Safe, Legal, and Unavailable? Abortion Politics in the United States
SAGE Publications, 2007 - 235 páginas
The Supreme Court’s 1973 decision in Roe v. Wade legalized abortion. Yet while the medical procedure is legal—and safe—many women across the country do not have the ability to exercise this reproductive right. Melody Rose examines abortion as a social regulatory policy, thoughtfully and thoroughly chronicling the erosion of abortion rights and availability since Roe. Paying respect to all views of this controversial topic in her engaging new book, Rose explores the success of the right-to-life movement in accumulating local and national policies that restrict access to abortion while enhancing fetal protections. In addition to a basic and brief primer on the practice and history of abortion, Rose considers the roles played by the courts, political parties, and interest groups in constructing barriers to abortion. With an examination of public opinion poll data and a look at both state and national statutory prohibitions on abortion, Rose also shows how powerful language wars have resulted in material policy alterations. Chapter-opening vignettes and vivid storytelling make this brief and topical supplement a good read that is sure to get your students thinking critically about this highly charged topic. As well, the author has augmented chapters with further reading suggestions and provocative discussion questions that invite insightful discussion and analysis.
Resultados 1-3 de 28
First , under the Webster ruling , the state is allowed to impose mandatory viability
testing on women whose pregnancies are possibly within the viability range .
Earlier cases recognized the difficulty of determining viability both because ...
The House version of the Labor , Health and Human Services ( Labor / HHS )
appropriations bill for that year eliminated the rape and incest exceptions ,
allowed medical schools to get federal funding without requiring doctors to
The Court - allowed the declaration of when life begins to go into effect because
five justices agreed that there was insufficient evidence that it would be used to
restrict such protected activities as choices of contraception or abortion ; should ...
Comentarios de la gente - Escribir un comentario
Just the Facts
Abortion on Demand? The Supreme Court
Derechos de autor
Otras 8 secciones no mostradas