Imágenes de páginas
PDF
EPUB

pected increase of the majority was regarded as an indication that the proposal to disestablish the Irish Church was gaining ground in the country.

On the announcement of the numbers, Mr. Disraeli said that the vote had altered the relations of the Government with the House, and it would consequently be necessary that they should consider their position. He therefore proposed that the House should adjourn until the following Monday, which was agreed to.

founded on the dominant rights of the few the Government of sixty-five. The unexover the many, and shall not stand. You call it a Missionary Church; if so, its mission is unfulfilled-it has failed utterly. Like some exotic brought from a far country with infinite pains and useless trouble, it is kept alive with difficulty and expense in an ungrateful climate and ungenial soil. The curse of barrenness is upon it; it has no leaves, it bears no blossoms, it yields no fruit. Cut it down; why cumbereth it the ground? Mr. Henley, General Peel, Sir Stafford Northcote, Lord Mayo, and Mr. Disraeli argued vigorously on the other side of the question, but they were seriously hampered by the ambiguous character of the amendment which they supported, and were obliged to have recourse to the expedient of attacking the policy of the Liberal party rather than of vindicating their own. Mr. Disraeli accused Mr. Gladstone of appearing as the representative of the High Church Ritualists and the Irish Romanists, who had long been in secret combination and were now in open confederacy for the destruction of the union between Church and State. At the close of the fourth night of this memorable debate Lord Stanley's amendment was rejected by a majority of sixty (270 to 330), and Mr. Gladstone's motion, that the House should go into committee, was carried by 328 votes to 272-a majority of fifty-six.

On the day named (May 4th) the Prime Minister stated, in the presence of a crowded House, that he had waited upon the Queen, and, with the full concurrence of his colleagues, had advised Her Majesty to dissolve Parliament, and had at the same time intimated to her that if she was of opinion that the question at issue could be more satisfactorily settled, and the interests of the country better promoted by the immediate retirement of the present Government, they were prepared to quit her service. He had then tendered his resignation. After taking a day for consideration, the Queen had declined to accept the resignation of her Ministers, and had signified her readiness to dissolve Parliament as soon as the state of public business would permit. Under these circumstances he had advised Her Majesty to appeal to the new constituencies; and if the House would cordially co-operate with the Government in expediting public business a dissolution might take place in the course of the autumn.

The Easter holidays had now arrived, and afforded an opportunity to both parties to hold public meetings and to appeal to the country for support to their respective views. A deep interest was taken in the While the British Parliament were ensettlement of the question at issue, but the gaged in the discussion of these domestic agitation was of the most orderly and questions, information was received of the peaceful kind. The two Houses met again success of the expedition sent to recover the after the Easter recess on the 20th of April, Abyssinian captives. It was despatched from and it was agreed that the Commons should Bombay, under the command of Sir Robert resume consideration of Mr. Gladstone's Napier, an Indian officer of great experiresolutions on the 27th. After a debate, ence and high reputation. The captives, extending over three nights, the House some of whom had been four years in divided on the first resolution on Friday confinement, consisted of Consul Cameron, morning, the 30th of April, when 330 voted Mr. Rassam, who had been assistant British for and 265 against it a majority against | Resident at Aden, Lieutenant Prideaux,

[ocr errors]

and Dr. Blanc, who had accompanied him of making an assault on his almost inacceson his mission, and were employed on offi- sible stronghold. Magdala was situated cial business when they were seized and upon an isolated rock, rising many hundred imprisoned. There were also among the feet above the plain, protected by lofty captives a number of German missionaries, and almost overhanging cliffs, so prewith their wives and children, and some teachers, artists, and workmen. The savage ruler treated them in the most capricious manner at one time chaining them twoand-two, and threatening them with death; at another, coming into their prison half dressed, and bringing with him a bottle of wine, which he made them share with him. As he obstinately refused to set his prisoners at liberty, it was deemed absolutely necessary to send a force to compel their release.

