Casey

3

Yes, probably in 1938.

Q I take it you are a member of the Bar in

Do you know the plaintiff, Harry R. Fields?

Q

11

12

13

14

I met him in Mark Hopkins Hotel in San Francisco.

Please state the time.

A Approximately, it was in August, 1956, during the

Republican National Convention, I believe, it was in the latter part of August. It was during the Republican That's the way I identify it.

Convention.

Now or then?

Q

Well, as a stockholder and I have a royalty contract

on which I prepare material for them.

2

A I don't know whether it is a Delaware or New

3

York corporation, to tell you the truth. I don't know.

Either New York or Delaware, I believe.

5

Q

Α

7

Q

9

10

Where are its offices located?

2 West 13th Street, New York.

Was your business arrangement with the Institute for Business Planning the subject matter of

a written agreement between you and the Institute?

Yes.

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

MR. DONNELLY: I don't believe that is

relevant to the proceeding here, Mr. Garfield, and

I am going to object to it.

MR. GARFIELD: Do you direct the witness

not to produce it?

MR. DONNELLY: Yes.

MR. GARFIELD: Will you produce it and

have it marked for identification?

MR. DONNELLY:

Suppose we let that pass

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

133

MR. GARFIELD: This is an action for money

damages and the financial interest of the defendant

Casey and the financial interest and possible

profit of the defendant Institute for Business
Planning, is a matter which is clearly relevant

to the inquiry of damages, and for that reason,
in addition to the fact that it may be possibly

relevant to the issue in this case, I ask its

production.

Q Have you any business association direct

or indirect with Prentice-Hall, Inc.?

Α

I have no direct business association.

15

A

The only relationship I have which might be called a indirect relationship is that we are co-stockholders

in the Institute for Business Planning.

Well, I don't know whether he is the attorney

for them.

He is a director, an officer secretary.

Q Is he, to your knowledge, the attorney of record in this action for Prentice-Hall, Inc.?

me,

Is he? I don't know. You ought to know, not

Mr. Garfield.

Q

I direct your attention to an affidavit submitted by Mr.Mueller, and ask you whether you have

ever heard of it, or read it.

8

9

10

11

A

127

133

14

15

16

Dated January 14, 1960, it is Mr. Mueller's.

Q

As a matter of fact, wasn't he formerly

the attorney for the defendant Institute for Business Planning, before the law firm of DeWitt, Nast & Diskin

Mr. Nast, I don't know. I have not paid any attention to these details at all. I don't know.