Elimination of Minimum Social Security Benefit Under Public Law 97-35: Hearing Before the Subcommittee on Social Security of the Committee on Ways and Means, House of Representatives, Ninety-seventh Congress, First Session, September 10, 1981U.S. Government Printing Office, 1981 - 57 páginas |
Comentarios de la gente - Escribir un comentario
No encontramos ningún comentario en los lugares habituales.
Otras ediciones - Ver todas
Términos y frases comunes
actual additional affected AHART amount appear apply assets assume average basis believe Budget Chairman PICKLE characteristics coming committee computers Congress considered correct cost covered depended disabled dually entitled earnings economic eligible for SSI eliminating the minimum employee estimates fact Federal Federal pensions figure fiscal follows getting give going GUARINI hearing income increase individuals JACOBS less Medicaid million mini minimum beneficiaries minimum benefit month MYERS OASDI benefits based Office original outlays overlap paid participation paying pensions percent persons present proposals provision question reason receiving recipients record reductions represents result retired RIVLIN rolls ROUSSELOT sample savings SHANNON showed Social Security Administration social security benefits social security system sources spouses SSI payments statement Supplemental taken talking testimony Thank welfare widows windfall workers
Pasajes populares
Página 23 - Resolved, That the chief clerk of the assembly be hereby directed to transmit copies of this resolution to the President and Vice President of the United States...
Página 23 - Resolved, That the secretary of the senate is hereby directed to transmit copies of this resolution to the President and Vice President of the United States, to the Speaker of the House of Representatives, and to each Senator and Representative from California in the Congress of the United States.
Página 23 - California that the subventions be continued at undiminished rates: now, therefore, be it Resolved by the Assembly and the Senate of the State of California, jointly. That the Legislature of the State of California respectfully...
Página 38 - Division of the General Accounting Office. STATEMENT OF GREGORY J. AHART, DIRECTOR, MANPOWER AND WELFARE DIVISION, GENERAL ACCOUNTING OFFICE; ACCOMPANIED BY EDWARD A.
Página 38 - We found that the minimum benefit provision, which was intended to help the poor, has in recent years mainly benefited retired government workers with pensions, and homemakers supported by their spouses
Página 42 - January 1979, but allowed cost-of-living increases for these beneficiaries after they become eligible for social security. Under these amendments, anyone becoming eligible for the minimum benefit would initially start drawing benefits based on the minimum primary insurance amount of $122, but would thereafter receive benefit increases based on the Consumer Price Index, as under the prior law. According to the Social Security Administration, it will take more than 30 years for the freezing action...
Página 42 - Only 6 percent of the minimum beneficiaries had covered earnings of as much as $4,000 during any single year in that time period, and only one-third had covered earnings of as much as $2,000 in any one of those years.
Página 42 - Many persons had not worked in covered employment for several years before receiving social security. Nearly half had not worked in covered employment for 5 years, and about one-third for 10 years. For these people, social security was a new source of income upon becoming eligible...
Página 42 - Also, about 23 percent of our sampled minimum beneficiaries were "dually entitled." That is, they were entitled to social security on either their own or their spouse's account, and their spouse's account provided a higher payment. Under the law, the dually entitled person is paid the higher of the two entitlements. Consequently, the minimum benefit provision does not increase the benefits of the dually entitled person.
Página 34 - ... unfortunately I feel, for example, very unhappy about the fact of how can a Congressman be an expert on the 14,400 pieces of legislation on pay. Mrs. SPELLMAN. We would like to have you come to the hustings with us and tell that to a constituent who wants to know about it. Dr. WOLKOMIR. I do. Mr. CLAY. Mr. Rousselot? Mr. ROUSSELOT. Thank you, Mr. Chairman. Thank you for being here today, Dr. Wolkomir. We do appreciate your input. My understanding is that in your 150,000 membership, you represent...