Title of Case.
In re estate of McCarter.
In re estate of Zahrt...
In re Hahn....
In re Hine v. Woolworth.
In re Jacobs...
In re Larson.
In re Levy...
In re Mang.
In re petition of Allen..
In re petition of Deering et al.
In re petition of Hearn...
In re petition of Hoyt et al.
In re petition of Hughes..
In re petition of Mehrbach.
In re petition of Riley.
In re petition of the U. S.
In re petition of Underbill..
In re probate will of Clark.
In re probate will of Cottrell.
In re probate will of Gourand...
In re probate will of Higgins.
In re probate will of O'Hara..
In re probate will of Smith
In re The Commonwealth Ins. Co...
In re The People v. The National Trust Co
In re The Union Ferry Co..
In re village of Elba..
In re will of Chase...
In re will of Chauncey
In re Wood et al..
Inyo Consolidated Mining Co. v. Pheby.
Isaacson v. The N. Y. C. & H. R. RR. Co...

Reported in Ful.
.94 N. Y., 558..
.94 N. Y., 605
.93 N. Y., 381.
..93 N. Y., 75..
..33 Hun, 374. .

96 N. Y., 381.
10 Daly, 391..
.18 J. & S., 96.
.96 N. Y., 327
.93 N. Y., 361.
.96 N. Y., 378..
.31 Hun, 176..
.93 N. Y., 512.
.33 Hun, 136..
.31 lun, 612..

96 N. Y., 227.
.32 Hun, 449..
.31 Hun, 198.
95 N. Y., 329.
.95 N. Y., 256.
.94 N. Y., 554.
95 N. Y., 403.
95 N. Y., 516.
.32 Hun, 78...

4 Civ. Pro., 203.
.32 Hun, 82.
..30 Hun, 548..
..32 Hun, 318..
.32 Hun, 429.
.33 Hun, 4..
.17 J. & S., 392.
.94 N Y., 278.

W. Dig. .XVIII., 433 .XVIII., 479 .XVII., 449 .XVII, 199 .XIX., 533 .XIX., 364 .XIV., 360 .XIX, 352 .XIX., 274 .XVII., 485

.XIX, 365 XVIII., 360 .XVIII., ..XIX., 465 .XVIII., 515

XIX., 329 .XIX., 282 XVIII., 552

XIX.,
XIII., 516
XVIII., 293

XIX., 87
XIX., 220

XIX., 57
.XVIII., 207

.XIX, 101
.XVIII., 305

.XIX., 409
.XIX., 457

XIX., 344
XVIII., 354
.XVIII., 282

J

Jackson v. Kasscall
Jackson v. The St. Paul F. & M. Ins. Co.
Jermain v. The L. S. & M. S. RR. Co....
Johnson v. Brooks..
Johnson v. Frew....
Johnson v. Lawrence et al..
Johnson et al. v. Meeker et al.
Jones v. Zoller et al..
Joyce v. Cooper.

...30 Hun, 231......

.33 Hun, 60...
..31 Hun, 558.
.93 N. Y., 337.
.33 Hun, 193..
95 N. Y., 154
96 N. Y., 93..
32 Hun., 280.
.17 J. & S., 115.

.XVIII., 52

.XIX., 485 .XVIII., 403 .XVIII., 61

..XIX., 395
XVIII., 517

XIX., 158
.XIX., 287
.XVI., 59

K

Kedian et al. v. Hoyt....
Kelin v. The State..
Kelly v. Burroughs.
Kellum v. McKoon.
Kelly v. McMahon
Kennedy v. The Manhattan R. Co..
Kennedy v. The N. Y. Life Ins. & Trust Co...
Kenny v. Apgar et al
Kenyon v. See et al.
Keogh et al. v. Main et al.
Kerr v. Bryan et al. ....
Kibbe v. Wetmore..
Kilmer v. The N. Y. C. & H. R. RR. Co.
King v. Mackellar.
King v. The Trustees of St. Patrick's Cathedral.
Kingman v. Frank.
Kip v. McLean.
Knapp v. Fowler...
Knapp v. McGowan et al.
Knapp v. Roche.
Knapp v. Simon..

.33 Hun, 145..
.93 N. Y., 291.
.33 Hun, 349..
.31 Hun, 519.
.32 Hun, 347.
.33 Hun, 457..
.32 Hun, 35.
.93 N. Y., 539...
.94 N. Y., 563.
.18 J. & S., 183.
.32 Hun, 51.
.31 Hun, 424..
.94 N. Y., 495.
.94 N. Y., 317.
.18 J. & S., 406
.33 Hun, 471..

