Entered, according to act of Congress, in the year eighteen hundred and ninety-four, BY THE ALBANY LAW JOURNAL COMPANY TABLE OF CASES REPORTED, NOTED, ABSTRACTED AND DIGESTED. Co.... w.. Co.. Page. Page. Ainsworth v. U. S. 31 Keith v. State.. 231 Alpaugb v. Wilson.. 290 Kelly v. Williams 295 American Accident Co. v. Reigart.. 244 Ketcham v. Newman 226 Averill v. Sawyer... 199 Kilgus v. Trustees 24 Knott v. Tidyman 56 Baker v. Baker et al. 376 | Kohn v. Colliston 119 Baumann v. Moseley. 132 Kraut v. Frankford & Southwark Phila. City Pas. Ry. Bell v. State. 278 425 Benson v. Daly 119 Berthold v. Seevers Man. Co.. 31 Lane v. Holmes.. 199 Birmingham Loan & Auction Co. v. First Nat. Bank of Lang v. Houston, W. S. & P. F. R. Co. 376 Anniston 135 Lawton et al. v. Steele. - 301 Blair v. Adams. 376 Lee v. State 278 Brown v. U. S. 156 Lewy v. Crawford. 8 Brown v. U. S. 119 Little v. Banks.. 332 Buyck v. Schwing.. 295 Louisville & R. Co. v. Stewart 199 Lovee v. Abper. 119 Cameron v. Mount 182 Lowe v. Woods.... 327 Clements v. McGinn.. 150 Clow v. Pittsburgh Traction Co. 135 Malsky v. Schumacker... 295 Collins v. United States... 52 Mansfield Insurance Com. v. Mutual Benefit Life Ins. Commonwealth v. Douglass. 321 Co 356 Commonwealth v. Gilbert, 119 Matter of Badger 242 Consolidated Ice-Machine Co. v. Trenton Hygeian Ice Matter of Cancellation from Registry List. 146 119 Matter of Clarissa E. Curtis 286 Cote v. Murphy. 128 Matter of Holt's Will... 231 Craft Refrigerator Co. v. Quindipial Brewing Co... 855 Matter of Howell Thomas 271 Crandall v. Allen.. 199 Matter of Lum Sin Yung. 410 Cunningham v. Eutrekill.. 288 Matter of Looram.. 135 Matter of Racy 252 Dakin v. Dakin 15 Matter of Tax of Ella S. Hoffman, deceased 319 Dammert v. Osborne. 182 McDaniel v. State.. 135 De Ham v. Mexican N. R. Co. 166. McHugh v. Schlosser 827 Driessen v. State 182 McLane v. Elder.. 119 Monahan v. State. 15 Eldridge v. Heaton 135 | Morgan v. Daniels 363 Exchange Nat. B’k of Spokane v. Bank of Little Rock. 126 Murray v. Gast Lith, and Eng. Co.. 287 Murray v. Peterson 199 Farmer v. State.. 410 Murray v. Peterson 150 Farrell v. School Dist., etc. 167 First Nat. B'k of Cobleskill v. Emmet. 263 Netherland-American Steam Co. v. Hollander. 410 Foss v. Cummings 327 New York & New England R. Co. v. Town of Bristol... 171 N. N. & M. V. Co. v. Eifort.. 289 Gabert v. Olcott.. 135 Northwestern Trav, Men's Assn. v, Schauss. 231 Geraghty v. New 295 Norwalk Gas Co. v. Borough of Norwalk. 355 German Sav. B’k of Baltimore v. Renshaw.. 295 Gibson v. Minneapolis, St. P. & S. S. Ry, Co. 31 Odone v. New England Mortgage Security Co. 182 Grant v. City of Fitchburg 13 Osborne & Co. v. Francis. 231 Grant v. Grant 855 Osburn v. Throckmorton. 135 Greenfield y. Getman 268 | Oyster & Fish Co. v. Bank 440 Greenwood et al. v. Town of Westport. 355 Gump v. Sibley.. 263 Palmer v. Banfield.. 182 Palmer v. State.. 376 Hague v. Wheeler.. 31 Parker v. State 327 Hallack v. Loft 166 | Payne v. Payne. 410 Halle's Curator v. Texas & P. Ry. Co. 376 People v. Attridge.. 193 Hammond, Geo. H., Co. v. Johnson 199 People, ex rel. Edison Gen. Electric Co., v. Barker, et al. 163 Hannig v. Hannig.. 327 | People, ex rel. Second Ave. R. R. Co., v. Barker et al. 162 Harper v. State.. 327 People v. Berlin.. 327 Hayward v. Lopes.. 182 People v. Crews. 410 Hayward Homestead Tract Ass'p y. Miller. 135 People, ex rel. Keene, v. Board of Supervisors of Hill v. Rich Hill Coal Min. Co.... 231 Queens County 851 Holmes v. First Nat. Bank of Lincoln. 182 People v. Curtis.. 13 People v. De Foor.. 166 Irving v. Britton..... 323 People v. Ewer 305 People v. Gardineer. 15 Jaeger v. Bowery Bank of New York.. 375 People v. Gordou.. 150 Johnson v. Chesapeake & 0. Ry. Co.. 231 People v. Gardner 135 Johnson v. Johnson. 135 People v. Hill.. 135 Johpson v. Watson.. 182 People v. Morphy. 166 Johoson St. Steel Rail Co. v. Wm. Wharton, Jr., et al., 223 | People v. Petrea. 56 People v. Pierce.... Page. Page. 52 Taylor v. McGrath... 376 150 Territory v. Cook. 150 135 Thompson v. Stanley 166 5 Threlkel v. Scott... 135 317 Tillinghast v. Boston & Pt. Royal Lumber Co. 231 376 Tillinghast v. B. & P. R. Lumber Co.. 150 Towle v. Wadsworth..... 