The Supreme Court Reporter, Volumen18West Publishing Company, 1899 |
Dentro del libro
Resultados 1-5 de 100
Página 34
... ERROR TO STATE SUPREME COURT - DELAY IN SET- TING UP FEDERAL RIGHT . 1. A writ of error to a state supreme court cannot be sustained on the ground that the va- lidity of a state statute , under the constitution of the United States ...
... ERROR TO STATE SUPREME COURT - DELAY IN SET- TING UP FEDERAL RIGHT . 1. A writ of error to a state supreme court cannot be sustained on the ground that the va- lidity of a state statute , under the constitution of the United States ...
Página 35
... error . Wayne MacVeagh and Howard C. Slurk , for defendant in error . Mr. Chief Justice FULLER , after stating the facts in the foregoing language , delivered the opinion of the court . The contention of plaintiff in error is that the ...
... error . Wayne MacVeagh and Howard C. Slurk , for defendant in error . Mr. Chief Justice FULLER , after stating the facts in the foregoing language , delivered the opinion of the court . The contention of plaintiff in error is that the ...
Página 36
... error . Enoch Totten and William Henry Dennis , for defendant in error . * Mr . Justice PECKHAM delivered the opin- ion of the court . This action was brought by the plaintiff in error to recover damages from the defend- ant corporation ...
... error . Enoch Totten and William Henry Dennis , for defendant in error . * Mr . Justice PECKHAM delivered the opin- ion of the court . This action was brought by the plaintiff in error to recover damages from the defend- ant corporation ...
Página 65
... error , that there was no competent evidence to show that their patents were an infringement up- on the prior patents , was not specially as- signed as error , either in the appellate court or in the supreme court of the state , and is ...
... error , that there was no competent evidence to show that their patents were an infringement up- on the prior patents , was not specially as- signed as error , either in the appellate court or in the supreme court of the state , and is ...
Página 68
... error in the record , and the judgment must be aflirmed . ( 168 U. S. 339 ) WARNER V. BALTIMORE & O. R. CO . ( November 29 , 1897. ) No. 82 . CARRIERS OF PASSENGERS - NEGLIGENCE . 1. A railroad company owes to one standing to it in the ...
... error in the record , and the judgment must be aflirmed . ( 168 U. S. 339 ) WARNER V. BALTIMORE & O. R. CO . ( November 29 , 1897. ) No. 82 . CARRIERS OF PASSENGERS - NEGLIGENCE . 1. A railroad company owes to one standing to it in the ...
Otras ediciones - Ver todas
Términos y frases comunes
act of congress action affirmed aforesaid alleged amendment amount Andrew Johnson appointed approved assessment Atlantic & Pacific attorney authority bill bond bottomry certificates charge circuit court claim complainant constitution construction consul contract court of appeals court of equity Craney Island decision declared decree deed defendant district court duty entitled equity evidence executed fact fees filed Filhiol fourteenth amendment grant Harlem Extension Railroad held indictment interest issue judgment jurisdiction jury Justice land Lebanon Springs Railroad lien Maxwell Land-Grant ment mortgage owner Pacific Railroad Company paid pany parties patent payment person petition petitioner plaintiff in error possession proceedings purchase purpose question Railway rates reason received road rule sion Southern Pacific Railroad Stat statute suit supreme court territory therein thereof tion tract trial United valid vessel writ of error
Pasajes populares
Página 105 - ... in every such action the jury may give such damages as they may think proportioned to the injury resulting from such death to the parties respectively for whom and for whose benefit such action shall be brought...
Página 205 - ... every alternate section of public land, not mineral, designated by odd numbers, to the amount of twenty alternate sections per mile, on each side of said railroad line, as said company may adopt, through the Territories of the United States, and ten alternate sections of land per mile on each side of said railroad whenever it passes through any State, and whenever on the line thereof, the United States have full title, not reserved, sold, granted or otherwise appropriated, and free from preemption,...
Página 215 - ... as near as may be, to the practice, pleadings, aud forms and modes of proceeding existing at the time in like causes in the courts of record of the state within which such circuit or district courts are held, any rule of court to the contrary notwithstanding.
Página 18 - The general principle announced in numerous cases is that a right, question or fact distinctly put in issue and directly determined by a court of competent jurisdiction, as a ground of recovery, cannot be disputed in a subsequent suit between, the same parties or their privies...
Página 228 - Nothing can call forth this court into activity but conscience, good faith, and reasonable diligence. Where these are wanting, the court is passive and does nothing. Laches and neglect are always discountenanced; and therefore from the beginning of this jurisdiction there was always a limitation to suits in this court.
Página 294 - Court, at any time after such suit has been brought or removed thereto, that such suit does not really and substantially involve a dispute or controversy properly within the jurisdiction of said Circuit Court...
Página 388 - The former naturally desire to obtain as much labor as possible from their employees, while the latter are often induced by the fear of discharge to conform to regulations which their judgment, fairly exercised, would pronounce to be detrimental to their health or strength. In other words, the proprietors lay down the rules and the laborers are practically constrained to obey them. In such cases self-interest is often an unsafe guide, and the legislature may properly interpose its authority.
Página 60 - But where the second action between the same parties is upon a different claim or demand, the judgment in the prior action operates as an estoppel only as to those matters in issue or points controverted, upon the determination of which the finding or verdict was rendered.
Página 389 - The taking, receiving, reserving, or charging a rate of interest greater than is allowed by the preceding section, when knowingly done, shall be deemed a forfeiture of the entire interest which the note, bill, or other evidence of debt carries with it, or which has been agreed to be paid thereon.
Página 416 - And in order to ascertain that value, the original cost of construction, the amount expended in permanent improvements, the amount and market value of its bonds and stock, the present as compared with the original cost of construction, the probable earning capacity of the property under particular rates prescribed by statute, and the sum required to meet operating expenses, are all matters for consideration, and are to be given such weight as may be just and right in each case. We do not say that...