2 McCarty, 166
..30 Hun, 512..
..96 N. Y., 75.

.94 N. Y., 329. ...96 N. Y., 284.

.XIX., 406 .XVII., 421

XIX., 478 XVIII., 443 ...XIX., 223

.XIX., 549 XVIII., 568 .XVIII., 73 .XVIII., 422

.XIX, 338
XVIII., 569
.XVIII, 475
.XVIII., 285
.XVIII., 396

.XIX., 501
XIX., 554

.XV., 168
XVIII., 230

.XIX., 182 XVIII., 324

XIX., 250

Title of Case.
Knight v. The N. Y., L. E. & W. RR. Co..
Knowles v. Toone..
Knowles v. Toone.
Kohn v. Koehler....
Krumm v. Beach et al.

Reported in Full.
.30 Hun, 415.
10 Daly 388.
..96 N. Y., 534
.96 N. Y., 362.
.96 N. Y., 398

W. Dig. XVIII., 214

.XIV., 432 XIX., 522 XIX., 363 .XIX., 541

L

Lane v. Lane.....
Langdon v. The Mayor, &c., of N. Y.
Lawrence v. Cooke..
Lawson v. Hogan..
Lawson v. Jones et al., ex'rs.
Laytin et al. v. Davidson et al.
Leach v. Flack et al.
Leavitt v. Wolcott..
Leighton v. The People.
Leonard v. Mulry..
Lesser v. Wunder..
Levison v. Stix et al
Lewis v. Stevens.
Lewis y. The State..
Lichtenburg v. Heardtfelder et al.
Lippman v. Shapiro......
Livingston et al v. Sage et al.
Lockman v. Reilley...
Lockwood v. Fox et al.
Longprey et al. v. Yates.
Lott v. Þegraw..
Loveridge v. Hill et al.
Lowrey et al v. •Clinton et al.
Luce v. Alexander et al...
Lyon et al. v. Hersey et al.

.95 N. Y., 494...
.93 N. Y., 129.
32 Hun, 126.
.93 N. Y., 39..

1 McCarty 247.
.95 N. Y., 263..
.31 Hun, 605...
.95 N. Y., 212..
10 Abb. N. C., 261.
.93 N. Y.,

392...
9 Daly, 70.
.10 Daly, 229.

93 N. Y., 57.
..96 N. Y., 71.
33 Hun, 57
.18 J. & S., 367.
.95 N. Y., 289.
95 N. Y., 64.
.61 How., 522.
.31 Hun, 432
.30 Hun, 417.
.96 N. Y., 222.
.32 Hun, 267.

17 J. & S., 202.
.32 Hun, 253..

XIX., 81 .XVIII., 37

.XIX., 257 .XVII., 148 ...XII., 551 .XVIII., 564 .XVIII., 500 XVIII., 444

.XII., 467 XVII., 450

.IX., 56 XII., 348 XVII., 69 .XIX., 114

XIX., 334 ..XIX., 504 .XVIII., 562 .XVIII., 548 ...XII., 429 .XVIII., 355 XVIII., 235 .XIX., 175 .XIX., 191 .XIX., 100 .XVII., 528

M

Mabie v. Bailey

.95 N. Y., 206.. McCabe v. Jones.

.10 Daly, 222. McCarthy v. The Mayor, &c., of N. Y.

.96 N. Y., 1. Macdonald v. The Mayor, &c., of N. Y.

...32 Hun, 89.. Mack v. Austin...

.95 N. Y., 513. McKenna v. Edmundstone et al.

.10 Daly, 410. McKeon et al. v. Fish.

.33 Hun, 28. McNulty v. Solly...

.66 How., 147 McNulty v. Solly.

.95 N. Y.,

242. Mahon v. Mahon.

18 J. & S., 92. Mallory v. Reichert

32 Hun, 86.. Manley v. Taylor..

18 J. & S., 26. Mapes v. The Am. Home Miss. Soc.

.33 Hun, 360.. Marsh v. The Village of Lansingburgh.

.31 Hun, 514.. Marvin v. Brooks....

.94 N. Y., 71. Marvin v. Prentice..

.94 N. Y., 295. Masterson v. Cranitch..

.66 How., 171. Materne et al. v. Horwitz et al.

