Assessments. Statute construed: Subscribers.- Subscription: Mutual promise: Contracts: Consideration.-Corporators.- Payment of five per cent.: Credit: Implication-Declaration : Recital: Demurrer.-Commissioners on subscriptions: Assign- 130 506 213 269 197 PEOPLE 0. MARION. Informations: Uttering a forged instrument: Specifying the forgery.- Variance.-Allegation of specific forgery. 255 PERKINS 0. KEATING. Appeals in chancery: Final order. PURKISS 7. BENSON. Description: Boundaries: Evidence: Res gesta: Conversation.-Statements.- Construction of deed.-Public Plat.-Charge to the jury.-Highway: Certiorari: Motion to dismiss: Practice.-Discre- tion.-Double application.—Custody of children: Interested par- Record entry: Statutes.-Inferences: Evidence: Presumptions.- PAGE. STEWART . BAILEY. Guardian sales: Sale bond: Probate pro ceedings: Ejectment: Bona fide purchaser. 251 ST. GEORGE'S SOCIETY OF DETROIT, Burton v. 261 ST. JOSEPH Co. VILLAGE FIRE INS. Co., VAN BUREN v. 898 Subse 503 289 506 427 SWIFT v. BARBER. Promissory notes: Interest: Alteration.-Rate of interest: Authority to make alteration.-Assent. TAFT, MARQUETTE & ONTONAGON R. R. Co. v. THARP, PENINSULAR RAILWay Co. v. UNDERWOOD, HARWOOD v. VAN BUREN v. ST. JOSEPH Co. VILLAGE INS. Co. Insurance: Policy: Application: By-laws: Mortgaged property: Value.Mortgagee: Mortgagor's interest: Contract.-Owner.-Insurance companies: Agents: Notice.-Presumptions: Applicant.Extent of incumbrances: Notice to agent: Waiver.-Extent of mortgages.-Warranty.-Amount of mortgages: Materiality to the risk. Waldron v. HarrING. Promissory notes : Guaranty of collection: Possession.-Resulting trusts.-Intention: Payment.—Presumptions: Donation: Advancement.-Evidence. 898 493 111 77 WEISS v. WHITTEMORE. Libel: Declaration: Matter of inducement: Innuendo: Certainty.-Damages: Agency: Salary.Loss of trade.-Loss of profits: Allegation of damages-Publication: Newspaper: Malice: Actionable per se.—Slander. WEST . LARAWAY. Married women: Personal liability: Separate property: Statute construed: Contracts: Surety for husband.-Intent: Consideration.-Agreement: Wife's promise.Evidence: Agreement to abstain from prosecuting.-Promissory notes: Liability of married women.- Equitable doctrine of charges on wife's separate property: Action at law under the 366 464 264 866 164 WILLARD, LOVELL v. WILLETS D. MANDLEBAUM. Title: Possession: Intendments: Laches.-Ejectment: Remedy in equity.-Ancient probate proceedings: Presumptions.-Territorial law construed: Register of probate: Partition.-Recital: Deed: Order: Evidence.Jurisdiction.-Partition proceedings: Parties.-Remedy: Ap peal. PAGE. 346 521 OCTOBER TERM, 1873. Michael Harrison v. Joseph Sager. Practice: Costs. This court, having reversed the judgment of the circuit court on an appeal from a justice's court, on the ground that the circuit never acquired jurisdiction, for the reason that the judgment of the justice was void and therefore not appealable, refused costs of the circuit to the plaintiff in error, in whose favor the defective judgment of the justice was rendered. Heard and decided October 7. Error to Kalamazoo Circuit. Motion for costs of the circuit. Sager sued Harrison in justice's court. The cause was tried and submitted, and the justice took five days to consider and then rendered judgment for defendant. Sager appealed to the circuit, where defendant moved to dismiss the appeal for the reason that the justice had lost jurisdiction before he rendered judgment, and that therefore the circuit did not obtain jurisdiction through the appeal. This motion was denied, and the parties proceeded to trial on the merits, which resulted in a verdict and judgment for the plaintiff. The defendant thereupon brought the case to this court on error, alleging as error, among other things, the denial of his motion to dismiss. This court, holding this error well assigned, reversed the judgment of the circuit on that ground (see 27 Mich., 476), with costs of the supreme court, but not ordering a new trial. O. T. Tuthill, for plaintiff in error, moves for an amendment of the judgment of this court so as to give him costs of the circuit. Edwards & Sherwood, contra. |