166 31 295 United States v. Swan 31 11 United States v. James et al. 401 167 United States, ex rel. International Contracting Co., v. 132 Lamont 256 Upper Potonnac Steamboat Co. v. Blake et al., 263 354 Utzman v. State 199 410 30 Vanderpoel v. Gorman. 158 336 Van Winkle y, Satterfield. 376 10 Voss v. King 278 405 335 Watson v. Watson... 293 Webb v. Hawkins Lumber Co. 376 410 Weitzner v. Thingstad, 119 119 Wendt v. Chicago, St. P., M. & 0. Ry. Co.. 263 148 Western Union Telegraph Co. v. Hutchinson 278 119 Western Union Telegraph Co. v. Smith. 15 376 Wiedenfield v. Gallagher. 199 26 Williams v. State 166 295 Wilson v. King. 410 55 Wise et al. v. Grant. 284 119 Wolert v. Arledge. 77 55 Wolf v, Buttner 182 270 | Wupsch v. Weber 176 327 THE ALBANY LAW JOURNAL: A WEEKLY RECORD OF THE LAW AND THE LAWYERS. The Albany Law Journal. These papers will be followed by a general discussion of the Judiciary Article, and also by a consideration of the work of the Constitutional ALBANY, JANUARY 6, 1894. Convention. The committee of arrangements has provided Current Lopics. generously for the social side of the meeting. Governer Flower has invited the members of Tis announced that Senator Dolph will address the association to attend his annual reception the Bar Association on the 16th inst. upon the to the members of the Legislature, to be held on subject of law reform. The Senator is better the evening of the 16th. known as a lawyer at the West perhaps than in The association will entertain its members this State, but aside from his well-earned repu- and guests at the Fort Orange Club at luncheon tation as a senator, he is well known to the pro- on the 17th, at the recess between the morning fession in the State of New York as a lawyer. and afternoon meetings, and in the evening a What he has to say upon this interesting sub- reception will be tendered by the association ject will be well worth hearing and considering to the judges of the Court of Appeals and The address of President J. Newton Fiero justices of the Supreme Court of the State. will be upon a kindred topic, “ Law Reform in These social functions will enable the memthe State of New York.” Mr. Fiero has devoted bers of the bar to meet each other and make much time and attention to the study and dis- new acquaintances and renew old ones as well cussion of this subject, and has been active in as to meet the chief executive and members of the association before and since becoming its the judiciary of the State. president, in promoting law reform in the State in its different phases. He touched upon the The presence of Vice-President Adlai E. subject in his address last year, but the subject Stevenson as one of the speakers at the meetis doubly interesting at this time, in view of the ing of the association on the evening of the coming Constitutional Convention. His criti- 16th at the Assembly Chamber, will give added , cism of the Code of Procedure as it now exists, interest to this gathering. Aside from his reas made at that time, created much interest and lation to the Federal government, the vicewas well received by the bar. president has, before as well as since he has Among others who will read papers or deliver held his present position, obtained a well deaddresses relative to the Judiciary Article of the served reputation for ability and capacity as a Constitution with reference to the coming con- presiding officer, not only, but as a man of varied vention are Walter S. Logan, of New York city; accomplishments, great versatility and possessHon. William H. Robertson, of Westchester; ing the power of concisely and clearly expressHon. Augustus Schoonmaker, of the third dis-ing his views upon all subjects. trict; Louis Marshall, John B. Stanchfield, Martin W. Cooke and Norris Morey, representing The question whether an attorney or solicitor the other districts of the State. can be lawfully stricken from the roll for any VOL. 49 – No. 1, |
0 Opiniones Las opiniones no están verificadas, pero Google revisa que no haya contenido falso y lo quita si lo identifica Escribir un comentario |