.18 J. & S., 41. Mayer et al y. Ehrlich et al

.33 Hun, 1.. Mayor, &c., of N. Y. v. Eisler..

.10 Daly. 396. Mayor, &c., of N. Y. v. Hart et al.

.95 N. Y., 443. Mayor, &c., of N. Y. v. The Second Ave. RR. Co.....31 Hun, 241.. Mead v. Jenkins et al.

95 N. Y., 31. Mead v. Riley.....

.18 J. & S., 20. Meliesy v. Kahn et al.

.18 J. & S., 209. Merritt v. Reid....

.10 Daly, 311.. Metropolitan Concert Garden Co. v. Abbey et al. .17 J. & S., 294. Miller v. Mackenzie et al.

.95 N. Y. 575. Miller v. Miller et al.

.32 Hun, 481. Moore v. Gadsden....

.93 N. Y., 12. Morgan v. The City of Binghamton et al.

.32 Hun, 602. Morrill y. The C. T. Cigar Mfg. Co.....

1.32 Hun. 543.

.XVIII., 507

XII., 339 XIX., 134 XVIII., 535

XIX., 6 .XIV., 494 .XIX., 402 XVII., 568 XVIII., 448 XIX., 346 XIX., 19 .XIX., 336 .XIX., 493 .XVIII., 386 XVIII., 199 .XVIII., 338 .XVIII., 41 XVIII., 522

XIX., 376 . XIV., 362 .XIX., 283 XVIII., 203 .XVIII., 364

.XIX., 340 .XIX., 339 .XIII., 453 .XVII., 351

XIX., 109 .XIX., 145 XVII., 118 .XIX., 228 .XIX., 233

Title of Case.
Morris et al. v. Talcott...
Mulcahy v. The Emigrants’ Savings Bk..
Muller v. The City of Newburgh.
Murphy v. Orr et al..
Murphy v. The N. Y. C. & H. R. RR. Co.,
Murphy v. The People..
Murphy v. Voorhis...
Murray et al. v. Marshall.
Murray v. The N. Y. Life Ins. Co...
Murray v. The N. Y. Life Ins Co..
Myers v. Beeker...

Reported in Full.
..96 N. Y., 100....
..62 How., 463.
.32 Hun, 24..
.96 N. Y., 14.
.31 Hun, 358.

1 N. Y., Crim., 102.
.10 Daly, 457..
.94 N. Y., 611.
.30 Hun, 428..

96 N. Y., 614..
.95 N. Y., 486.

W. Dig. .XIX., 159

XII., 34 .XIX., 550

XIX., 110 XVIII., 434

XVI., 132
.XIV., 230
XVIII., 550
.XVIII., 252

.XIX., 567
.XIX., 39

N

Nason v. Ludington...

....13 Abb. N. C., 401. Nassau Bk. v. Jones et al.

.95 N. Y., 115. Naylor v. Lane..

.18 J. & S., 97. Near v. The D. & H. C. Co.

.32 Hun, 557. Nebenzahl v. Townsend et al.

.10 Daly 232. Nemetty v. Naylor et al.

.63 How., 387. New v. McKechnie et al..

..95 N. Y., 632.. Newcomb v. Almy..

.96 N. Y., 308.. Newman v. The Third Ave. RR. Co..

.18 J. & S., 412 Newburg v. Schwab....

.17 J. & S., 232. Newburger v. The Manneck Mfg. Co.

.10 Daly, 275. Newhall v. Appleton et al...

.17 J. & S., 238.. N. Y. Infant Asylum v. Suprs. of Westchester Co... .31 Hun, 116. Nichols y. Drew et al.

.94 N. Y., 22. Nichols v. Mase....

.94 N. Y., 160. Nixon et al. v. Stanley.

.33 Hun, 247.

.......VII., 552

XVIII., 567

.XIX., 50 .XIX., 303 .XII., 511 XV., 258 XIX., 132 .XIX., 260 .XIX., 500 XVII., 385 XIII., 277 .XVII., 527 XVIII., 274 .XVIII., 109 .XVIII., 277

.XIX., 451

o

O'Brien v. Young et al
O'Dea v. O'Dea..
O'Donohue et al. v. Simmons.
O'Hara et al. v. Dudley et al.
O'Leary v. The Board of Education..
Olsen v. Clyde..
Oppenheimer v. O'Reilly et al.
Oysterbank v. Gardner et al

.95 N. Y., 428.
.31 Hun, 442,
31 Hun, 267.

