Imágenes de páginas
PDF
EPUB
[blocks in formation]

Fitzgerald, Dr. Laurine E., associate dean of students and professor
of education, Michigan State University, "References Cited," a
reference list entitled_

510

Fact sheet on the earnings gap..

Prepared statement of___

[ocr errors]

"Fact Sheet on the American Family in Poverty," an article
entitled___

[blocks in formation]

Table 1.-Number of men and women graduating with honors
1961-1970___

336

[merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][ocr errors][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small]

Letter from Harry W. Linde, Ph. D., assistant professor, North-
western University, dated April 8, 1970..

Letter from Donald M. Pitcairn, M.D., director, Physician
Education Branch, HEW, dated November 10, 1969_.

"Medical Schools: HEW Funded Half of 68 Expenses,' an
article entitled__

"Medical Womanpower," an article entitled..

"Reasons for Petitions of the Alumnae Association,

[merged small][merged small][ocr errors][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small]

Study of U.S. medical school applicants, 1968-69 (table) -
"Studying Attitudes of the Medical Profession Towards Women
Physicians," a survey entitled__

574

559

Ross, Mrs. Jean, chairman, National Legislative Committee, American
Association of University Women:

"Rebelling Women-The Reason," an article from the U.S.
News & World Report.

[merged small][ocr errors][merged small][merged small][merged small]

Sandler, Dr. Bernice, chairman, Action Committee for Federal Con-
tract Compliance in Education, WEAL:

Dowding, Nancy E., Ph. D., president, Women's Equity Action
League, letter to Secretary Schultz, dated January 31, 1970____

"Equal Employment Opportunity Provisions Directly Related to

Education or Training," an article entitled_

308

Prepared statements, letters, supplemental material, etc.—Continued
Scott, Dr. Ann, University of Buffalo, National Organization for
Women:

"A Report from the Commission on the Status of Women in the
Profession," an article entitled.

Brat fisch, Virginia, president, California NOW, letter to chancellor
Glenn S. Dumke, Los Angeles, Calif., dated June 29, 1970,
enclosing analysis of the status of women at California State
College

Equal opportunities for men and women in New York State, a
review of the complaint record, 1965-69_

Page

169

202

161

"Preliminary Report on the Status of Women at Harvard,' an
article entitled_.

Platform on Women's Rights, New Democratic Coalition, New
York State, adopted March 10, 1970.

Grade changes in number of full-time librarians (table).
Letter from Robert J. Mangum, commissioner, Division of
Human Rights, State of New York, dated June 9, 1970.
Letter to Hon. Arthur A. Fletcher, Assistant Secretary of Labor,
dated June 17, 1970.

161

161

157

177

183

Sex discrimination guidelines..

Statement of..

"Why Doesn't Business Hire More College-Trained Women?"
reprint from Personnel Management-Policies and Practices,
April 1969

"Quotations and Incidents Heard and Observed Informally on
Campus-1966 on," an article entitled

"The Half-Eaten Apple," a newspaper article entitled.

200

148

209

212

174

"Women at Wisconsin," a booklet entitled_

190

"Women in the Labor Force," an article entitled_
"Women in the World of Work," an article entitled.

180

Letter to Chairman Green, dated July 13, 1970.
Statement of___

Shaw, Mrs. Daisy K., director, Educational and Vocational Guidance of New York City:

172

449

446

DISCRIMINATION AGAINST WOMEN

WEDNESDAY, JUNE 17, 1970

HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES,
SPECIAL SUBCOMMITTEE ON EDUCATION OF THE

COMMITTEE ON EDUCATION AND LABOR,

Washington, D.C. The subcommittee met at 10:20 a.m. in room 2261, Rayburn House Office Building, Hon. Edith Green (chairman of the subcommittee) presiding.

Present: Representatives Green, Hathaway, Perkins, Quie, and Steiger.

Staff members present: Harry Hogan, counsel; Robert C. Andringa, minority professional staff assistant.

