Nomination of an Associate Judge: Hearing Before the Committee on the District of Columbia, United States Senate, Ninety-fourth Congress, First Session, on Nomination of Charles W. Halleck to be an Associate Judge of the Superior Court of the District of Columbia (reappointment), December 3, 1975U.S. Government Printing Office, 1976 - 1069 páginas |
Otras ediciones - Ver todas
Términos y frases comunes
ADDIS ADDLESTONE Affirmed appellee arrest asked assault Assistant United Attorney's Office BANOUN BARCELLA bench BUSH calendar CHAIRMAN charged Charles Halleck Charles W clerk client Columbia Court Commission Committee continuance Court of Appeals courtroom D.C. App D.C. Code December defendant defense counsel dismissal District of Columbia EVANS fact felony Friday GILLMAN go to trial Goodwin Government Government's GRAFMAN GREENE guilty hearing Honor indicated Judge Halleck judicial justice lawyer matter MCNAMARA Michael Bridges motion to suppress nolle nolle prosequis offense Officer Daino person Pledger police officer proceedings PROPPER prosecutor prostitution question ready reappointment reason record Reversed Robert Harris rule S.Ct Senator MATHIAS sentence soliciting speedy trial statute STITT Street Superior Court supra talking tell testify testimony thing told transcript trial court trial judge U.S. Atty United States Attorney want of prosecution warrant Washington WITNESS
Pasajes populares
Página 803 - That the only purpose for which power can be rightfully exercised over any member of a civilized community, against his will, is to prevent harm to others.
Página 902 - Supplemental questions concerning specific statutory qualifications for service as a judge in the courts of the District of Columbia pursuant to the District of Columbia Court Reform and Criminal Procedure Act of 1970, DC Code Section 1 1 - 150 1 (b), as amended.
Página 803 - No right is held more sacred, or is more carefully guarded, by the common law, than the right of every individual to the possession and control of his own person, free from all restraint or interference of others, unless by clear and unquestionable authority of law.
Página 803 - The foregoing cases suggest that specific guarantees in the Bill of Rights have penumbras, formed by emanations from those guarantees that help give them life and substance.
Página 620 - We merely hold today that where a police officer observes unusual conduct which leads him reasonably to conclude in light of his experience that criminal activity may be afoot and that the persons with whom he is dealing may be armed and presently dangerous...
Página 607 - Though the law itself be fair on its face and impartial in appearance, yet, if it is applied and administered by public authority with an evil eye and an unequal hand, so as practically to make unjust and illegal discriminations between persons in similar circumstances, material to their rights, the denial of equal justice is still within the prohibition of the Constitution.
Página 231 - A judge should be patient, dignified, and courteous to litigants, jurors, witnesses, lawyers, and others with whom he deals in his official capacity, and should require similar conduct of lawyers, and of his staff, court officials, and others subject to his direction and control.
Página 578 - That government hires lawyers to prosecute and defendants who have the money hire lawyers to defend are the strongest indications of the widespread belief that lawyers in criminal courts are necessities, not luxuries. The right of one charged with crime to counsel may not be deemed fundamental and essential to fair trials in some countries, but it is in ours.
Página 704 - ... a clear and present danger of a serious substantive evil that rises far above public inconvenience, annoyance, or unrest.
Página 661 - The vagaries of eyewitness identification are wellknown; the annals of criminal law are rife with instances of mistaken identification.