95 N. Y., 403.
.93 N. Y., 1..
.32 Hun, 425.

10 Daly, 239. .17 J. & S., 263.

.XIX., 86 XVIII, 377 .XVIII., 336

XIX., 87 XVII., 174 .XIX., 430

.XIII., 61 XVIII., 233

Р

Page v. Gilbert et al...
Palmer v. Dearing.
Parker v. Conner et al.
Parker v. Speer...
Parker v. Siroud et al.
Patrick v. Shaffer.
Paulding v. The Chromo Steel Co. et al.
Paulitsch v. The N, Y, C. & H. R. RR. Co..
Pease v. Barnett...
Peck v. Callaghan.
Peck v. Valentine.
People v. Baker..
People v. Bork.
People v. Casey.
People v. Conroy
People v. Courtney.
People v. Courtney..
People v. D'Argencour.
People v. D'Argencour
People v. Dempsey et al.
People v. Gibbs..
People v. Gunn et al.
People v. Hale..
People v. Hougbkirk.

.32 Hun, 301....
.93 N. Y., 7.
..93 N. Y., 118.
.17 J. & S.,..
.31 Hun, 578.
.94 N. Y., 423.
.94 N. Y., 334.
18 J. & S. 241.
.30 Hun, 525..
.95 N. Y., 73.
..94 N. Y., 569.
96 N. Y., 340.
.96 N. Y., 188.
..96 N. Y., 115.

..33 Hun, 119.
...31 Hun, 199.

.94 N. Y., 490..
.32 Hun, 178.
.95 N. Y., 624..
31 Hun, 526.
93 N. Y., 470..
.96 N. Y., 317..

i N. Y. Crim., 533.
..96 N. Y., 149..

.XIX., 222 ..XVII., 145 .XVII., 509

XIV., 417 XVIII., 454 .XVIII. 415 XVIII., 323

..XIX, 73 XVIII., 181 XVIII., 565 XVIII., 449

.XIX, 316 ..XIX., 281

XIX., 181

.XIX., 488 .XVIII., 206 .XVIII.. 286 .XVIII., 532

.XIX., 135 XVIII., 438 XVIII., 66

.XIX., 275 XVIII., 213

.XIX., 322

Tille of Case.

Reported in Full. People v. Ilovey.

1 N. Y. Crim., 477. People v. Irving

.31 Hun, 614.... People v. Irving

95 N. Y., 541. People v. Kelly.

.31 Hun. 225. People v. Kelly.

.94 N. Y., 526. People v. Lane..

.31 Hun, 13.. People v. Meyers

95 N. Y., 223.. People v. Muller..

.32 Hun, 209.. People v. Muller.

..96 N. Y., 408. People v. Noclkc et al.,

.94 N. Y., 137. People v. Norton...

.33 Hun, 277.. People v. Phillips et al.

.30 Hun, 553.. People v. Raymond...

.32 Hun, 123. People v. Raymond.

.96 N. Y., 38. l'cople v. Swales et al.,

.33 Hun, 208. People v. The Cily B’k of Rochester..

93 N. Y., 582. People v. The City B’k of Rochester

.96 N. Y., 32.. People v. The Equitable Trust Co...

.96 N. Y., 387 People v. The Globe Mut. Life Ins. Co..

.32 Hun, 147. People v. The Gold & Stock Tel. Co...

34 Hun, 491.. People v. The Knickerbocker Ice Co....

..32 Hun, 475. People v. The Knickerbocker Life Ins. Co.

..31 Hun, 622. People v. The Metropolitan Telephone & Tel. Co. 1.31 Hun, 596.. People v. The Mutual Trust Co....

.96 N. Y., 10. People v. Thompson.

1 N. Y Crim., 501. People v. Woodward.

.31 Hun, 57 People ex rel. Augerstein et al. v. Kenney et al. .96 N. Y., 294 People ex rc). Browne v. McAdam

2 Civ. Pro., 52. People ex rel. Burch v, Mills..

.32 Hun, 459. People cx rel. Burhaus ct al. v. Sups. of Ulster Co .33 Hun, 607 People ex rel. Cashıman v. Heddon ct al..

.32 Hun, 299 People ex rel. Chamberlain v. Forrest et al

.96 N. Y., 544. People ex rel. Comstock v. Lucas et al....

.9: N. Y., 585. People ex rel. Coulert v. Com's of Taxes..

.31 Hun, 235. People ex rel. Crittenden v. Kecnan...