Theodore was early made aware of the disembarkation of the British troops, but he boasted that he was prepared to meet them, and he seems at times to have fancied that he would be able to hold his fortress at Magdala against their assaults. The march of an army over the rocky highlands of Abyssinia would have been impracticable in the face of a brave and active enemy; but in their progress through deep ravines and over high hills the British forces met with no opposition whatever. In the beginning of April, 1868, after traversing 400 miles of mountainous and difficult country, often under a tropical sun, or amid storms of rain and sleet, they appeared before Magdala. An encounter took place beween them and Theodore's army at some distance from the fortress. The Abyssinians behaved with great spirit and courage, and made repeated desperate charges upon their enemies, which, however, were easily repulsed. They had 500 men killed and a much larger number wounded. The British did not lose a single man, and had only nineteen wounded.

Next morning Theodore sent Lieutenant Prideaux and Mr. Flad with a flag of truce to offer terms. The captives were set free and sent into the camp, but Theodore refused to surrender. The British commander was therefore under the necessity

cipitous that a cat could not climb them except at two points-north and south-at each of which a steep narrow path leads up to a strong gateway. Shot, shell, and rockets made no impression upon the gateway, which was protected by a strong stockade. But the assailants forced their way up the ascent in spite of the obstacles they had to encounter, and carried the stockade, which was defended by Theodore in person with a small band of faithful followers, the rest of his army having abandoned the place. On entering the fortress they found the dead body of Theodore a short way from the gate. Finding further resistance hopeless, he shot himself with a pistol before our soldiers reached the place where he stood. They found in the fortress upwards of thirty pieces of artillery, many of great weight, with ample stores of ammunition.

In order that the fortress should not fall into the hands of a fierce Mahommedan tribe, the hereditary enemies of the Christians, Sir Robert Napier resolved to destroy it. He therefore set it on fire, and, to use his own expression, of Magdala, 'nothing but blackened rock remains.' In a letter addressed to the Secretary of State, the General thus sums up the results of the campaign: 'The province of Tigre, which we found just struggling into independence, has been somewhat strengthened and settled by us. Gobaze, an Abyssinian chief who had shown himself friendly to the expedition, and at the date of our arrival was attempting a hopeless opposition to Theodore, should now be able to establish his position. Theodore had acquired by conquest a sovereignty which he knew only how to abuse. He was not strong enough to protect the people from other oppressors, while yet able to carry plunder and cruelty into every district he himself might visit.

I fail to discover a single point of view | in 1810 it soon became apparent that very from which it is possible to regard his removal with regret.'

After the destruction of Magdala the expedition set out on its return, and the first detachment of troops arrived at Portsmouth on the 21st of June. The enterprise was skilfully planned and most effectively conducted from its commencement to its close. The thanks of both Houses of Parliament were voted to the troops employed in the expedition, and to their General, who was elevated to the peerage as Baron Napier of Magdala, and rewarded with a pension. The cost of the expedition amounted to upwards of £9,000,000 sterling. Loud complaints were made that the fact of its enormous expense was carefully concealed from the public until after the general election.

While the House of Commons was engaged in the consideration of Mr. Gladstone's resolutions the news was received of the death of Lord Brougham at Cannes, on the 7th of May, in the ninetieth year of his age. It attracted little notice, but thirty years before the demise of no other public man would have excited so much attention. From the time of his admission to the Scottish bar at the close of last century onwards, Henry Brougham was regarded as a person of gigantic abilities and extraordinary attainments. He was one of the founders of the Edinburgh Review. Sydney Smith, to whom the honour of the first suggestion of this celebrated periodical is due, 'had so strong an impression,' Jeffrey says, 'of Brougham's indiscretion and rashness, that he would not let him be a member of our association, though wished for by all the rest. He was admitted, however, after the third number, and did more work for us than anybody.' Brougham, indeed, continued for more than forty years to be one of the principal contributors to the work; and his articles, though not always judicious, were characterized by great ability, and contributed largely to the celebrity and success of the Whig organ. When he entered Parliament

