Imágenes de páginas
PDF
EPUB

Quakers consented to take oaths, leaving a protest with the clerk of the court against them in the same breath with which they had taken them, do you in your conscience think that they would have been indulged at this day in their exclusive privilege of affirming? Let your people go on for a century or so, marrying in your own fashion, and I will warrant them, before the end of it, the Legislature will be willing to concede to them more than they at present demand.

Either the institution of marriage depends not for its validity upon hypocritical compliances with the ritual of an alien Church (and then I do not see why you cannot marry among yourselves, as the Quakers, without their indulgence, would have been doing to this day), or it does depend upon such ritual compliance; and then, in your protests, you offend against a divine ordinance. I have

read in the Essex Street Liturgy a form for the celebration of marriage. Why is this become a dead letter? Oh! it has never been legalized; that is to say, in the law's eye, it is no marriage. But do you take upon you to say, in the view of the gospel it would be none? Would your own people, at least, look upon a couple so paired to be none? But the case of dowries, alimonies, inheritances, &c., which depend for their validity upon the ceremonial of the Church by law established,—are these nothing? That our children are not legally Filii Nullius,—is this nothing? I answer, Nothing; to the preservation of a good conscience, nothing; to a consistent Christianity, less than nothing. Sad worldly thorns they are indeed, and stumbling-blocks well worthy to be set out of the way by a Legislature calling itself Christian; but not likely to be removed in a hurry by any shrewd legislators who perceive that the petitioning complainants have not so much as bruised a shin in the resistance, but, prudently declining the briers and the prickles, nestle quietly down in the smooth twosided velvet of a protesting occasional conformity.

I am, dear sir,

With much respect, yours, &c.,

ELIA.

7129

ON THE CUSTOM OF HISSING AT THE

THEATRES;

WITH SOME ACCOUNT OF A CLUB OF DAMNED AUTHORS.

MR.

R. REFLECTOR,-I am one of those persons whom the world has thought proper to designate by the title of Damned Authors. In that memorable season of dramatic failures, 1806-7,-in which no fewer, I think, than two tragedies, four comedies, one opera, and three farces, suffered at Drury Lane Theatre,-I was found guilty of constructing an afterpiece, and was damned.

Against the decision of the public in such instances there can be no appeal. The clerk of Chatham might as well have protested against the decision of Cade and his followers, who were then the public. Like him, I was condemned because I could write.

[ocr errors]

Not but it did appear to some of us that the measures of the popular tribunal at that period savoured a little of harshness and of the summum jus. The public mouth was early in the season fleshed upon the "Vindictive Man," and some pieces of that nature; and it retained, through the remainder of it, a relish of blood. As Dr. Johnson would have said, "Sir, there was a habit of sibilation in the house."

Still less am I disposed to inquire into the reason of the comparative lenity, on the other hand, with which some pieces were treated, which, to indifferent judges, seemed at least as much deserving of condemnation as some of those which met with it. I am willing to put a favourable construction upon the votes that were given against us; I believe that there was no bribery or designed partiality in the case only "our nonsense did not happen to suit their nonsense;" that was all.

But against the manner in which the public, on these occasions, think fit to deliver their disapprobation, I must and ever will protest.

Sir, imagine but you have been present at the damning of a piece (those who never had that felicity, I beg them to imagine a vast theatre, like that which Drury Lane was before it was a heap of dust and ashes (I insult not over its fallen greatness; let it recover itself when it can for me, let it lift up its towering head once more, and take in poor authors to write for it; hic cœstus artemque repono), a theatre like that, filled with all sorts of disgusting sounds,shrieks, groans, hisses, but chiefly the last, like the noise of many waters, or that which Don Quixote heard from the falling-mills, or that wilder combination of devilish sounds which St. Anthony listened to in the wilderness..::

~~On! Mr. Reflector, is it not a pity that the sweet human voice, which was given man to speak with, to sing with, to · whisper tones of love in, to express compliance; to convey a favour, or to grant a suit,that voice, which in Siddons or a Braham rouses us, in a siren Catalani charms and (captivates us,—that the musical, expressive human voice should be converted into a rival of the noises of silly geese, and irrational, venomous snakes?

