Ought to be proportioned to the proofs, 642, s 1.
Association of ideas, 336, s 1, &c. This association how made, 338, s 6. Il effects of it, as to antipathies, 338, s 7, 8; 340, s 15. And this in sects of philosophy and religion, 341, s 18. Its ill influence as to intellectual habits, ib. s 17.
Assurance, 602, s 6.
Atheism in the world, 46, s 8. Atom, what, 260, s 3. Authority: relying on others' opin- ions, one great cause of error, 652, s 17.
Belief, what, 596, s 3. To believe without reason, is against our duty, 624, 8 24.
Best in our opinion, not a rule of God's actions, 51, s 12.
Blind man, if made to see, would not know which a globe, which a cube, by
Analogy, useful in natural philoso his sight, though he knew them by his
phy, 605, s 12.
Anger, 173, 8 12, 14.
Antipathy and sympathy, whence, 338, s 7.
Arguments of four sorts: 1. Ad vere- cundiam, 624, s 19. 2. Ad ignoran- tiam, ib. 8 20. 3. Ad hominem, 625, 4. Ad judicium, ib. s 22. This
s 21. alone right, ib. s 22. Arithmetic: the use of cyphers in arithmetic, 505, s 19,
Artificial things are most of them collective ideas, 250, s 3. Why we are less liable to confusion about artificial things, than about natural, 403, 8 40. Have distinct species, ib. s 41.
Assent to maxims, 15, s 10. Upon hearing and understanding the terms,
Assent, a mark of self-evidence, 19, s 18. Not of inuate, 19, s 18—20; 56, $ 19.
Assent to probability, 596, s 3.
Blood, how it appears in a micro- scope, 235, s 11.
Brutes have no universal ideas, 111, s 10, 11. Abstract not, 111, s 10.
Body. We have no more primary ideas of body than of spirit, 239, s 16. The primary ideas of body, ib. s 17. The extension or cohesion of body, as hard to be understood, as the thinking of spirit, 241, s 23-2. Moving of bo- dy by body, as hard to be conceived as by spirit, 244, s 28. Operates only by impulse, 90, s 11. What, 121, s 11. The author's notion of the body, 2 Cor. v. 10, 280. And of his own body, 1 Cor, xv. 35, &c. 283. The meaning of the same body, 278. Whether the word body be a simple or complex term, 281. This only a controversy about the sense of a word, 292.
But, its several significations, 410,
CAPACITY, 117, s 3. Capacities, to know their extent, use- ful, 2, 8 4. To cure scepticism and idleness, 4, s 6. Are suited to our pre- sent state, 3, s 5.
Cause, 255, s 1. And effect, ib. Certainty depends on intuition, 464, 8 1. Wherein it consists, 524, s 18. Of truth, 524, s 1. To be had in very few general propositions, concerning substances, 538, s 13. Where to be had, 540, s 16. Verbal, 528, s8. Real, ib. Sensible knowledge, the utmost certainty we have of existence, 575, s 2. The author's notion of it not danger- ous, 456, &c. How it differs from as- surance, 602, s 6.
Changelings, whether men or no,
Clearness alone hinders confusion of ideas, 108, s 3.
Clear and obscure ideas, 308, s 2. Colours, modes of colours, 167, s 4. Comments upon law, why infinite, 417, s 9.
Complex ideas how made, 109, s 6; 114, s . In these the mind is more than passive, 115, s 2. Ideas reducible to modes, substances, and relations, ib.
Comparing ideas, 109, s 4. men excel brutes, ib. s 5. Compounding ideas, ib. s 6.
is a great difference between men and brutes, 110, 8 7. Compulsion, 180, s 13. Confidence, 603, s 7. Confusion of ideas, wherein it con- sists, 309, s 5-7. Causes of confusion in ideas, 310, 311, s 7-9; 312,s 12. Of ideas, grounded on a reference to names, 311, 312, s 10-12. Its remedy, 312. Confused ideas, 309, s 4. [s 12, Conscience is our own opinion of our own actions, 31, s 8.
