229 U.S. Cases Disposed of Without Consideration by the Court.

No. 279. GEORGE W. CURETON, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR, V. THE STATE OF GEORGIA. In error to the Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia. May 12, 1913. Dismissed with costs, on motion of counsel for the plaintiff in error. Mr. J. J. Lynch, Mr. S. P. Maddox and Mr. Geo. D. Lancaster for the plaintiff in error. Mr. Thos. S. Felder for the defendant in error.

No. 989. BONITA DIAZ DE NOYA, APPELLANT, v. SamUEL W. BACKUS, COMMISSIONER OF IMMIGRATION. Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the Northern District of California. May 26, 1913. Dismissed with costs, on motion of Mr. Corry M. Stadden for the appellant. Mr. Marshall B. Woodworth and Mr. Corry M. Stadden for the appellant. The Attorney General for the appellee.

No. 665. WILLIAM BLACKWELL v. THE SOUTHERN PACIFIC COMPANY. On a certificate from the United States Circuit Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. May 26, 1913. Stricken from the docket on motion of Mr. Edward M. Cleary for William Blackwell. Mr. Edward M. Cleary for Blackwell. No appearance for The Southern Pacific Company.

No. 826. ADAMS EXPRESS COMPANY, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR, v. CHAMBERLIN-JOHNSON-DUBOSE COMPANY. In error to the Supreme Court of the State of Georgia. May 26, 1913. Dismissed with costs, on motion of counsel

Cases Disposed of Without Consideration by the Court. 229 U.S.

for the plaintiff in error. Mr. Robert C. Alston for the plaintiff in error. No appearance for the defendant in

error.

No. 827. ADAMS EXPRESS COMPANY, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR, v. CHAMBERLIN-JOHNSON-DU BOSE COMPANY. In error to the Supreme Court of the State of Georgia. May 26, 1913. Dismissed with costs, on motion of counsel for the plaintiff in error. Mr. Robert C. Alston for the plaintiff in error. No appearance for the defendant in

error.

No. 1166. WILSON COAL COMPANY, APPELLANT, v. THE UNITED STATES ET AL.; and

No. 1167. WILSON COAL COMPANY, APPELLANT, v. THE UNITED STATES ET AL. Appeals from the United States Circuit Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. May 26, 1913. Docketed and dismissed on motion of Mr. Assistant to the Attorney General Fowler for the appellees. The Attorney General for the appellees. No one opposing.

No. 411. ADOLPH SUESSKIND, Appellant, v. WILLIAM J. GAYNOR, MAYOR OF THE CITY OF NEW YORK, ET AL. Appeal from the Circuit Court of the United States for the Southern District of New York. June 10, 1913. Dismissed, per stipulation, and cause remanded to the District Court of the United States for the Southern District of New York. Mr. Julius M. Mayer and Mr. A. S. Gilbert for the appellant. Mr. Terence Farley for the appellee.

229 U. S. Cases Disposed of Without Consideration by the Court.

No. 509. JOHN V. DOBSON ET AL., PLAINTIFFS IN ERROR, V. THE VIRGINIA-CAROLINA CHEMICAL COMPANY. In error to the Supreme Court of the State of Tennessee. June 10, 1913. Dismissed with costs, on authority of the plaintiff in error. Mr. John V. Dobson, p. p. . Mr. William A. Henderson for the defendant in error.

In

No. 673. W. S. WRIGHT ET AL., PLAINTIFFS IN ERROR, v. MERCHANTS' TRUST COMPANY, EXECUTOR, ETC. error to the Supreme Court of the State of California. June 10, 1913. Dismissed, per stipulation. Mr. Ernest E. Wood for the plaintiff in error. No appearance for the defendant in error.

No. 993. COL. CHARLES G. TREAT, APPELLANT, v. PASCUAL OROZCO, SR.; and

No. 994. COL. CHARLES G. TREAT, APPELLANT, V. DAVID DE LA FUENTE. Appeals from the District Court of the United States for the Western District of Texas. June 16, 1913. Dismissed with costs, on motion of counsel for the appellant. The Attorney General for the appellant. No appearance for the appellees.

INDEX.

ACCIDENT AND MISTAKE.
See EQUITY, 2, 6.

ACCOUNTS AND ACCOUNTING

See CONTRACTS, 1, 2;

INDIANS, 7;

PRINCIPAL AND SURETY, 3.

ACTIONS.

Bad faith in bringing; effect of subsequent adverse decision of issues in
another action.

A plaintiff is not to be charged with bad faith in bringing an action
simply because after it was commenced the same issue was raised
and decided adversely in an action between other parties. Wheeler
v. Denver, 342.

ANTI-TRUST ACT of July 2, 1890, 26 Stat. 209, c. 647 (see Anti-Trust
Act): Nash v. United States, 373.

ARMY AND NAVY.-Act of June 29, 1906, 34 Stat. 553, c. 3590 (see
Army and Navy, 1): Morse v. United States, 208. Act of August 3,
1861, § 23, 12 Stat. 287, c. 42 (see Army and Navy, 1): Ib. Rev.
Stat., § 1558 (see Army and Navy, 1): Ib.
BANKRUPTCY ACT of July 1, 1898, 30 Stat. 544, c. 541 (see Bankruptcy,
10, 13): Continental Trust Co. v. Chicago Title Co., 435; Studley v.
Boylston National Bank, 523. Section 67f (see Bankruptcy, 7, 8):
Chicago, B. & Q. Ry. Co. v. Hall, 511. Section 68a (see Bankruptcy,
17, 19): Studley v. Boylston National Bank, 523; Continental Trust
Co. v. Chicago Title Co., 435. Section 70b (see Bankruptcy, 16):
Roberts v. Howard, 254. Section 70f (see Bankruptcy, 6): Chicago,
B. & Q. Ry. Co. v. Hall, 511.

(635)