..31 Hun, 625... People ex rel. Devoc v. Kelly...

..32 Hun, 536. People ex rel. Dickel v. Com'r of Docks.

.33 Hun, 384 People ex re). Evans v. McEwen.....

.67 How., 105. People ex rel. Everett et al. v. Sup'rs of Ulster Co. .93 N. Y., 397. People ex rel. Fitzpatrick v. French et al.... 32 Hun, 112. People ex rel. Flanigan v. Police Com’rs.

..93 N. Y., 97.. People ex rel. Freligh v. Matsell et al....

.91 N. Y., 179. People ex rel. Jessup v. Kelly et al...

.33 Hun, 359.... People ex rel. Johnson v. The Prest., &c., of Whitney's Point....

.32 Ilun, 508. People ex rel. Keech v. Thompson.

.94 N. Y., 451. People ex rel. King v. Gallagher.

.93 N. Y., 438. People ex rel. Lawrence v. Mann et al

.66 How., 337. People ex rel. L'wrence v. Man et al.

..32 Hun, 440, People ex rel. McDonald v. Kecler..

..32 Hun, 563.. People ex rel. Mackenzie v. Sups. of Ulster Co.. .94 N. Y., 203. People ex rel. McManus v. Thompson et al..

.33 Hun, 93. People ex rel. Mann v. Assessors of Covert..

.31 Hun, 421. People ex rel. Mohr v. Police Com'rs..

31 Ilun, 209. People cx rel. Morgan v. Surrogate of N. Y.

.33 Hun, 47. People ex rel. Muller v. The Board of Assessors. .93 N. Y., 308. People ex rel. Newcomb v. McCall....

.94 N. Y., 587. People ex rel. Nubell v. Byrncs ct al..

.33 Hun, 93. People ex rel. Scherer v. Walsh

.33 Hun, 345 People cx rel. Sheridan v. French et al.

31 Hun, 617. People ex rel. Snith v. Shiellein et al...

.95 N. Y., 124. People ex rel. Tallon v. Police Comrs..

.31 Hun, 209. People ex rel. The Mutual Union Tel. Co. v. Comrs. of Taxes:..

.31 Hun, 568..... People ex rel. The N. Y. Med. Coll. & Hospital for Women v. Campbell.

.93 N. Y., 196.... People ex rel. The 230 St. RR. Co. v. Tax Comrs .93 N. Y.. 554... People ex rel. Townshend v. Cady.

.18 J. & S., 399.. People ex rel. Wheeler v. The L. I. RR. Co.. .31 Hun, 125.

Vol. 20–No. 25a.

W. Dig. XVII , 500 XVIII., 335

XIX.. 7 XVIII., 234 XVIII., 483 XVIII., 23 XVIII., 577 .XIX., 256

XIX., 530 XVIII., 134

.XIX., 381 XVIII., 109 .XVIII., 537

.XIX., 1:7

.XIX., 445
.XVIII., 32

.XIX., 119
. XIX., 537
.XIX., 197
.XIX., 213

XIX., 194
XVIII., 492
XVIII., 457

.XIX., 116 .XVIII., 145 .XVIII., 166

XIX., 393
.XIV., 456
XIX., 284
.XIX., 272
.XIX., 173
.XIX., 516
XVIII., 2
XVIII., 368
XVIII., 502

XIX., 205
.XIX., 552

XIX., 196
.XVII., 487
.XVIII., 530

XVII., 281 XVIII., 162 .XIX., 569

.XIX., 301 XVIII., 320 XVIII., 104 .XVIII., 298 .XIX., 290

.XIX., 198 .XVIII., 220 XVIII., 572 .XV 458 .XVIII., 362

.XIX., 138 .XVII., 489 XVIII., 261

.XIX., 357

.XIX.. 511 .XVIII., 378 .XVIII., 519 .XVIII., 362

.XVIII., 524

.XVII., 424
.XIX., 84

XIX., 498
.XVIII., 466

W. Dig. XVIII., 491

.XV., 185

VIII., 430 .XVIII., 426 XVIII., 376

Platt v.

Title of Case.

Reported in Full. Peterson v. Swan

.18 J. & S., 46. Peyser v. Wilcox.

.64 How., 525. Pharis v. Gere.

.31 Hun, 443. Phillips v. The Mayor, &c. of N. Y.

.10 Daly, 278. Phillips et al. v. Wortendyke.

