CASES OVERRULED, DOUBTED AND DENIED. Arques v. Wasson (51 Cal. 620; 21 Am. Rep. 718), denied; Mayer v. Taylor Backes v. Dent (55 Ind. 181), doubted; Dunlap v. Wagner (85 Ind. 529), 45. Bennett v. State (31 Iowa, 24), denied; Compton v. State (18 Tex. Ct. App. Bissell v. Bugbee (7 Reporter, 550), doubted; Meech v. Ensign (49 Conn. 191), 229. Blair v. Bartlett (75 N. Y. 150; 31 Am. Rep. 155), denied ; Goble v. Dillon (86 Blyer v. Monholland (2 Sandf. Ch. 478), doubted; Meech v. Ensign (49 Conn. Brunswick v. Hoover (24 Alb. L. J. 185), denied; Lewis v. McCabe (49 Conn. Buckingham v. Billings (13 Mass. 82), denied; Green v. Raymona (58 Tex. Burr v. Beers (24 N. Y. 178), denied; Meech v. Ensign (49 Conn. 191), 228. Clark v. Port of Mobile (67 Ala. 217), denied; People v. Fire Association of Collins v. Early (54 Ind. 559), doubted; Dunlap v. Wagner (85 Ind. 529), 45. Commonwealth v. House (13 Bush, 680), doubted; Commonwealth v. Overby Comstock v. Scales (7 Wis. 159), denied; Mayer v. Taylor (69 Ala. 403), 523. Coursey v. Davis (46 Penn. St. 25), denied ; Briggs v. McCarty (86 Ind. 352), 330. Crocker v. Marine Nat. Bank (101 Mass. 240; 3 Am. Rep. 336), denied ; Holmes v. Nat. Bank of Wilmington (18 S. C. 31), 562. Crowell v. Currie (27 N. J. Eq. 152), doubted; Meech v. Ensign (49 Conn. Curtis v. Tyler (9 Pai. 432), doubted; Meech v. Ensign (49 Conn. 191), 229. Danforth v. Woodward (10 Pick. 423; 20 Am. Dec. 531), denied; Green v. Davis v. Calloway (30 Ind. 112), denied; Meech v. Ensign (49 Conn. 191), 228. Gates v. Preston (41 N. Y. 113), denied; Goble v. Dillon (86 Ind. 327), 312, 313, Goss v. Eberhart (29 Ga. 545), denied ; Briggs v. McCarty (86 Ind. 352), 331. Hall v. McHenry (19 Iowa, 521), denied; Ward v. Hackett (30 Minn, 150), 189. Harvey v. State (40 Ind. 516), denied; People v. Wheeler (60 Cal. 581), 76, 77. Hoff's Appeal (24 Penn. St. 200), doubted; Meech v. Ensign (49 Conn. 191), Holland v. State (38 Tex. 474), overruled; Wooldridge v. State (13 Tex. Ct. Hutchinson v. Ford (9 Bush, 318; 15 Am. Rep. 711), denied; Mayer v. Taylor Jackson v. Coggins (29 Ga. 403), denied ; Briggs v. McCarty (86 Ind. 352), 331. Kelly v. Southern Minn. R. Co. (28 Minn. 98), denied ; Hudson v. Chicago, etc., King v. Whiteley (10 Pai. 465), doubted; Meech v. Ensign (49 Conn. 191), 229. Looney v. McLean (129 Mass. 33; s. c., 37 Am. Rep. 295), doubted; Purcell Marriott v. Mayor (8 Md. 160), denied; Faulkner v. City of Aurora (85 Ind. Merkle v. State (37 Ala. 139), denied; People v. Wheeler (60 Cal. 581), 80. Morrill v. State (5 Tex. Ct. App. 447), overruled; Compton v. State (13 Tex. Ct People v. Clough (17 Wend. 351), denied; Strong v. State (86 Ind. 208), 295. People v. Hovey (5 Barb. 117), overruled; People v. Faber (92 N. Y. 146), 359. Robinson v. Ezzell (72 N. C. 231), denied; Mayer v. Taylor (69 Ala. 403), 523. Roland v. State (9 Tex. Ct. App. 277), overruled; Compton v. State (13 Tex. Scranton v. Stewart (52 Ind. 68), doubted; Sims v. Bardoner (86 Ind. 87), 270. Schwinger v. Raymond (83 N. Y. 192; 38 Am. Rep. 415), denied; Goble v. Sloan v. People (Iowa), denied ; Compton v. State (13 Tex. Ct. App. 271), 704. Spooner v. Fletcher (3 Vt. 138; 21 Am. Dec 579), denied; Green v. Raymond Stadtfield v. Hunteman (92 Penn. St. 53; 37 Am. Rep. 661), denied; Lewis v. Stoudenmeier v. Williamson (29 Ala. 566), denied; People v. Wheeler (60 Cal. Sumner v. Cottey (71 Mo. 121), denied ; Knittel v. Cushing (57 Tex 354), 601. Thorp v. Keokuk Coal Co. (48 N. Y. 253), denied; Meech v. Ensign (49 Conn. Tilton v. Beecher (New York), denied ; Compton v. State (13 Tex. Ct. App. True v. Telegraph Co. (60 Me. 9; 11 Am. Rep. 156), denied ; Western Union CASES OVERRULED, DOUBTED AND DENIED. xxxiii Urquhart v. Brayton (12 R. I. 169), denied; Meech v. Ensign (49 Conn. 191). 228. Webb v. Holmes (3 B. Monr. 404), denied; Briggs v. McCarty (86 Ind. 352), 325. Western Union Telegraph Co. v. Hopkins (49 Ind. 227), denied; Reliance Lumber Co. v. Western Union Telegraph Co. (58 Tex. 394), 623. Zortlein v. Brown (N. Y. Super.), overruled; Bertles v. Nunan (92 N. Y. 152) 367. VOL. XLIV A traveller on a city street was injured by persons coasting on the street. The coasting was carried on by a large crowd, in presence of the mayor, marshal and police officers. There was an ordinance prohibiting on the streets all sports tending to produce bodily injury. Held, that no action would lie against the city. A CTION for personal injuries. The opinion states the case. The defendant had judgment below. O. F. Roberts, for appellant. C. S. Jelley, for appellee. MORRIS, C. The appellant sued the appellee for an injury sustained by his son, on Main street in the city of Aurora, on the 30th day of November, 1880. It is alleged in the complaint, that from the 1st day of November, 1880, until the 15th day of February, 1881, said Main street, ex VOL. XLIV-1 |