...Protection Clause. That doubt has been completely dispelled so long as, the Court in Hancari said, the special treatment can be rationally tied to the fulfillment of Congress' unique obligation to Indians. Reid Charters, Ouard Barnes, and Qavid Jones of our Division mrfced closely with the Justice...

...legislative judgment should not be disturbed "as long as the special treatment can be tied rationally to the fulfillment of Congress' unique obligation toward the Indians . . . ." Morton v. Mancari, supra, at 555. III We are persuaded on the record before us that Congress' omission of the appellee...

...legislative judgments should not be disturbed *[a]s long as the special treatment can be tied rationally to the fulfillment of Congress 'unique obligation toward the Indians. . * Morton v. Mancari r , at 555.' Id. at 84-85. 5. Dnited States v. Antelope. 430 US 641 (1977). In an opinion written by...

...Navajo Tribe from challenging, at some future date, the transfers that would be effected by HR 4281. The fact that it creates a disparity between the treatment...treatment can be rationally tied to the fulfillment of Congress1 unique obligation toward the Indians." Morton v. Mancari. 417 US 535, 555 (1971) and Delaware...

...statutes have been sustained by the Supreme Court "as long as the special treatment can be tied rationally to the fulfillment of Congress' unique obligation toward the Indians." Morton v. Mancari. 417 US 535 (1974). In order to enforce effectively the Buy Indian Act's intent to benefit exclusively...

...origin, still the Court has held that such classifications are valid if they "can be tied rationally to the fulfillment of Congress' unique obligation toward the Indians." Morton v. Mancari. 417 US 535, 555 (1974). 577 Testimony on Federal Death Penalty Legislation Turtle Mountain Chippewa...

...throughout all fifty states? No. Federal Indian policy, as set by Congress, must be "tied rationally to the fulfillment of Congress' unique obligation toward the Indians," Morton v. Mancari. 417 US 535, 555 (1974). This obligation requires adherence to "the most exacting fiduciary standards."...

...throughout all fifty states? No. Federal Indian policy, as set by Congress, must be "tied rationally to the fulfillment of Congress' unique obligation toward the Indians," Morton v Mancan. 417 US 535, 555 (1974). This obligation requires adherence to "the most exacting fiduciary...

...programs has limits. The Supreme Court has held federal Indian legislation must be tied rationally to the fulfillment of Congress' unique obligation toward the Indians. Morton v. Mancari, 417 US 535, 555 (1974). Where the circumstances of Indian legislation demonstrate such a rational connection,...

...singling out Indians for special treatment, such special treatment must at least be "tied rationally to the fulfillment of Congress' unique obligation toward the Indians. . . ." Morton v. Mancari, 417 US 535, 555, 94 S.Ct. 2474, 2485, 41 L.Ed-2d 290 (1974); see also Ute Indian Tribe v. Probst, 428...