Consciousness makes the same per- son, 265, s 10; 269, s 16. Probably annexed to the same individual, imma- terial substance, 274, s 25. Necessary to thinking, 66, s 10, 11; 72, s 19. What, ib. s 19.
Contemplation, 102, s 1.
Creation, 255, s 2. Not to be denied, because we cannot conceive the man- ner how, 574, s 19.
DEFINITION, why the genus is used in definitions, 352, s 10. Defining of terms would cut off a great part of disputes, 433, s 15.
Demonstration, 466, s 3. Not so clear as intuitive'knowledge,lib. s 4-6; 467, s 7. Intuitive knowledge neces
sary in each step of a demonstration, ib. s 7. Not limited to quantity, 468, 89. Why that has been supposed, ib. s 10. Not to be expected in all cases, 580, s 10. What, 595, s 1; 622, s 15.
Desire, 172, s 6. Is a state of unea- siness, 188-9, s 31, 32. Is moved only by happiness, 194, s 41. How far, 195, s 43. How to be raised, 197, s 46. Misled by wrong judgment, 206, s 60. Dictionaries, how to be made, 455,
Discerning, 107, s 1. The founda- tion of some general maxims, 107, s 1. Discourse, cannot be between two men, who have different names for the same idea, or different ideas for the same name, 83, s 5.
Despair, 173, s 11. Disposition, 223, s 10.
Disputing: the art of disputing pre- judicial to knowledge, 428—430, s 6—9. Destroys the use of language, 430, s 10.
Disputes, whence, 128, s 28. Mul tiplicity of them owing to the abuse of words, 437, s 22. Are most about the signification of words, 444, s 7. Distance, 117, s 3.
Distinct ideas, 309, s 4. Divisibility of matter incomprehen- sible, 246, s 31.
Dreaming, 169, s 1. Seldom in some men, 69, s 14.
Dreams, for the most part irrational, 70, s 16. In dreams no ideas but of sensation or reflection, ib. s 17.
Duration, 129, § 1, 2. Whence we get the idea of duration, 180-1, s 3-5. Not from motion, 134, s 16. Its measure, ib. s 17, 18. Any regular periodical appearance, 185, s 19, 20. None of its measures known to be exact, 186, s 21. We only guess them equal by the train of our ideas, ib. s 21. Minutes, days, years, &c. not necessary to duration, 138, s 23. Change of the measures of duration, change not the notion of it, ib. s 23. The measures of duration, as the revolutions of the sun, may be ap- plied to duration before the sun exist- ed, 138-140, s 24, 25, 28. Duration without beginning, 139, s 26. How we measure duration, 189, 140, s 27-9. Recapitulation, concerning our ideas of duration, time, and eternity, 141, s 81.
Duration and expansion compared, 142, sl. They mutually embrace each other, 150, s 12. Considered as a line, 148, s 11. Duration not conceivable by us without succession, 149, s 12.
EDUCATION, partly the cause of unreasonableness, 337, s 3.
Enthusiasm, 623. Described, 635-6, s 6, 7. Its rise, 635, s 5. Ground of persuasion must be examined, and how, 637, s 10. Firmness of it no sufficient proof, 639, s 12, 13. Fails of the evi- dence it pretends to, 688, s 11.
Envy, 173, s 13, 14.
Error, what, 642, s 1. Causes of error, ib. 1. Want of proofs, ib. s 2. 2. Want of skill to use them, 644, s 5. 3. Want of will to use them, 645, s 6. 4. Wrong measures of probability,646, s 7, Fewer men assent to errors, than is supposed, 653, s 18.
Essence, real and nominal, S61, s 15. Supposition of unintelligible, real es- sences of species, of no use, 362, s 17. Real and nominal essences, in simple ideas and modes always the same, in substance always different, ib. s 18.
