Imágenes de páginas
PDF
EPUB

country the greatest country in the world and the freest of all nations.

With that, we will recess until further notice.

Thank you all for being here. [Applause.]

[Whereupon, at 1:42 p.m., the subcommittee adjourned, subject to

the call of the Chair.]

APPENDIX

ADDITIONAL SUBMISSIONS FOR THE RECORD

SUPPLEMENTAL SUBMISSIONS OF SUN MYUNG MOON

Casey Scott & Canfield, P. C.
Attorneys at Law

August 13, 1984

420 Washington Building 1435 G Street, N. W Washington, D. C. 20005

(202) 783-6490

Honorable Orrin G. Hatch

Subcommittee on the Constitution

Committee on the Judiciary

of the Senate of the United States Russell Building

Suite 135

United States Senate

Washington, D.C.

Dear Mr. Chairman:

The enclosed analysis of the record of the trial of Reverend Sun Myung Moon is submitted on behalf of the Unification Church of America in order to address various issues raised during the June 26, 1984, hearings of the Subcommittee concerning Religious Liberty in the United States.

Recently, it has been suggested that Reverend Moon's testimony at your hearing "totally misstated what was involved in the prosecution." We believe that the enclosed memorandum presents a fair and objective description of what happened in Reverend Moon's prosecution, using quotations from seven thousand pages of trial transcripts.

We appreciate this opportunity to contribute to consideration of an issue most important to the majority of Americans -- religious freedom under the U.S. Constitution. We also are thankful for the very helpful and thoughtful consideration extended by your staff.

Sincerely,

Edward F.

Edward F. Canfield

Canfield

EFC:rlw
Enclosure

CC:

Dee Benson, Esq.
Special Counsel

Oversight Hearing on Religious Liberty
Before the Subcommittee on the Constitution
United States Senate Committee on the Judiciary

[blocks in formation]
[blocks in formation]

B.

Reverend Moon Was Investigated, Not
Simply As a Taxpayer, But Because He
Was the Head of the Unification
Church

The Highly Prejudicial Publicity
Surrounding the Unification Church and
Reverend Moon Precluded Any Possibility
That a Panel of Jurors Free From Bias
or Prejudice Could be Selected . . . . .

[blocks in formation]
[blocks in formation]

8

1

3

C.

CONCLUSION

The Government's Prosecution of This
Case on the Basis of Whether the Unifi-
cation Church Was a True Religion, Deprived
Reverend Moon of the Opportunity For a
Fair Trial

1.

The Government Consistently
Portrayed the Unification Church as
a Mere Business, and Reverend Moon
as a Businessman, in its Presentation
to the Jury

39

41

[blocks in formation]
« AnteriorContinuar »