He

few politicians ever brought to the business of practical politics a larger acquaintance with everything relating to the history and prospects of the human race. He devoted himself heart and soul to the cause of civil and religious liberty, and directed the thunders of his eloquence against such gross and glaring evils as colonial slavery, Orders in Council, flogging in the army, Roman Catholic disabilities, and the perversion of public charities. He was especially zealous in the cause of education and of parliamentary reform, and his eloquent advocacy of these and other kindred causes contributed greatly to their success. has been justly termed the hundred-handed Briareus of his party. There was nothing he did not touch, and with powerful effect. His industry was stupendous, it seemed impossible to exhaust his unwearied exertions in whatever he undertook. Apart from his labours in Parliament and in his own profession, which would have fully occupied the time of most men, Brougham found leisure to establish schools and write lectures for them, to superintend the composition and publication of books of popular science, to write articles for the Edinburgh Review and pamphlets, to compose treatises on refraction, on the integral calculus, on natural theology, on chemistry, on the objects, advantages, and pleasures of science, on the eloquence of the ancients, on colonial policy, on the state of the nation, on education, on the statesmen of the time of George III., and indeed on an endless succession of subjects. His intellect was quick, powerful, and brilliant, rather than sound; and his judgment was often warped by his prejudices and feelings. His eloquence was of a very high, though not of the highest order, and his natural talent for sarcasm made him a most formidable opponent in the House or at the Bar. His sustained flights of indignant or argumentative declamation-as in his defence of Queen Caroline, and in the case of Mr. Williams, tried for libel on the Durham

On and passed a good deal of his time in Cannes, where he died and was buried.

clergy-have rarely been equalled. rolled the stream of his eloquence, strong from conviction, vehement from passion, and burning with invective as the occasion demanded.' His moral qualities were unfortunately not equal to his intellectual powers. He was self-willed and imperious, with an irresistible passion for domineering and impatience of contradiction, and was habitually and notoriously actuated by ungenerous jealousy of every rival. One who knew him well affirmed that there never was a direct personal rival, or one who was in a position which, however reluctantly, implied rivalry, to whom he was just, and his envy often led to implacable hostility. Had it not been for his moral failings,' says Lord Cockburn, 'Brougham, inferior to no modern statesman in eloquence, and superior to them all in knowledge, enlightened views, industry, and fire, would have been the greatest inan in civil affairs of this age; but neither genius nor oratory, even when worthily exerted, can command their natural influence when combined with habits which create enemies hourly, or when exposed to the imputation of heartlessness or insincerity. Accordingly, with all his powers and celebrity, Brougham has never been at the head, as its trusted leader, of any party. He has compelled all the world to admire, and most of it to fear him, and for many years he has guided this nation in the formation of sound views throughout that revolution of opinion which has agitated men during his day, and has always been above the paltriness of pecuniary temptation, and his fidelity to his principles and party was never impeached till lately; yet he has never had any following of the heart, his very eloquence has often suffered from its disclosing insincerity, and this generally in passages which obtained and deserved the loudest applause.'

For a number of years before his death the once powerful and admired orator and statesman had passed almost out of sight. He ceased to take any part in public affairs,

The procedure adopted by the Government, in retaining office after they had been defeated by large majorities in the House of Commons, was severely condemned by a number of members on the Liberal side of the House, who denounced it as unconstitutional, and as an expedient to induce the House to give a two months' lease to a Government which they neither frusted nor were trusted by. They were prevented, however, from taking any active steps to eject the Government from office by their knowledge that Mr. Disraeli would in that case immediately dissolve the Parliament and appeal to the existing constituencies; and that, whatever might be their response, a second dissolution would necessarily require to be made in the following year, when the new Reform Bill came into operation. The Ministry, therefore, though in a considerable minority, were allowed to retain their places till the new election. Mr. Gladstone's two remaining resolutions, however, were put to the House and adopted, the Government declining to divide against them. A suspensory Bill was subsequently brought in by Mr. Gladstone, and carried in the House of Commons without much opposition, and in the Upper House by a majority of 192 votes to 97. By this measure the exercise of the Crown patronage in connection with the Irish Church, pending the disestablishment proposal, was in the meantime suspended, so that no new life interests could be created in connection with that body.

