Fines, ch. 1. the country, and it concludeth all that the feoff- (30) And the stat. of 18 Ed. 1. says, that on these accounts such solemnity is required in passing a fine. 2 Inst. 513. (31) The fine, with proclamations, if the conusee dies before the proclamations are completed, his heir may, if he pleases, cause them to be made. Wakefield v. Hodgson, Cro. Eliz. 692 & 708. 6. What shall be said a good fine, or not: and how the persons there by, or to whom a may be conusors barreth intails peremptorily, whether the heir do claim within five years or not, if he make his claim [present or future, vested or contingent in estate or in title or possibility] by him, [vis. title by or through him] that levied the fine (32). Any person male or female, body sole, or corporate, that hath capacity to grant, or is able to be a 1. In respect of grantor by a deed, may levy a fine and be a conuund their sor therein; but there are certain persons prohibited capacity. And by law, which the judges or commissioners that fine may be le- take the conusance of fines, ought not to admit or vied, and who receive; and yet if they do admit them, and a fine or conusees. And be levied by such persons, the fine is good and by what names. unavoidable, fieri non debet sed factum valet; and of this sort are madmen, lunatics (33), villains, idiots, men that have the lethargy, doting old persons that want discretion, drunken men, and men that are forced to it by threatening, imprisonment, or the like: also such as are born blind, deaf and dumb, but a man that becomes so accidentally may be received and ought not to be refused. Also Persons attaint. persons attainted of felony or treason ought not to be received to levy a fine, but such persons being admitted to levy a fine, the fine will be good against all persons but the king and the lord of whom their lands whereof the fine is levied, are held, for their times (34): but persons waived or outlawed in personal actions only, ought not to be refused (35). And the king, lord, &c. may be benefited by such fine; since the fine may bar an intail, and thus exclude the issue: and though fines *P. 7. Non sana memoria. (32) It is grown at this day to be the most common assurance or conveyance, and is the strength of almost every man's inheritance. Wils. on Fines, 2. (33) This is true strictly at law; but where a man conveyed lands by deeds, fines and recoveries, under value, and by an inquisition was found to be a lunatic, the purchase was set aside, and the purchaser only allowed the money he had actually paid. 2 Vern. 678. (34) See the case of Stevens v. Winning, 1 Wils. Rep. part 2. p. 219; where on a special verdict in C. B. the question was, whether a tenant in tail having committed murder, could afterwards, and before conviction, levy a fine, and bar the next heir in tail. The court inclined to think he could, but allowed a second argument, which the reporter never heard came on.-As to conveyances by felons, and whether attainder in a premunire shall have relation to the time of the offence, or only to the time of the judgment, to cause a forfeiture of lands. See Cro. Car. 172. Grosse v. Gayer, Sir Wm. Jones, 217.-Forfeitures for treason and felony arise only upon attainder, but they have relation to the time of the offence committed, so as to avoid all intermediate sales and incumbrances. 4 Bl. Com. 381 & 386. 7 ed. (35) Fine levied by an outlaw in a personal action before seizure is good, and the conusee shall hold the land against the king; but if seizure be made before the fine is levied, it is otherwise. Windsor v. Saywell, 1 Lev. 33. |