But this effort to decide whether or not a given "area" viewed in the abstract is "constitutionally protected" deflects attention from the problem presented by this case. For the Fourth Amendment protects people, not places. What a person knowingly exposes... FBI Law Enforcement Bulletin - Página 291976Vista completa - Acerca de este libro
| United States. Congress. Senate. Committee on the Judiciary - 1971 - 1206 páginas
...optical and acoustiai devices which are used to improperly intercept private communications, held that "what a person knowingly exposes to the public, even in his own home c office, is not a subject of constitutional protection . . . the protection of i person's general... | |
| United States. Congress. Senate. Banking and Currency Committee - 1972 - 540 páginas
...using an otherwise public telephone booth, said : "The Fourth Amendment protects people, not places. What a person knowingly exposes to the public, even...protection. See. Lewis v. United States, 385 US 206, 210 (1966) ; United States v. Lee, 274 US 559, 563 (1927). But what he seeks to preserve as private, even... | |
| United States. Congress. Senate. Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs - 1972 - 1214 páginas
...using an otherwise public telephone booth, said : "The Fourth Amendment protects people, not places. What a person knowingly exposes to the public, even...not a subject of Fourth Amendment protection. See. 1,1-wi» v. United States, 385 US 206, 210 (1966) ; United State* v. Lee, 274 US 559, 563 (1927). But... | |
| United States. Supreme Court, John Chandler Bancroft Davis, Henry Putzel, Henry C. Lind, Frank D. Wagner - 1972 - 980 páginas
...seizure under all the circumstances. The 6 Moreover, what a person knowingly exposes to the public is not a subject of Fourth Amendment protection. See Lewis v. United States, 385 US 206, 210 (1966); United States v. Lee, 274 US 559, 563 (1927); Hester v. United States, 265 US 57 (1924). Opinion... | |
| United States. Congress. Senate. Interior and Insular Affairs Committe - 1974 - 544 páginas
...invaded..." BERGER V. NEV YORK. 386 US 41 (1967). "For the Fourth Amendment protects people, not places. What a person knowingly exposes to the public, even...is not a subject of Fourth Amendment protection... .But what he seeks to preserve as private, even in an area accessible to the public, may be constitutionally... | |
| United States. Congress. Senate. Banking, Housing and Urban Affairscommittee - 1974 - 228 páginas
...103.45. CALIFORNIA BANKERS ASSN. v. SHULTZ 11 We said in Katz v. United States, 389 US 347, 351352. "What a person knowingly exposes to the public, even...office, is not a subject of Fourth Amendment protection. . . . But what he seeks to preserve as private, even in an area accessible to the public, may be constitutionally... | |
| United States. Supreme Court, John Chandler Bancroft Davis, Henry Putzel, Henry C. Lind, Frank D. Wagner - 1974 - 1040 páginas
...argument. In Katz v. United States, supra, we said that the Fourth Amendment provides no protection for what "a person knowingly exposes to the public, even in his own home or office . . . ." 389 US, at 351. The physical characteristics of a person's voice, its tone and manner, as... | |
| |