Essences, how ingenerable and incor- ruptible, 363, s 19. Specific essences of mixed modes are of men's making, and how, 372, s 3. Though arbitrary, yet not at random, 374, s 7. Of mixed modes, why called notions, 378, s 12. What, 381, s 2. Relate only to species, ib. s 4. Real essences, what, 383, s 6. We know them not, 385, s 9. Our specific essences of substances, nothing but collections of sensible ideas, 390, s 21. Nominal are made by the mind, 394, s 26. But not altogether arbi- trarily, 395, s 28. Nominal essences of substances, how made, ib. s 28, 29. Are very various, 396, s 30; 398, s 31. Of species, are the abstract ideas the names stand for, 355, s 12; 363, s 19. Are of man's making, 358, s 12. But founded in the agreement of things, 359, s 13. Real essences determine not our species, 360, s 13. Every distinct, abstract idea, with a name, is a distinct essence of a distinct species, ib. s 14. Real essences of substances, not to be known, 537, s 12.
Essential, what, 381, s 2; 382, 8 5. Nothing essential to individuals, 381, s 4. But to species, 383, 86. Essen- tial difference, what, 382, s 5.
Eternal verities, 582, s 14. Eternity, in our disputes and reason- ings about it, why we are apt to blun- der, 314, s 15. Whence we get its idea, 139, s 27.
Evil, what, 194, s 42. Existence, an idea of sensation and reflection, 87, 8 7. Our own existence we know intuitively, 565, s 2. And cannot doubt of it, ib. Of creatable things, knowable only by our senses,
Faith and opinion, as distinguished from knowledge, what, 596, s 2, 3. And knowledge, their difference, ib. s 3. What, 608, s 14. Not oppo- site to reason, 625, s 24. As contra- distinguished to reason, what, 627, s 2. Cannot convince us of any thing con. trary to our reason, 629, &c. s 5, 6, 8. Matter of faith is only divine revela- tion, 632, s 9. Things above reason are only proper matters of faith, 631, s 7; 632, & 9.
Falsehood, what it is, 528, s 9. Fancy, 106, s 8.
Fantastical ideas, 316, s 1. Fear, 175, s 10. Figure, 118, s 5, 6.
Figurative speech, an abuse of lan- guage, 441, s 34.
Finite, and infinite, modes of quan- tity, 154, s 1. All positive ideas of quantity, finite, 158, s 8.
Forms, substantial forms distinguish not species, 386, s 10.
Free, how far a man is so, 184, s 21. A man not free to will, or not to will, 184, 185, s 22—24.
Freedom belongs only to agents, 182, Wherein it consists, 186, s 37. Free will, liberty belongs not to the will, 180, 8 14. Wherein consists that which is called free will, 185, s 24; 198, s 47.
GENERAL ideas, how made, 110, 89. Knowledge, what, 514, s 31.. Propositions cannot be known to be true, without knowing the essence of the species, 530, s 4. Words, how
made, 347-8, s 6-8. Belong only to signs, 353, s 11.
Gentlemen should not be ignorant, 646, 8 6.
Geans and species, what, 352, s 10. Are but Latin names for sorts, 376, s 9. Is but a partial conception of what is in the species, 398, s 32. And species, adjusted to the end of speech, $99, s 32. And species, are made in order to ge- neral names, 402, s 39.
Generation, 255, § 2.
God immoveable, because infinite, 240, s 21. Fills immensity, as well as eternity, 143, s 3. His duration not like that of the creatures, 149, s 12. An idea of God not innate 46, s 8. The existence of a God evident, and obvious to reason, 48, s 9. The notion of a God once got, is the likeliest to spread and be continued, 50, s 9, 10. Idea of God, late and imperfect, 52, s 13. Contrary, 53, 54, s 15, 16. Inconsistent, 53, s 15. The best notions of God, got by thought and application, 54, s 15. Notions of God frequently not worthy of him, ib. The being of a God certain, ib.; proved, 565, s 1. As evident, as that the three angles of a triangle are equal to two right ones, 59, s 22. Yea, as that two opposite augles are equal, 55,
More certain than any other ex- istence without us, 567, s 6. The idea of God not the only proof of his exist- ence, ib. s 7. The being of a God, the foundation of morality and divinity, ib. 8 7. How we make our idea of God, 247, s 33, 34.