I never shall forget the sounds on my night. I never before that time fully felt the reception which the Author of All Ill, in the Paradise Lost," meets with from the critics in the pit, at the final close of his "Tragedy upon the Human Race,”—though that, alas! met with too much

success—

[ocr errors]
[ocr errors]

"From innumerable tongues

A dismal universal hiss, the sound

Of public scorn. Dreadful was the din

Of hissing through the hall, thick swarming now
With complicated monsters, head and tail,
Scorpion and asp, and Amphisbæna dire,
Cerastes horned, Hydrüs, and Elops drear,
And Dipsas."

1. For hall substitute theatre, and you have the very image of what takes place at what is called the damnation of a piece, and properly so called; for here you see its origin plainly, whence the custom was derived, and what the first

piece was that so suffered. After this, none can doubt the propriety of the appellation. 19798 6 477

f.

[ocr errors]

But, sir, as to the justice of bestowing such appalling, heart-withering denunciations of the popular obloquý upon the venial mistake of a poor author, who thought to please sus in the act of filling his pockets,for the sum of his demerits amounts to no more than that, it does, I own, seem to mega species of retributive justice far too severe for the offence. A culprit in the pillory (bate the eggs){ meets with no severer exprobration.,Pistow You to

[ocr errors]
[ocr errors]
[ocr errors]
[ocr errors]

rot Indeed, I have often wondered that some modest critic has >not proposed that there should be a wooden machine to that effect erected in some convenient part of the proscenium, which an unsuccessful author should be required to mount, and stand his hour, exposed to the apples and oranges of the pitonThis amende honorable would well suit with the meanness of some authors, who, in their prologues, fairly prostrate their skulls to the audience, and seem to invite la pelting. 991 Or why should they not have their pens publicly broke over their heads, as the swords of recreant knights in old times were, and an oath administered to them that they Ishould never write again? ad 125t Ruiz 1979 1 TodSeriously, Messieurs the Public, this outrageous way which you have got of expressing your displeasures is too much for the occasion. When I was deafening under the effects dofsit, I could not help asking what crime of great moral turpitude I had committed: for every man about me seemed to feel the offence as personal to himself; as something which public interest and private feelings alike called upon him, in the strongest possible manner, to stigmatize with infamy.me we didi fad ant par nehty bed 10

[ocr errors]

The Romans, it is well known to you, Mr. Reflector, took a gentler method of marking their disapprobation of an author's work. They were a humane and equitable nation. They left the furca and the patibulum, the axe and the rods, to great offenders for these minor and (if I may so term them) extra-moral offences, the bent thumb was considered (as a sufficient sign of disapprobation, vertere pollicem ; as the pressed thumb, premere pollicem, was a mark of approving

And really there seems to have been a sort of fitness in this method, a correspondency of sign in the punishment to the offence. For, as the action of writing is performed by bending the thumb forward, the retroversion or bending back of that joint did not unaptly point to the opposite of that action; implying that it was the will of the audience that the author should write no more: a much more significant as well as more humane way of expressing that desire than our custom of hissing, which is altogether senseless and indefensible. Nor do we find that the Roman audiences deprived themselves, by this lenity, of any tittle of that supremacy which audiences in all ages have thought themselves bound to maintain over such as have been candidates for their applause. On the contrary, by this method they seem to have had the author, as we should express it, completely under finger and thumb.

The provocations to which a dramatic genius is exposed from the public are so much the more vexatious as they are removed from any possibility of retaliation, the hope of which sweetens most other injuries; for the public never writes itself. Not but something very like it took place at the time of the O. P. differences. The placards which were nightly exhibited were, properly speaking, the composition of the public. The public wrote them, the public applauded them; and precious morceaux of wit and eloquence they were, except some few, of a better quality, which it is well known were furnished by professed dramatic writers. After this specimen of what the public can do for itself, it should be a little slow in condemning what others do for it.

As the degrees of malignancy vary in people according as they have more or less of the Old Serpent (the father of hisses) in their composition, I have sometimes amused myself with analyzing this many-headed hydra, which calls itself the public, into the component parts of which it is "complicated, head and tail," and seeing how many varieties of the snake kind it can afford.

First, there is the Common English Snake.-This is that part of the auditory who are always the majority at damnations; but who, having no critical venom in themselves to

« AnteriorContinuar »