Imágenes de páginas
PDF
EPUB

21

1

SEC. 12. It is the intent of Congress, in the exercise of

2 its plenary power over Indian affairs and on behalf of the

3 United States as the guardian and trustee for the Navajo and 4 Hopi Tribes, that

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

(1) the lands transferred pursuant to section 6 of this Act and the revenue interests transferred pursuant to section 7 of this Act shall be a good faith effort to replace the value of the lands taken from the Hopi Tribe pursuant to section 4 and the extinguishment of claims pursuant to section 8;

(2) the lands transferred to the Hopi Tribe pursu

ant to section 5 of this Act shall be a good faith effort to settle any interest the Hopi Tribe may have in the Navajo Indian Reservation pursuant to the 1934 Act;

(3) the lands transferred to the Navajo Tribe by section 4 of this Act, which will result in a substantial decrease in the numbers of Navajo families who will be

required to relocate, is adequate consideration for the

transfer of Navajo lands and revenue interests to the Hopi Tribe; and

(4) that the resolution to be adopted by the Navajo Tribe pursuant to section 3 of this Act shall constitute the consent of the Navajo Tribe to the transfer of its interests to the Hopi Tribe pursuant to this

Act.

HR 4281 IH1S

22

1 SEC. 13. (a) Subsection (f) of section 10 and the last 2 sentence of section 23 of the 1974 Act are hereby repealed. 3 (b) Except as repealed by this Act or as inconsistent 4 with the provisions of this Act, all provisions of the 1974 Act 5 as amended, shall remain in full force and effect.

HR 4281 IH1S

BACKGROUND: H.R.4281

1) The 1882 Executive Order Reservation

In the 1870's, the BIA agents in Northern Arizona complained to Washington that the Hopi Tribe needed to have a reservation in order to be protected from white intermeddlers, Mormor settlers and encroaching Navajos. As a result, in 1882, President Chester Arthur by Executive Order, established a reservation for "the Hopi Indians and such other Indians as the Secretary of the Interior may see fit to settle thereon". That reservation, which was about 70 miles long and 55 miles wide, consisted of approximately 2.5 million acres ir. Northern Arizona.

At that time, the Navajo tribe, which consisted of about 13,000 members, had a reservation which was to the east and adjacent to the Hopi reservation. Evidence shows that ever then, about 300 Navajos were living inside the 1882 reservation. Hopi Tribe at that time had a total population of about 1800 people.

The

In spite of the creation of a reservation for the Hopis, Navajos continued to move into the Hopi reservation. In 1943, the Secretary of the Interior established Land Management Districts and limited the Hopis to one area known as District Six while assigning the rest of the 1882 reservation to the Navajos. District six, which consists of about 600,000 acres, is only about one fourth the size of the original 1882 Reservation.

2) The 1958 Act and Healing v.Jores

The respective rights of the two tribes to the 1882 reservation remained undetermined until 1958 when Congress passed an Act which confirmed the rights of the tribes to the area and authorized the two tribes to litigate their respective rights to

the reservation.

-2

(P.L. 85-547, 72 Stat. 403).

The tribes went to court and in the case of Healing v. Jones 210 F.Supp 125, (1962) a three judge Federal court ruled that while District Six belonged exclusively to the Hopis, the rest of the 1882 reservation belonged jointly to both the Navajo and Hopi tribes because the Secretary of the Interior in assigning grazing districts to the Navajos in 1943 had exercised his option under the 1882 Executive Order to settle such other Indians as he may see fit in the 1882 reservation. This 1962 decision was summarily upheld by the Supreme Court in 1963. (See Healing v. Jones, 373 U.S 758). Beginning in 1963, the two tribes attempted without success to negotiate a settlement which would conform to the Court's decision in Healing v. Jones. By 1970 however, failure to reach any negotiated settlement moved the Hopis to petition the Federal court for an order of compliance to enforce their rights under the Healing decree. In 1974, in the case of Hamilton v. Macdonald, 503 F 2d 1138, a Federal Circuit Court recognized the right of the Hopis to share a joint, undivided and equal interest in the Joint Use Area (the area of the 1882 reservation owned by both tribes). Since the court was not authorized to partition the area, it attempted to enforce the rights of the Hopis by imposing a reduction of Navajo livestock, a limitation on Navajo grazing area and a restriction on further Navajo construction in the area.

3) P.L. 93-531

Before the court's order could be implemented, Congress took the initiative and enacted P.L.93-531. This Act provided that unless a mediator and the two tribes could arrive to a negotiated settlement, a partition of the Joint Use Area would be done by a

-3

Federal court. Under P.L.93-531, the area would be partitioned equally between the two tribes with each tribe receiving about 900,000 acres. Mediation failed and the Federal court established the line of partition on February 10, 1977. The Court order became final on April 18, 1979.

Congress, in 1974, was aware that a partition of the area

would result in some Navajos being located on the Hopi side of the partition and some Hopis being located on the Navajo side of the partition. Since under Federal law, Indians from one tribe do not have a legal right to remain or another tribe's reservation, the Navajos and Hopis who ended or the wrong side of the partition would be subject to eviction.

In order to assist such Navajos and

Hopis to relocate outside of the contested area, Congress in P.L. 93-531, created the navajo-Hopi Relocation. Commission as an independant agency within the Interior Department. The task of the Commission was to assist members of both tribes to relocate outside each other's area by providing each household with a new or replacement home as well as moving expenses and additional

incentive payments.

4) The July 7, 1986 deadline.

P.L. 93-531 provides that within 24 months after the date of the District court's order finalizing the partition line, the Commission had to prepare and submit to Congress a relocation. Plan. The Report and Plan was given to Congress or. April 8, 1981 and became effective 90 days thereafter. Under the Act, a five year period of planned relocation from the former Joint Use Area then began and has to be completed by July 7, 1986. (After that date, the Hopi Tribe could proceed to evict any remaining Navajos

« AnteriorContinuar »