Reports of Cases Ruled and Adjudged in the Several Courts of the United States, and of Pennsylvania: Held at the Seat of the Federal Government, Volumen92 |
Dentro del libro
Resultados 1-5 de 53
Página 109
... the plaintiff , a patentee , had licensed the defendant to manufacture the article
covered by the patent . After having done so , he refused to pay the royalty . The
patentee sued him . He pleaded “ that the letters - patent were void , and that he ...
... the plaintiff , a patentee , had licensed the defendant to manufacture the article
covered by the patent . After having done so , he refused to pay the royalty . The
patentee sued him . He pleaded “ that the letters - patent were void , and that he ...
Página 319
... power to grant the fee , as it did by the joint resolution of March 2 , 1867 , to
plaintiff . It is certainly true that the joint resolution of March 2 , and the patent
issued under it to plaintiff , cover geographically the land in controversy ; and
Frisbie v .
... power to grant the fee , as it did by the joint resolution of March 2 , 1867 , to
plaintiff . It is certainly true that the joint resolution of March 2 , and the patent
issued under it to plaintiff , cover geographically the land in controversy ; and
Frisbie v .
Página 320
The other proposition to which plaintiff excepted declares that plaintiff had title to
all the land covered by the joint resolution of March 2 , 1867 , and by the patent ,
except that claimed by defendant under the joint resolution of July 26 , 1866 .
The other proposition to which plaintiff excepted declares that plaintiff had title to
all the land covered by the joint resolution of March 2 , 1867 , and by the patent ,
except that claimed by defendant under the joint resolution of July 26 , 1866 .
Página 327
Scott brought this action against Brown & Stone , in the Supreme Court of
Rensselaer County , New York , alleging in his complaint that one Neer was the
owner of a patent for a certain improvement in fire - places and stoves ; that Neer
had ...
Scott brought this action against Brown & Stone , in the Supreme Court of
Rensselaer County , New York , alleging in his complaint that one Neer was the
owner of a patent for a certain improvement in fire - places and stoves ; that Neer
had ...
Página 328
No other question was made before the referee as to the effect of the patent laws
upon the rights of the parties . Numerous exceptions were taken to the report ; but
not one of them presented directly any question under these laws . The ruling ...
No other question was made before the referee as to the effect of the patent laws
upon the rights of the parties . Numerous exceptions were taken to the report ; but
not one of them presented directly any question under these laws . The ruling ...
Comentarios de la gente - Escribir un comentario
No encontramos ningún comentario en los lugares habituales.
Otras ediciones - Ver todas
Términos y frases comunes
action agent alleged amendment amount answer appears applied assessed authority bank bill bonds brought cause charge Circuit Court citizens claim commissioners complainant condition Congress consideration Constitution construction contract corporation debt decided decision decree defendant delivered determine direct District duty effect election entitled equally equity error evidence executed exercise existence fact filed follows give given grant held intended interest issued judgment jurisdiction JUSTICE lands legislature limits March matter means ment necessary notes objection offer officers opinion original paid parties passed patent payment perform person plaintiff port possession present proceedings purchase question Railroad Company reason received record referred respect road rule sect secured sold statute sufficient suit survey taken thing tion town township United valid vessel vote Wall York
Información bibliográfica
| Título | Reports of Cases Ruled and Adjudged in the Several Courts of the United States, and of Pennsylvania: Held at the Seat of the Federal Government, Volumen92 |
| Autor | Alexander James Dallas |
| Colaborador | United States. Supreme Court |
| Editor | reporter at the Aurora Office, 1876 |
| Procedencia del original | Universidad de Harvard |
| Digitalizado | 26 Jul. 2007 |
| Exportar cita | BiBTeX EndNote RefMan |