Gold is fixed; the various significa- tions of this proposition, 408, s 50. Wa- ter strained through it, 82, s 4.
Good and evil, what, 171, s 2; 194,
The greater good determines not the will, 190, s 35; 192, s 38; 196, 8 44. Why, ib. s 44; 197, s 46; 205, &c.; s 59, 60, 64, 65, 68. Twofold, 206, s 61. Works on the will only by desire, 197, $ 46. Desire of good how to be raised, 197, 8 46, 47.
HABIT, 223, s 10. Habitual actions pass often without our notice, 100, s 10.
Hair, how it appears in a micro- scope, 235, s 11.
Happiness, what, 194, s 42. What happiness men pursue, 195, s 43. How we come to rest in narrow happiness,
205, 206, s 59, 60.
Hardness, what, 82, s 4. Hatred, 172, s 5; 173, s 14.
Ideas, their original in children, 44, s 2; 53, s 13. None innate, 55, s 17. Because not remembered, 56, s 20. Are what the mind is employed about in thinking, 62, s 1. All from sensation or reflection, ib. s 2, &c. How this is to be understood, 475. Their way of get- ting, observable in children, 64, $6. Why some have more, some fewer, ideas, 65, 87. Of reflection got late, and in some very negligently, ib. s 8. Thier beginning and increase in child- ren, 73, 74, s 21—24 Their original in sensation and reflection, 74, s 24. Of one sense, 78, s 1. Want names, 79, s 2. Of more than one sense, 84. Of reflec- tion, ib. s 1. Of sensation and reflec- tion, ib. s 1. As in the mind, and in things, must be distinguished, 89, s 7. Not always resemblances, 91, s 15, &c. Which are first, is not material to know, 98, s 7. Of sensation often altered by the judgment, 99, s 8. Principally those of sight, 100, s 9. Of reflection, 113, s 14. Simple ideas men agree in, 198, s 28. Moving in a regular train in our minds, 132, s 9. Such as have degrees, want names, 167, s 6. Why some have names, and others not, ib. s 7. Orig- inal, 217, s 73. All complex ideas re- solvable into simple, 221, s 9. What simple ideas have been most modified, 222, s 10. Our complex idea of God, and other spirits, common in every thing but infinity, 248, s 36. Clear and obscure, 308, s 2. Distinct and con- fused, 309, s 4. May be clear in one part and obscure in another, $13, s 13. Real and fantastical, 316, s 1. Simple, are all real, 315, s 2. And adequate, 319, s 2. What ideas of mixed modes are fantastical, 317, s 4. What ideas of substances are fantastical, 318, s 5. Adequate and inadequate, 319, s 1. How said to be in things, ib. s 2. Modes are all adequate ideas, 320, s 3. Un- less as referred to names, 321, s 4, 5. Of substances inadequate, 325, s 11. 1. As referred to real essences, 321, s 6; 523, s 7. 2. As referred to a collection of Simple ideas
Heat and cold, how the sensation of simple ideas, 324, s 8.
are perfect xruma, 326, s 12.