The Scottish and Irish Reform Bills were pushed forward as rapidly as possible. The Government underwent several mortifying defeats in connection with the former, and when the ratepaying clause was struck out another ministerial crisis took place, which, however, like the others, passed over very easily. The Bribery Bill decided that the jurisdiction of the House over cases of this sort should be transferred to the judges. The Boundary Bill and the Registration

Bill, which it was necessary to pass before | church not for the Irish.' 'The Church of an appeal to the new constituencies could Ireland,' he added, 'costs as much for the properly take place, were pressed through police and soldiers as for the clergy themboth Houses and became law. A Bill was selves. Do we imitate the Saviour or the also carried to authorize the Government Arabian impostor when we carry the Bible to purchase the electric telegraphs from the in the one hand and the sword in the other?' various private companies to which they Count Cavour, with all his admiration of belonged, and to combine them into one British institutions, was constrained to say great national system. The Government that the State Church in Ireland 'remains. made a rather unfavourable bargain, but the to the Catholics a representative of the arrangement has in the end been advan- cause of their miseries, a sign of defeat tageous to the country. On the last day of and oppression. It exasperates their sufJuly the Parliament was prorogued with a ferings, and makes their humiliation more view to its dissolution, and the proclamation| keenly felt.' declaring that it was dissolved was issued on the 11th of November, 1868.

[ocr errors]

The Irish Church, the fate of which was to be determined by the impending election, was an institution without precedent or parallel in the history of Europe. Sydney Smith, indeed, went further, and saidThere is no abuse like it in all Europe, in all Asia, in all the discovered parts of Africa, and in all we have heard of Timbuctoo.' It had long been a stone of stumbling and a rock of offence' to all unprejudiced and judicious men. A succession of Irish viceroys had earnestly recommended its reduction, and declared that it weakened instead of strengthening the connection between Great Britain and Ireland. Lord Brougham regarded 'the great abuse of the Irish Established Church as the master evil, the source of perennial discord.' One of his successors on the woolsack said, 'the Irish Church was at the bottom of all the unhappiness which Ireland suffered;' and another of them said he believed the Protestant Church in Ireland to be one of the most mischievous institutions in existence.' Earl Grey 'believed the Church of Ireland to be the main source of all that misery and oppression under which the Irish, for nearly three centuries, had suffered;' and Lord Lytton, Colonial Secretary in Lord Derby's Administration, said he considered the words "Irish Church" to be the greatest bull in the language. It was called the Irish Church because it was a

This alien church,' as it was termed, was obnoxious to the people of Ireland, not only on account of its origin and the restriction of its benefits to a small minority of the nation, but owing to the character of its clergy, who for more than two centuries were, as a body, scandalously negligent in the discharge of their duties. It was no uncommon thing for a cluster of parishes to be formed into a single benefice for the behoof of a man who contented himself with levying the tithes and spending them at Cheltenham, or on the shores of the Mediterranean, doing no duty whatever in any of his parishes, and not even appointing a curate to officiate in his absence. Dean Swift described the Irish prelates as men sunk in indolence, whose chief business it was to bow and job at the Castle. The only spiritual function, he says, which they performed was ordination, and when he saw what persons they ordained, he doubted whether it would not be better that they should neglect that function as they neglected every other. It is scarcely possible, indeed, to speak in too strong terms of the character and conduct of the men who, down to the close of last century, were appointed by the Government to the Sees, cathedral offices, and the best livings. in the Irish Church. Swift, in bitter irony, says that no doubt the English Ministers nominated excellent men to the bishoprics of Ireland, but unhappily they were waylaid and murdered by highwaymen on their

« AnteriorContinuar »