Survey of consolidated claim embracing
several contiguous lode locations allowed.. 362
Additional proof allowed though the dis-
covery and improvements appeared to be on
land excluded from the claim
Failure to assert an alleged right in the
courts, on due opportunity, debars its con-
sideration when set up by an assignee who
is not an "adverse claimant."
Dismissal of suit by adverse claimant held
a waiver of claim to ground in conflict,
where the lode passed through the prior
placer claim
Protest or adverse claim should be filed as
against an application to protect rights un-
der a prior townsite patent..
Claimant for alleged known lode should
apply for patent, though such lode is in-
cluded in placer patent issued to another.. 491
The right to determine questions of pos
session in the courts necessarily involves
all matters incidental thereto
MILLSITE.
Location on non-mineral land, not contigu-
ous to lode, protected from subsequent town
site appropriation...........
Application not limited to single loca-
Though the application cover several lo-
cations, proof of $500 expended on the claim,
as applied for, is sufficient...............221, 374
Where application covers several loca-
tions, an adverse claimant may show aban.
donment of any one of such locations
Preliminary showing of expenditure neces-
sary to maintain possession required on ap-
plication....
....221, 374
How proof of annual expenditure should
be shown.....
........221, 374