 There is an obvious distinction between a cropper and a tenant. One has a possession of the premises, exclusive of the landlord, the other has not. The one has a right for a fixed time, the other has only a right to go on the land to plant, work and gather...  A Short History of Reconstruction - Página 269por Eric Foner - 2010 - 320 páginasVista previa limitada - Acerca de este libro
 | Georgia. Supreme Court - 1873 - 764 páginas
...one has a right for 3 The Cape Fear Steamboat Company va. Torrent et al. fixed time; the other has only a right to go on the land to plant, work and gather the crop. The possession of the land i» with the owner as against the cropper. This is not so of the tenant.... | |
 | Abram Warren Thompson - 1876 - 556 páginas
...premises exclusive of the landlord, the other has not. The one has a right for a fixed time, the other has only a right to go on the land to plant, work, and gather the crop. The possession of the land is with the owner as against the cropper, This is not so of the tenant."... | |
 | Charles Greenstreet Addison - 1888 - 864 páginas
...tenancy. The title to the crop subject to the wages is in the owner of the land, the cropper only having a right to go on the land to plant, work, and gather the crop. Appling v. Odom, 46 Ga. 583. See also Huffr. Watkins, 15 8. C. 82. Letting land to a person for one... | |
 | 1904 - 1122 páginas
...exclusive of the land owner, the other has not. The one has a right for a fixed time, the other has only a right to go on the land to plant, work, and gather the crop. The possession of the land is with the owner as against the cropper. This is not so of toe tenant.... | |
 | Enoch Marvin Banks - 1905 - 158 páginas
...exclusive of the landlord; the other has not. The one has a right for a fixed time ; the other has only a right to go on the land to plant, work and gather the crop. The possession of the land is with the owner as against the cropper. This is not so of the tenant.... | |
 | 1912 - 542 páginas
...premises, exclusive of the landlord, the other has not. The one has a right for a fixed time, the other has only a right to go on the land to plant, work and gather the crop. The possession of the land is with the owner as against the cropper. The case made in the record is... | |
 | Robert Preston Brooks - 1914 - 142 páginas
...premises, exclusive of the landlord, the other has not. The one has a right for a fixed time, the other has only a right to go on the land to plant, work and gather the crop. The possession of the land is with the owner as against the cropper. The case made in the record is... | |
 | George Simon Wehrwein - 1922 - 450 páginas
...premises, exclusive of the landlord; the other has not. The one has a right for a fixed time; the other has only a right to go on the land, to plant, work and gather the crop. The possession of land is with the owner as against the oropper. This is not so of the tenant. ., .The... | |
 | Chunchang Gao - 2000 - 340 páginas
...court decisions of Georgia a defined sharecropper not as a "partner." but as a wage laborer owning "only a right to go on the land to plant. work. and gather the crop." 1008 If blacks tried to go on strike. their leaders were soon arrested. and the strike crushed.1009... | |
| |
