Imágenes de páginas
PDF
EPUB
[blocks in formation]
[blocks in formation]
[blocks in formation]

United States v. California & O.
Land Co. (C. C. A.)........
United States v. Case (D. C.)...
United States v. Central Pac. R.
Co. (C. C.).....

United States v. Don On (C. C.)..
United States v. Durwood (D. C.)..
United States v. Ebbs (D. C.).. . ..
United States v. Eqe (D. C.).
United States v. Fowkes (D. C.)..
United States v. Ingraham (C. C.)..
United States v. Insley (C. C.)....
United States v. Loeb (C. C.)....
United States v. Lynch (D. C.)...
United States v. Southern Pac. R.
Co. (C. C.)....

United States v. Stone (D. C.)..
United States v. The Emperor (D.
C.)...

Page

263

297

Page

496

270

304

569

446 149

852

50

155

776

636

851

297

848

Stern, In re (C. C.)..

730

Stilwell & Bierce Manuf'g Co. v. Brown (C. C.).

738

[blocks in formation]
[blocks in formation]

Stone, The C. R., New York Harbor
& Tow-Boat Co. v. (D. C.)....... 475
Stone, United States v. (D. C.)...
Stoner, Kansas City, F. S. & M. R.
Co. v. (C. C. A.)..
Summers v. Chicago, S. F. & C. Ry.
Co. (C. C.)..
Sundberg, Bailey v. (C. C. A.)...... 583
Sun Ins. Co. v. The Hope (D. C.)... 279
Syracuse, The, and The Volunteer,
McClellan v. (D. C.).......

146 United States, Lee Foo v. (C. C. A.) 148 United States, Lem Hing Dun v. (C. C. A.)..

145

477

United States, Lem Hing Dun v. (C. C. A.)...

148

[blocks in formation]
[blocks in formation]

CASES

ARGUED AND DETERMINED

IN THE

UNITED STATES CIRCUIT COURTS OF APPEALS AND THE
CIRCUIT AND DISTRICT COURTS.

BLANKS et al. v. KLEIN et al.

UNIV. OF CALIFORNIA

(Circuit Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit. November 27, 1891.)

1. APPEAL-DIMINUTION OF RECORD-CERTIORARI.

On appeal to the circuit court of appeals the clerk of the court below, being the custodian of the record, is to determine, in the absence of agreement of counsel, what evidence shall be included in the transcript following the note of evidence made under the rule of court: and if any omissions are found relief can be had by certiorari for diminution of the record, as provided by court rule 18.

& SAME.

A transcript which contains all the parts of a deposition called for by either party is sufficient

Appeal from Circuit Court, Southern District of Mississippi.

Suit by A. L. Blanks and others against E. B. Klein and others, Plaintiff appeals. Heard on motion for alternative mandamus to clerk to certify copy of record. Motion denied.

Wade R. Young, for petitioners.

Mayre Dabney, opposed.

Before PARDEE, Circuit Judge, and LOCKE and BRUCE, District Judges.

LOCKE, District Judge. This motion coming on upon notice, and the parties appearing and presenting the facts of the case, we are able to decide the matter without issuing the writ or waiting for a return. The real question appears to be as to what should be contained in the record, and not as to whether the clerk should be ordered to certify the transcript. The clerk is the custodian of the record, and, in the absence of an agreement by counsel, it is for him to determine what evidence shall be included in the transcript following the note of evidence made under the rule of court. Upon the record being filed, if any omission or addition is found, v.49F.no.1-1

« AnteriorContinuar »