.31 Hun, 192. Phænix Foundry & Mach. Co. v. The North River Const. Co.,

33 Hun. 156. Pierson v. Stafford et al.

..30 Hun, 521. Pitt v. The Phenix Ins. Co.

...10 Daly, 281. Jones.

..96 N. Y., 24. Plimpton et al. v. Bigelow.

.93 N. Y., 592. Porter v. Wormser et al.,

.94 N. Y., 431. Poultney v. Bachmann..

31 Hun, 49. Pratt et al. v. Stevens et al.

.94 N. Y., 387. Pratt M'f'g Co. v. The Jordan Iron & C. Co.. 33 Hun, 143, Prescott v. Tousey et al..

17 J. &. S., 53. Prescolt v. Tousey.

.18 J. & S., 12. Prichard et al. v. Thompson.

.95 N. Y., 76. Price v. Price..

.33 Hun, 70.. Price v. Price..

.33 Hun, 432 Price v. Price et al.,

.33 Hun, 69. Prior y. While et al.

.32 Hun, 14. Purdy v. The Rochester Printing Co..

..96 N. Y., 372. Putnam v. Stewart..

2 Civ. Pro. 172.

XIX., 439 .XVIII., 106 ..XIII., 403 ... XIX., 115 XVIII., 85 .XVIII., 346 .XVIII., 126 .XVIII., 395

XIX., 378
..XVII., 58
XVIII., 468
XVIII., 511

.XIX., 427
XIX., 557
.XIX., 331
.XIX, 70
.XIX., 253
.XIV., 495

Quinlan v. Russell .

.94 N. Y., 350......

XVIII., 392

R.

Rafferty v. Williams et al.....

.18 J. & S.. 66..... Rallings v. Putnam...

.17 J. & S., 307. Ramsey v. Wandell et al.

.32 Hun, 482.. Raynor v. Raynor et al.

.94 N. Y., 248. R:ynor et al. v. The Pacific Natl. Bk.

.93 N Y., 371. Read v. Lozier et al..

31 Hun, 286.. Rector, &c. Christ P. E. Ch. v. Mack et al. .93 N. Y., 488. Reilly v. Coleman.

.62 How., 289.. Reilly v. Sisson.

.31 Hun, 572. Remington Paper Co. v. O'Dougherty..

.32 Hun, 255. Riggs v. The American Tract Soc..

.95 N. Y., 503. Riley v. Sexton..

.32 Hun, 245. Riley v. The Mayor, &c. of N. Y.

..96 N. Y., 3:31. Roach et al. v. Duckworth..

.95 N. Y., 391. Roberts v. Doty..

.31 Hun, 128.. Robinson v. The Natl. Bk. of New Berne.

.95 N. Y., 637.. Roger Wheel Co. v. Fielding et al.,

.31 Hun, 274. Rome Savgs Bk. v. Kramer et al...

32 Hun, 270. Rooney v. The Compagnie Generale Transatlantique. 10 Daly, 241. Ross v. Ross..

.31 Hun, 140. Royal Baking Powder Co. v. Sherill 'et al.

.93 N. Y., 331. Russell v. Dean...

.30 Hun, 242. Ryckman v. Ryckman.

.32 Hun, 193. Ryer v. Ryer...

.33 Hun, 116.

XIX., 311 XVII., 387

XIX., 146 XVIII., 279

XVII., 452
XVIII., 310
XVIII., 3
... XII., 520
XVIII., 352

.XIX., 53
.XIX., 37
XIX., 308
XIX., 391

XIX., 185
XVIII., 465

XIX., 113 .XVIII., 409 XIX., 337

XII., 465 XVIII., 208 XVII., 427 XVIII., 5 XIX, 41 .XIX., 358

S.

Sanford et al. v. Elliothorpe et al
Saulsbury v. The Village of Ithaca
Scheu v. Lelining et al...
Schiele et al. v. Healy et al.
Schoenrock v. Farley..
Schultz v. The Third Ave. RR. Co.,
Schuyler v. Englert et al.
Schwanduer v. Birge et al.
Schwenk et al. v. Naylor

.95 N. Y., 48.
94 N. Y., 27.
.31 Hun, 183.
.10 Daly, 92.

17 J. & S., 302.
.17 J. & S., 95.
..10 Daly, 463.
..33 Hun, 186.

17 J. & S., 98.

XVIII., 423 .XVIII., 102 .XVIII., 261

.XII., 170 .XVII., 308 .XVII., 207 XIV., 571 .XIX., 431 .XVII., 216