American Institute of Mining & Metallurgical Engineers_ American-Marietta Co.. American Motors.. American Radiator & Standard Sanitary Corp. American Society of Metals. Ames Laboratory. Anbro, Paul. Anderson, Admiral George__ Page 1352 2674 2563, 2565 2563, 2565, 2566 1370 1352 1238, 1248 46, 47, 59, 60, 64, 65, 75, 79, 309, 342, 375, 380, 389, 642, 660, No consultation with, between briefing and decision.. Presentation of recommendation to.. Recommended Boeing to. Lighter weight aircraft desired_ 778, 788, 789 778, 798 780 793 780, 791, 792 778, 780, 787, 790 779 Anderson, Roy H. 6, 101, 372, 449, 480, 496, 521, 595, 663, 695, 886, 913-915, 944, 981, 1419 Appropriations Committee of the U.S. Senate. 2250, 2284, 2285, 2293 Armed Services Committee, U.S. Senate. 2125, 2472, 2480, 2483, 2484 775, 1297, 1385, 1386, 1462, 1463, 1469, 1684, 1858, 2480 Arnold, Gen. "Hap" 2230 Art services___ 1036 Arthur Anderson Co... 1561, 1562, 1691, 1791 Page Asensio, Lt. Gen. Manuel J.. Ashworth, Rear Adm. Frederick L.. 2634, 2661, 2663, 2669 58, 71, 450, 451, 453-455, 461-463, 465-468, 470, 474, 475, Acceptable with changes versus unacceptable without major changes, Airscoops Aluminum.. Arresting gear.. Assistant Chief of the Bureau of Naval Weapons for R.D.T. & E. 490, 491 640-642 488 691 518, 659 649, 650 490 451 682-684 664, 718, 726 505 643 665, 666 665,666 639, 640 665 665 665 665 657, 658 Operational advantages_ Preparation for fourth evaluation consistent with Mr. Gilpatric's Arresting gear_ Acceptable with changes.. General Electric engine, used. Catapulting Pratt & Whitney engine used in alternate proposal... Rate of climb.. Wind-over-the-deck_. Second evaluation: mendation of Boeing.. Lockheed Aircraft Co. North American acceptable with changes.. Republic Aviation Co... Letter to Aircraft Systems Division, January 8, 1962, re Letter to Air Force Council, January 23, 1962, re recom- McDonnell Aircraft Corp.. 489 493 489 489 465, 489 489 494 494 Amended work statement not met fully. Area of evaluation expanded- Boeing did not propose two different airplanes. 504, 505 502 657 Boeing preferred. 648 General Dynamics, changes necessary. 505 Either plane acceptable_- 502, 506 No significant preference of design as submitted. 647, 648 511 Height of aircraft.. 507 Joint program, attitude toward.. 519 498, 500, 501, 505, 517, 518, 629–634, 643-645, 658, 664, 692, 693 Gilpatric letter of July 13, 1962, to contractors, comments about Joint aircraft programs.. Jones' memorandums_ Korth, Secretary of the Navy: Meeting with November 8, 1962.. Navy briefing given to, by Capt. John Shepherd.. Navy takes heavier plane "to accommodate Air Force". 490-492 Ashworth, Rear Adm. Frederick L.-Continued Navy flight-strength level.. Pratt & Whitney engine.. Prototype competition. Rate of climb... Services should build separate planes... Shepherd, Capt. John: Briefed Secretary of the Navy Korth.. Source Selection Board: Boeing recommended as source. Chief of Naval Operations, difference of opinion between__ Page 646 491, 492, 499 715 490 726 660 648 664, 665 489 640 Fourth evaluation: Buffet limit.... Navy member on, voted for Boeing. Present at all four evaluations of 475 461, 462, 476 492 492 492 467 501, 502 512 501 650, 651, 692, 693 501, 503, 504 479 667 496 451, 665 470 479 493 492, 493 494 Letter to contractors, June 5, 1962, re Navy deficiencies.. 511 499 498, 499 499 499 669 691 649, 650 692, 693 467 508, 509, 511, 512, 718 518,658, 659 507 495, 515, 516, 518, 648-650 659 499-501, 506, 507, 516, 517, 618, 665 490, 491, 609-611 657 517 495, 516 513-515 495 513 503, 504 399-401, 1265, 1769 655, 684, 1208, 1898, 2299, 2480 2563, 2565 Wing design, Navy version. Wing tip extensions proposed by General Dynamics_ B-58 program: Gilpatric, R. L., Deputy Secretary of Defense B. F. Goodrich Co............. Badger, J. H....... Bailey, Charles M. Baker, Newton D. Page 2524-2528, 2538 1572, 2563, 2565, 2634 2137 2623-2636, 2650, 2722, 2725, 2726 1370 1681, 1731, 1762, 1803, 1833, 1862, 2127, 2157, 2177, 2233, 2261 875, 901 2694 1577, 1686, 1688, 1716, 1728-1730, 1732, 1733, 1735, 1856, 1860 879, 883, 886-890, 892, 893, 899-901, 904–906, 911, 2102 McNamara, Secretary of Defense: Meeting with... Air Force cost estimates, methodology. General Accounting Office, Associate Director of Defense Accounting Considered Air Force cost estimates unreliable.. Bell, Lawrence D. Bennett, Maj. Gen. T. A.. 58, 71, 450, 451, 457, 480, 522, 529, 534, 552, 595, 617-620, 622, Background.. 618 Boeing plane, considered best. 671, 672 Commonality. 617, 618, 632 Costs.. 619 Director of maintenance engineering, Air Force Logistics Command.. |