Imágenes de páginas
[blocks in formation]



190 439





Du Moulin

424 205





Palmer 505

Poole 146 Potter 171 Prideaux 36

Reynolds 369

Rivet 166

Sibbes 290 Smith 267

Taylor, T. 450

Twiffe 403

Usher 350 379 Whately 48 Whitaker, J. 25|Wilkins 459 | Winter


Gouge, W. Gouge, T.

43 160






Hildersham Homel

95 284 397


[merged small][ocr errors]

Tho Frotter

hudlend as the dateres.


From an Original Penere in Lambeth Pulace.

Biographia Evangelica.




MINENT as this Prelate was by his station, he was more so by his parts and learning, and by his

zeal for the Proteftant Religion. He had great influence in the public affairs of his time. We shall leave, however, as much as possible, the detail of his transactions, as a great member of the state, to the civil historian, and confine ourselves, principally, to those circumstances of his life, which mark him as a public Governor in the Church, or represent him in his function as a Man of GOD.

He was born Oktober 29, 1562, at Guildford, in Surry, of very worthy parents; remarkably distinguished by their Iteady steal for the protestant religion ; for their living long and happily together, and for their singular felicity in their children. While his mother was pregnant with this son, she is said to have had a dream which proved at once an omen and an inftruinent of his future fortunes. Her dream was this. She fancied she was told in her fleep, that if the could eat a jack, or pike, the child the went with would prove a son, and rise to great preferment. Not long after this, in taking a pail of water out of the river Wey, which ran by their house, the accidentally caught a jack, and had thus an odd opportunity of fulfilling her dream. This story being much talked of, and coming to the ears of some persons of distinction, they offered to become sponsors for the child, which was kindly accepted ; and they had the goodness to afford many testimonies of their affection to their Godson, while VOL. III,



[ocr errors]

at school, and after he was sent to the university. Such
were the good effects at least of his mother's dream.

When he was grown up to an age proper for receiving
the first tincture of learning, he was sent with his elder
brother Robert to the free-Ichool, erected in their native
town of Guildford, by K. Edward VI. and having
passed through the rudiments of literature, under the
care of Mr. Francis Taylor, who had then the direction
of that school, he was in 1578 removed to the university
of Oxford, and entered a Itudent in Baliol-college. On
November 29, 1583, being then bachelor of arts, he was
elected probationer-fellow of his college ; and afterwards
proceeding in the faculty of arts, he entered into holy
orders, and became a celebrated preacher in the university.
He cominenced bachelor of divinity in 1593, and pro-
ceeded doctor in that faculty in May 1597 : And in the
month of September, of the same year, he was elected
inafter of University-college. About this time it was,
that the first differences began between him and Dr. Laud,
which subsisted as long as they lived, and were the cause of
great uneasiness to both. In the year following, which
was 1598, he published a Latin work which did him great
honor; and which was afterwards reprinted in Germany.

On March 6, 1599, he was installed dean of Winchefier, in the room of Dr. Martin Heton, who was preferred to the bishoprick of Ely: Dr. Abbot being then about thirtyseven years of age. Some writers say that he was also dean of Gloucester, but this is absolutely a mistake. In 1600, he was vice-chancellor of the university of Oxford, and distinguished himself while in that high office, by the opinion he gave with respect to the setting up again the cross in Cheapside, about which there were great disputes; but in the end he carried his point against Dr. Bancroft, then bishop of London, and afterwards archbishop of Canterbury; which gained himn great reputation, as appears by a tract published on that subject. The cross at Cheapfide was taken down in the year 1600, in order to be repaired, and upon this occasion, the citizens of London defired the advice of both universities on this question: Whether the faid cross should be re-erected or not? And Dr. Abbot, as vice-chancellor of Oxford, gave it as his opinion, that the crucifix with the dove upon it Mould not be again set up, but approved rather of a pyramid, or fome other inatter of mere ornament, for the reafons assigned in his letter. In this determination De acted confiftently with his own practice, when in his


[ocr errors][ocr errors]
« AnteriorContinuar »