stances are perfect ixruña, ib. s 15. Of modes are perfect archetypes, ib. s 14. True or false, 327, s 1, &c. When false, 334-5, s 21-25. As bare appear- ances in the mind, neither true nor false, $27, s 3. As referred to other men's ideas, or to real existence, or to real essences, may be true or false, 328, 8 4, 5. Reason of such refer- ence, 328-9, s 6-8. Simple ideas refer- red to other men's ideas, least apt to be false, 329, s 9. Complex ones, in this respect, more apt to be false, espe- cially those of mixed modes, 330, s 10. Simple ideas referred to existence, are all true, $31, s 14; 332, s 16. Though they should be different in different men, 331, s 15. Complex ideas of modes are all true, 332, s 17. Of substances when false, 334, s 21, &c. When right or wrong, 356, s 26. That we are in. capable of, 507, s 23. That we cannot attain, because of their remoteness, 508, s 24. Because of their minuteness, 509, s 25. Simple, have a real conformity to things, 516, s 4. And all others, but of substances, ib. s 5. Simple, cannot be got by definition of words, 367, s 11. But only by experience, 369, s 14. Of mix- ed modes, why most compounded, 378, s 13. Specific, of mixed modes, how at first made: instance in kinneah and niouph, 404-5, s 44, 45. Of substan- ces: instance in zahab, 406, s 46, 47. Simple ideas and modes have all ab stract, as well as concrete, names, 412, s 2. Of substances, have scarce any ab- stract names, ib. Different in different men, 419, s 13. Our ideas almost all relative, 175, s 3. Particulars, are first in the mind, 416, s 9. General are im- perfect, 417, s 9. How positive ideas may be from privative causes, 88, s 4. The use of this term not dangerous, 5, &c. It is fitter than the word notion, 7. Other words as liable to be abused as this, ib. Yet it is condemned, both as new and not new, 8. The same with notion, sense, meaning, &c. 459. Identical propositions teach nothing, 556, s 2.
Idiots and madmen, 111, 112, s 12, 13. Ignorance, our ignorance infinitely exceeds our knowledge, 507, s 22. 1. For Causes of ignorance, ib. s 23. want of ideas, ib. 2. For want of a discoverable connection between the ideas we have, 511, s 28. 3. For want of tracing the ideas we have, 513, s 30. Illation, what, 609, s 2.
Immensity, 117, s 4. How this idea is got, 155, s 3.
Immoralities of whole nations, 51, s 9; 32, s 10.
Immortality, not annexed to any shape, 522, s 15. Impenetrability, 80, s 1. Imposition of opinions unreasonable, 601, s 4.
Impossibile est idem esse et non esse, not the first thing known, 24, s 25. Impossibility, not an innate idea, 44,
Impression on the mind, what, 12, 85. Inadequate ideas, 308, s 1. Incompatibility, how far knowable, 501, s 15.
Individuationis principium, is exist- ence, 260, s 3.
Infallible judge of controversies, 51,
Inference, what, 594-5, s 2-4.
Infinite, why the idea of infinite not applicable to other ideas as well as those of quantity, since they can be as often repeated, 159, s 6. The idea of infinity of space or number, and of space or number infinite, must be distinguish- ed, 157, 87. Our idea of infinite, very Number furnishes obscure, 158, s 8.
us with the clearest ideas of infinite, ib. s 9. The idea of infinite, a grow. ing idea, 160, s 12. Our idea of infinite, partly positive, partly comparative, partly negative, 161, s 15. Why some men think they have an idea of infinite duration, but not of infinite space, 164, s 20. Why disputes about infinity are usually perplexed, 165, s 21. Our idea of infinity has its original in sensation We have no and reflection, ib. s 22. positive idea of infinite, 160, s 13, 14; 162, s 16.
Infinity, why more commonly allow- Identity, not an innate idea, 44-5, s 3-5. And diversity, 258, s 1. Of a ed to duration than to expansion, 143, plant, wherein it consists, 261, s 4. Ofs 4. How applied to God by us, 154, s 1. How we get this idea, 154-5, s 2, 3. animals, ib. s 5. Of a man, ib. s 6; 262, s 8. Unity of substance does not The infinity of number, duration, and always make the same identity 262, s 7. space, different ways considered, 148, Personal identity, 264, s 9. Depends s 10, 11. on the same consciousness, 265, s 10. Continued existence makes identity, 276, s 29. And diversity, in ideas, the first perception of the mind, 456, s 4.
Innate truths must be the first known, 25, s 26. Principles to no purpose, if men can be ignorant or doubtful of them, 24, s 13. Principles of my Lo
« AnteriorContinuar » |