« AnteriorContinuar »
The Plumb Plan for the Control of | No. 13.
Proof of Suicide in Action on In-
The Amendatory Power Under the
Constitution, particularly With Ref-
No. 3. Is Congress Obstructing Reform in
The Evolution of Property Rights.
Change of Rates of Public Utility | No. 15. What is a Common Law Marriage?
By C. J. Ramage, 263.
ment Which Must be Defined -"Con.
No. 5. Railroad Legislation as Developed
Power" Will the Supreme Court
No. 6. Right of State to Regulate Distri.
Interpretation. By Donald Mackay,
No. 7. The Next Step in the National Con-
sion" in the War as Told by a Lawyer.
No. 8. The Distinction Between Collateral
No. 19. The Law's Delays and Proposed
tution is Not a Justiciable Question.
No. 21. Applicability of the Interstate Com-
Products Into Other States? By Fred
tional Terms.--"Intoxicating Liquors.”
Is a Covenant Against Assignment | No. 25. What is a Highway--A Discussion
of English Decisions. By Donald
By George Urquhart, 213.
Sufficiency of Service of Notice to
Vacate by Landlord. By C. P. Berry
This list includes only those cases commented upon editorially or in our Notes of Important
tact With Live Trolley Wire, R. D. 314.
Columbus Ry., P. & L. Co. v. City of Columbus
(U. S. S. C.), Right of Public Service Com-
pany to be Released from Service Con-
Evans v. National Bank of Georgia (U. S. S.
C.), National Bank May Discount Notes at
Canadian Northern Ry. Co. v. Eggen (U. S.
S. C.), Are Non-Residents Entitled to Ex-
Residents, R. D. 441.
C.), Making the Jury Judge of the Law and
Fisher v. McNeely (Wash.), Suits Against Ex-
ecutors for Their Negligence in Handling
Decedent's Property, R. D. 387.
force Agreements Testamentary in Char.
acter, R. D. 280.
(Ala.), Right of Private Individual to
Foulke v. New York Consolidated Railway Co. | King v. City of Owensboro (Ky.), Criminal
Law-Coercion of Husband, ann. case, 287.
| Kornegay v. Price (N. C.), Right of Husband
to Acquire Property by Adverse Possession
as Against His Wife, R. D. 57.
Kuhn v. Ohio Loan & Trust Co. (Ohio), Mort-
gages-Future Advances, ann. case, 411.
Hammerschlag Mfg. Co. v. Importers and Trad-
ers National Bank (U. S. C. C. A.). Liabil- | Los Angeles Inv. Co. v. Gary et ux. (Cal.). Deeds
-Condition Subsequent, ann. case, 232.
Louisville & Nashville Ry Co. v. Harper (Ala.),
Hancock v. Davis, et al. (N. C.), Husband and
Wife--Adverse Possession, ann. case, 342. | Louisville & Nashville Ry, Co. v. Tally (Ala.),
Is the Judgment of a Federal Court a Do-
mestic Judgment, R. D. 152.
Hoefeld v. Ozello (Ill.), Is a Lease to Saloon
of Tax on Incomes from Securities Held in
Trust Outside the State, Ed. 439.
Mauney v. Millar (Ark.), Libel and Slander-
Privilege, ann. case, 447.
Maxwell v. Springfield Fire Ins. Co. (Ind.), Mak-
Conveyances—Bulk Sales Act, ann, case, 27.
| McAleenan V. Massachusetts Bonding Company
(N. Y.), Insurance-Failure to Take Appeal,
ann. case, 306.
Need for Codification, Ed. 386.
Mogle v. A. W. Scott et al. (Minn.), Master and
In re Dressler Producing Corporation (U. S. C.
Mueller v. Klingman (Ind.), Assault and In-
In re Grilli (N. Y.), Are Women by Reason of
Where There Has Been Material Misrepre-
sentation, R. D. 352.
Josevig-Kennecott Copper Co. v. Howarth Co. Ohio & Colorado Smelting Co, v. Public Utili-
(U. S. C. C. A.), Is Losing Party in a Case ties Commission (Col.), Right of Public