...richness of their vocabulary surpasses, on many points, that of the classical writers of any period. Dialects have always been the feeders rather than...eminence which is the result of literary cultivation. What Grimm says of the origin of dialects in general applies only to such as are produced by phonetic...

...richness of their vocabulary surpasses, on many points, that of the classical writers of any period. Dialects have always been the feeders rather than...eminence which is the result of literary cultivation. What Griinm says of the origin of dialects in general applies only to such as are produced by phonetic...

...richness of their vocabulary surpasses, on many points, that of the classical writers of any period. Dialects have always been the feeders rather than...eminence which is the result of literary cultivation. What Grimm says of the origin of dialects ingeneral applies only to such as are produced by phonetic...

...amid unimportant differences. It may be admitted that “dialects have always been the feeders ratimer than the channels of a literary language; anyhow they are parallel streams, which existed long betore omme of them was raised to that temporary eminence which is the result of literary cultivation.”...

...not within our present limits. In the chapter on " Dialectic Regeneration" Professor Miiller says, " Dialects have always been the feeders rather than...eminence which is the result of literary cultivation Before there is a national language, there have always been hundreds of dialects in districts, towns,...

...richness of their vocabulary Surpasses, on many points, that of the classical writers of any period. Dialects have always been the feeders rather than...eminence which is the result of literary cultivation. What Grimm says of the origin of dialects in ; «lierai applies only to such as are produced by |ilinnctic...

...richness of their vocabulary surpasses on many points that of the classical writers of any period. Dialects have always been the feeders, rather than the channels, of a literary language; they are parallel streams, which existed long before one of them was raised to that temporary eminence...

...richness of their vocabulary surpasses in many points that of the classical writers of any period. Dialects have always been the feeders rather than the channels of a literary language." Speaking of the Sanskrit, Greek, Latin, and Gothic, he says: " No doubt these are the royal heads in...

...richness of their vocabulary surpasses, on many points, that of the classical writers of any period. Dialects have always been the feeders rather than...eminence which is the result of literary cultivation. What Grimm says of the origin of dialects in general applies only to such as are produced by phonetic...

...common to the class, and lets drop the special and unimportant differences. It may be admitted that "dialects have always been the feeders rather than...eminence which is the result of literary cultivation." But that " dialectical regeneration" is no process of growth to be markedly distinguished from " phonetic...