Safe, Legal, and Unavailable? Abortion Politics in the United StatesSAGE Publications, 2007 - 235 páginas The Supreme Court’s 1973 decision in Roe v. Wade legalized abortion. Yet while the medical procedure is legal—and safe—many women across the country do not have the ability to exercise this reproductive right. Melody Rose examines abortion as a social regulatory policy, thoughtfully and thoroughly chronicling the erosion of abortion rights and availability since Roe. Paying respect to all views of this controversial topic in her engaging new book, Rose explores the success of the right-to-life movement in accumulating local and national policies that restrict access to abortion while enhancing fetal protections. In addition to a basic and brief primer on the practice and history of abortion, Rose considers the roles played by the courts, political parties, and interest groups in constructing barriers to abortion. With an examination of public opinion poll data and a look at both state and national statutory prohibitions on abortion, Rose also shows how powerful language wars have resulted in material policy alterations. Chapter-opening vignettes and vivid storytelling make this brief and topical supplement a good read that is sure to get your students thinking critically about this highly charged topic. As well, the author has augmented chapters with further reading suggestions and provocative discussion questions that invite insightful discussion and analysis. |
Dentro del libro
Resultados 1-3 de 26
... platform . National party organizations develop and refine a major party platform with each presidential election . Platforms attract electoral groups to the party , and studies indicate that party members in government do in fact ...
... platform marked a new energy within the pro - choice community . Responding to Webster v . Reproductive Health Services ( 1989 ) and boasting a pro - choice candidate in Bill Clinton , the Democrats included sup- port for a national law ...
... platform . By 1988 , however , when the House considered a bill to let the Hyde restrictions stand , there is an even clearer example of Democratic disunity . In their 1984 and 1988 platforms , the Democrats had announced their desire ...
Contenido
Just the Facts | 30 |
Conclusion | 50 |
Abortion on Demand? The Supreme Court | 57 |
Derechos de autor | |
Otras 8 secciones no mostradas