...courts. See ante, at 264-265, n. 8; post, at 285, n. 10. 4 Indeed, as Justice Jackson once noted, "O]e are not final because we are infallible, but we are infallible only because we are final." Brown v. Allen, 344 US 443, 540 (concurring in result). 8 The possibility that a lower court may have...

...would simply state, "Chaos serves no social end." 5 Or, speaking of the Court, he would dryly remark, "We are not final because we are infallible, but we are infallible only because we are final." * Or he would tersely state, "Environment illuminates the meaning of acts, as context does that of...

...4П-П.ЧЯ n — 7П observed, "are always open." 14T With refreshing candor, Justice Jackson commented: "We are not final because we are infallible, but we are infallible only because we are final." "8 As criticism mounts in Court, Congress and country, with the appointment of new Supreme Court Justices,...

...of my favorite quotation, where Mr. Justice Jackson warned his colleagues, "You must remember, that we are not final because we are infallible, but we are infallible because we are final." That is one difference between the Congress and courts in our system. Finally....

...Brown v. Atten, 344 US 443 (1953), observed with respect to purely legal issues decided by this Court: "However, reversal by a higher court is not proof...but we are infallible only because we are final." Id., at 540. The same is surely true of a judge's review of the factual determinations of a magistrate;...

...States Supreme Court would be reduced does not mean that justice will be denied. Justice Jackson stated: [R]eversal by a higher court is not proof that justice...infallible, but we are infallible only because we are final.*1 In civil cases, although there are not the same number of frivolous appeals, the facts and...

...Court would be reduced does not mean that justice will be denied. Justice Jackson stated: [RJeversal by a higher court is not proof that justice is thereby...infallible, but we are infallible only because we are final.*1 In civil cases, although there are not the same number of frivolous appeals, the facts and...

...a leading constitutional scholar, concludes: As Justice Robert Jackson once observed of the Court, "We are not final because we are infallible, but we are infallible only because we are final." And the Courts that held slaves to be nonpersons, separate to be equal, and pregnancy to be non sex-related...

...judges decide. It is not true, as Justice Jackson once remarked, that Justices of the Supreme Court "are not final because we are infallible, but we are infallible only because we are final." 300 The Court is neither final nor infallible. Judicial decisions rest undisturbed only to the extent...

...judges decide. It is not true, as Justice Jackson once remarked, that Justices of the Supreme Court "are not final because we are infallible, but we are infallible only because we are final."300 The Court is neither final nor infallible. Judicial decisions rest undisturbed only to the...