(Text of section 805 of H.R. 16098 follows:)

PROHIBITION OF DISCRIMINATION

SEC. 805. (a) Section 601 of title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 is amended to read as follows:

"SEC. 601. No person in the United States shall, on the ground of race, color, sex, or national origin, be excluded from participation in, be denied the benefits of, or be subjected to discrimination under any program or activity receiving Federal financial assistance."

(b) Section 702 of title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 is amended by the insertion of a period after "activities" and the deletion of the remainder of the sentence.

(c) That paragraph (1) of subsection (a) of section 104 of the Civil Rights Act of 1957 (42 U.S.C. 1975c (a)) is amended by inserting immediately after "religion," the following: "sex", and paragraphs (2), (3), and (4) of subsection (a) of such section 104 are each amended by inserting immediately after "religion" the following: ", sex”.

(d) Section 13 (a) of the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 is amended by the insertion after the words "the provisions of section 6" of the following language "(except section 6(d) in the case of paragraph (1)).”

Mrs. GREEN. The subcommittee will come to order for the further consideration of legislation that is under the jurisdiction of this subcommittee.

It is with a great sense of personal pleasure that I welcome to the subcommittee today witnesses who will offer testimony on section 805 of H.R. 16098.

Section 805 would amend the Civil Rights Act to prohibit discrimination on the basis of sex in federally financed programs and would remove the exemption presently existing in title VII of the Civil Rights Act with respect to those in education. It would authorize the Civil Rights Commission to study discrimination against women and lastly would remove the exemption of executive, administrative, and professional employees from the equal pay for equal work provision of the Fair Labor Standards Act.

(1)

It is to be hoped that the enactment of the provisions would be of some help in eliminating the discrimination against women which still permeates our society.

It seems ironic that in a period when we are more concerned with civil rights and liberties than ever before in our history-when minorities have vigorously asserted themselves-that discrimination against a very important majority-women-has been given little attention. Increasingly women are constituting a greater proportion of our labor force. As of April of this year there were 31,293,000 women in the labor market constituting nearly 40 percent of the total.

However, despite the growth in the number of women working today, the proportion of women in the professions is lower in this country than in most countries throughout the world.

While the United States prides itself in being a leader of nations, it has been backward in its treatment of its working women.

Professionally, women in the United States constitute only 9 percent of all full professors, 8 percent of all scientists, 6.7 percent of all physicians, 3.5 percent of all lawyers, and 1 percent of all engineers.

Despite the fact that the Federal Government through Democratic and Republican administrations has given lip service to the equal opportunities for employment of women, the very large majority are in the lower grades of Civil Service and only a small portion in policymaking or administrative positions.

Despite increases in earnings, income and wage statistics illustrate dramatically a deep discrimination against women. The average median income for women working full-time year around is $4,457. The comparable figure for men is $7,664.

We have been concerned, and rightly so, about discrimination against the Negro in our society-about the Negro man who averages $5,603-only 69.9 percent of the average earnings for a white man.

But I hear little concern expressed for women who average only 58 percent in comparison. The average wage in the United States is: Negro women, $3,677; white women, $4,700; Negro men, $5,603; white men, $8,014.

The sorry fact is also that the gap in earning power is widening. In 1956, for example, women's median income of $2,827 was 64 percent of the $4,466 received by men.

Women's median wage or salary income rose to $3,973 in 1966 while men's rose to $6,848. So, although both groups experienced increases. women's income increased at a slower rate and their median income in 1966 was only 58 percent of that of men-a 6-percent drop in the 10year period.

Many of us would like to think of educational institutions as being far from the maddening crowd, where fair play is the rule of the game and everyone, including women, gets a fair roll of the dice.

Let us not deceive ourselves-our educational institutions have proven to be no bastions of democracy.

Initially many women are required to meet higher admission standards than men. While the Federal Government and the Office of Education, in effect, though their policies, encourage college admission standards to be waived for certain individuals, they have shown ab

« AnteriorContinuar »