Safe, Legal, and Unavailable? Abortion Politics in the United StatesSAGE Publications, 2007 - 235 páginas The Supreme Court’s 1973 decision in Roe v. Wade legalized abortion. Yet while the medical procedure is legal—and safe—many women across the country do not have the ability to exercise this reproductive right. Melody Rose examines abortion as a social regulatory policy, thoughtfully and thoroughly chronicling the erosion of abortion rights and availability since Roe. Paying respect to all views of this controversial topic in her engaging new book, Rose explores the success of the right-to-life movement in accumulating local and national policies that restrict access to abortion while enhancing fetal protections. In addition to a basic and brief primer on the practice and history of abortion, Rose considers the roles played by the courts, political parties, and interest groups in constructing barriers to abortion. With an examination of public opinion poll data and a look at both state and national statutory prohibitions on abortion, Rose also shows how powerful language wars have resulted in material policy alterations. Chapter-opening vignettes and vivid storytelling make this brief and topical supplement a good read that is sure to get your students thinking critically about this highly charged topic. As well, the author has augmented chapters with further reading suggestions and provocative discussion questions that invite insightful discussion and analysis. |
Dentro del libro
Resultados 1-3 de 35
... choose to abort . The public discourse sometimes portrays such a choice as flip- pant or callous . Yet women ... choosing to have an abortion . The surveyed women cited a variety of motivations for ending their pregnancies . Seventy ...
... chooses . With this we do not agree . » 17 The right to choose an abortion in consultation with one's doctor does not necessarily mean an abortion will take place . Physicians may decline because they personally disagree with the ...
... choose to have an abortion under Roe , government could choose not to fund it under Maher and Harris . The Court explains this logic in its verdict for Harris : But , regardless of whether the freedom of a woman to choose to terminate ...
Contenido
Just the Facts | 30 |
Conclusion | 50 |
Abortion on Demand? The Supreme Court | 57 |
Derechos de autor | |
Otras 8 secciones no mostradas